储能科学与技术 ›› 2024, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (6): 2068-2077.doi: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2023.0955

• 储能技术经济性分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于“电--电”过程的规模化氢储能经济性分析

林旗力1,2(), 陈珍1, 王晓虎1, 戚宏勋1(), 王伟1   

  1. 1.中国电力工程顾问集团有限公司中电储能工程技术研究院,上海 200333
    2.浙江大学工程师学院,浙江 杭州 310058
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-28 修回日期:2024-01-11 出版日期:2024-06-28 发布日期:2024-06-26
  • 通讯作者: 戚宏勋 E-mail:qllin@cpecc.net;hxqi@cpecc.net
  • 作者简介:林旗力(1985—),男,博士,高级工程师,主要从事储能/氢能集成技术与商业模式研究,E-mail:qllin@cpecc.net
  • 基金资助:
    中国电力工程顾问集团有限公司重大科技专项(DG3-A02-2023)

Economic analysis of large-scale hydrogen energy storage based on theelectric-hydrogen-electricprocess

Qili LIN1,2(), Zhen CHEN1, Xiaohu WANG1, Hongxun QI1(), Wei WANG1   

  1. 1.Engineering Technology Institute for Energy Storage of China Power Engineering Consulting Group Co. , LTD, Shanghai 200333, China
    2.Polytechnic Institute of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, China
  • Received:2023-12-28 Revised:2024-01-11 Online:2024-06-28 Published:2024-06-26
  • Contact: Hongxun QI E-mail:qllin@cpecc.net;hxqi@cpecc.net

摘要:

在“碳达峰、碳中和”战略背景下,氢能的重要性不断提升。当前,基于“电-氢-电”过程的氢储能总体处于示范应用阶段,储能成本是其形成竞争力的关键,但是关于规模化氢储能平准化成本(LCOES)的针对性研究未见报道。本文首先建立氢储能LCOES模型,对25 MW规模的氢储能电站系统进行了定量分析,而后预测了未来场景下的LCOES水平。结果表明,氢储能系统LCOES为4.758元/kWh,初始投资中制氢系统占比最高(44.66%),运行成本中制氢成本占比最高(42.99%)。电价对氢储能成本有一定影响,其每下降0.1元/kWh,LCOES降幅8.18%。虽然提升发电效率难度较大,但对氢储能的经济性非常关键,其每提升10%,LCOES平均降幅11.88%~12.50%。制氢系统和发电系统设备价格同时下降10%可带来LCOES 6.06%的降幅。储能时长对LCOES的影响较大,尤其是在时长较短时。当储能时长在4~8 h范围时,每增加1 h时长可使LCOES平均下降0.394元/kWh。未来随着水电解制氢和燃料电池设备价格的下降及效率的提升,氢储能有望成为长时、长周期储能领域具有竞争力的技术路线。

关键词: 氢储能, 电-氢-电, 规模化, 平准化储能成本, 经济性分析

Abstract:

In line with the "carbon peak, carbon neutral" initiative, the significance of hydrogen energy is increasingly recognized. Currently, hydrogen energy storage, based on the "electric-hydrogen-electric" process, is primarily in the demonstration application phase, with energy storage cost being a critical factor for its competitiveness. However, targeted research on the levelized cost of large-scale hydrogen energy storage (LCOES) is lacking. This study addresses this gap by establishing an LCOES model for hydrogen energy storage power and conducting quantitative analysis on a 25 MW scale hydrogen energy storage power station system. Subsequently, LCOES levels are projected for future scenarios. The findings reveal that the LCOES of the hydrogen energy storage system is 4.758 CNY/kWh. Capital expenditures are primarily attributed to the hydrogen production system (44.66%), while operational expenditures are dominated by hydrogen production costs (42.99%). Electricity prices notably influence hydrogen energy storage costs, with every 0.1 CNY/kWh decrease resulting in an 8.18% reduction in LCOES. Although enhancing power generation efficiency is challenging, it substantially impacts the economics of hydrogen energy storage, with every 10% increase leading to an 11.88% to 12.50% reduction in LCOES. A 10% decrease in the prices of hydrogen production and power generation system equipment correlates with a 6.06% decrease in LCOES. Energy storage duration markedly affects LCOES, particularly with shorter durations. Within the 4 to 8 h range, each additional hour of energy storage could decrease LCOES by an average of 0.394 CNY/kWh. As hydrogen production and fuel cell equipment prices decline and efficiency improves, hydrogen energy storage is anticipated to emerge as a competitive technical solution for long-term and extended-duration energy storage applications.

Key words: hydrogen energy storage, electric-hydrogen-electric, large-scale, levelized cost of energy storage, economic analysis

中图分类号: