多微电网参与下的配电侧直接电能交易纳什议价模型

doi:10.12028/j.issn.2095-4239.2019.0105

储能科学与技术 ›› 2019, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (4): 645-653.doi: 10.12028/j.issn.2095-4239.2019.0105

• 微电网与分布式储能技术专刊 • 上一篇下一篇

多微电网参与下的配电侧直接电能交易纳什议价模型

张进¹, 胡存刚^1,2, 芮涛²

1 安徽大学电气工程与自动化学院, 安徽合肥 230601;
2 安徽省工业节电与电能质量控制协同创新中心(安徽大学), 安徽合肥 230601

收稿日期:2019-05-24 修回日期:2019-06-12 出版日期:2019-07-01 发布日期:2019-07-01
通讯作者: 胡存刚,教授,E-mail:hucungang@163.com。
作者简介:张进(1994-),男,硕士研究生,E-mail:18297957022@139.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFB0900400）。

Nash bargaining model for direct electricity trading on distribution side with multi-microgrids participation

ZHANG Jin¹, HU Cungang^1,2, RUI Tao²

1 School of Electrical Engineering and Automation Anhui University, Hefei 230601, Anhui, China;
2 Anhui Provincial Collaborative Innovation Center of Industrial Energy Saving and Power Quality Control(Anhui University), Hefei 230601, Anhui, China

Received:2019-05-24 Revised:2019-06-12 Online:2019-07-01 Published:2019-07-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 随着售电侧电力市场改革的不断深入，研究多微电网参与下的配电侧直接电能交易具有重要意义。针对多微电网与负荷聚合商之间的直接电能交易，以各主体在传统交易方式下的最优效益作为谈判破裂点，提出了一种基于合作博弈论的纳什议价模型，模型中博弈参与者可获得帕累托最优效益。模型为非线性非凸问题，不易直接求解，将其分成求解支付和联盟效益最大化两个子问题。为保护交易主体内部隐私，联盟效益最大化问题采用交替方向乘子法进行分布式求解，交易双方在求解过程中仅需相互交换期望的交易电量。仿真结果表明该模型可以有效地提升交易双方的运营效益。

关键词: 微电网, 直接电能交易, 合作博弈, 纳什议价解, 交替方向乘子法

Abstract: With the deepening reform of the electricity market in the retail side, it is of great signifcance to study the direct electricity trading on the distribution side with the participation of multimicrogrids. In this paper, a Nash bargaining model based on cooperative game theory is proposed to deal with the direct electricity transaction between multi-microgrid and load aggregator, taking the optimal beneft of each participant under the traditional transaction mode as the disagreement point of bargaining, so that the participants of the game can obtain Pareto optimal beneft. The model is a non-linear and non-convex problem, which is diffcult to solve directly. Therefore, it is divided it into two sub-problems:solving payment and maximizing alliance benefts. In order to protect the privacy of each agent, the maximizing alliance benefits uses alternating direction method of multiplier to solve the distributed optimization problem. In the process of solving the model, only the expected transaction power is exchanged between the two parties. The simulation results show that the model can effectively improve the operational effciency of both sides of the transaction.

Key words: microgrid, direct electricity trading, cooperative game theory, Nash bargaining solution, alternating direction method of multiplier

中图分类号:

张进, 胡存刚, 芮涛. 多微电网参与下的配电侧直接电能交易纳什议价模型[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2019, 8(4): 645-653.

ZHANG Jin, HU Cungang, RUI Tao. Nash bargaining model for direct electricity trading on distribution side with multi-microgrids participation[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2019, 8(4): 645-653.

参考文献

[1] 董海鹰, 褚衍廷, 余雨婷. 实时电价理论下含蓄电池的微电网系统运行优化[J]. 太阳能学报, 2018, 39(10):2831-2842. DONG Haiying, CHU Yanting, YU Yuting. Optimal operation of microgrid containing battery under the theory of power spot prices[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2018, 39(10):2831-2842.
[2] 蔡高原, 吴红斌, 季宇, 等. 基于多代理系统的自治微电网有功协调控制[J]. 太阳能学报, 2017, 38(3):781-788. CAI Gaoyuan, WU Hongbin, JI Yu, et al. Active power coordination control for autonomous microgrid based on multi-agent system[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2017, 38(3):781-788.
[3] 刘念, 赵璟, 王杰, 等. 基于合作博弈论的光伏微电网群交易模型[J]. 电工技术学报, 2018, 33(8):1903-1910. LIU Nian, ZHAO Jing, WANG Jie, et al. A trading model of PV microgrid cluster based on cooperative game theory[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2018, 33(8):1903-1910.
[4] 刘一欣, 郭力, 王成山. 多微电网参与下的配电侧电力市场竞价博弈方法[J]. 电网技术, 2017, 41(8):71-78. LIU Yixin, GUO Li, WANG Chengshan. Optimal bidding strategy for microgrids in electricity distribution market[J]. Power System Technology, 2017, 41(8):71-78.
[5] ZHANG Ni, YAN Yu, SU Wencong. A game-theoretic economic operation of residential distribution system with high participation of distributed electricity prosumers[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 154:471-479.
[6] 张忠会, 刘故帅, 谢义苗. 基于博弈论的电力系统供给侧多方交易决策[J]. 电网技术, 2017, 41(6):83-89. ZHANG Zhonghui, LIU Gushuai, XIE Yimiao. A game theory approach to analyzing multi-party electricity trading on supply side[J]. Power System Technology, 2017, 41(6):83-89.
[7] MONDAL A, MISRA S, PATEL L S, et al. Demands:Distributed energy management using noncooperative scheduling in smart grid[J]. IEEE System Journal, 2018, 12(3):2645-2653.
[8] MANSHADI S D, KHODAYAR M E. A hierarchical electricity market structure for the smart grid paradigm[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2016, 7(4):1866-1875.
[9] 平健, 陈思捷, 张宁, 等. 基于智能合约的配电网去中心化交易机制[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2017, 37(13):22-30. PING Jian, CHEN Sijie, ZHANG Ning, et al. Decentralized transactive mechanism in distribution network based on smart contract[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2017, 37(13):22-30.
[10] 朱广文, 熊宁, 钟士元, 等. 基于区块链的配电网电力交易方法[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2018, 46(24):165-172. ZHU Wenguang, XIONG Ning, ZHONG Shiyuan. Power trading method for distribution network based on block chain[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2018, 46(24):165-172.
[11] LEE W, XIANG Lin, SCHOBER R, et al. Direct electricity trading in smart grid:a coalitional game analysis[J]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2014, 32(7):1398-1411.
[12] ZHANG Biling, JIANG Chunxiao, YU J-L, et al. A contract game for direct energy trading in smart grid[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2018, 9(4):2873-2884.
[13] LIU Nian, YU Xinghuo, WANG Cheng, et al. Energy sharing management for microgrids with PV prosumers:A stackelberg game approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2017, 13(3):1088-1098.
[14] 卢强, 陈来军, 梅生伟. 博弈论在电力系统中典型应用及若干展望[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2014, 34(29):5009-5017. LU Qiang, CHEN Laijun, MEI Shengwei. Typical applications and prospects of game theory in power system[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2014, 34(29):5009-5017.
[15] NGUYEN H K, KHODAEI A, HAN Zhu. Incentive mechanism design for integrated microgrids in peak ramp minimization problem[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2018, 9(6):5774-5785.
[16] FAN Songli, AI Qian, PIAO Longjian. Bargaining-based cooperative energy trading for distribution company and demand response[J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 226:469-482.
[17] NASH J F JR. The bargaining problem[J]. Econometrica, 1950, 18(2):155-162.
[18] BOYD S, PARIKH N, CHU E, et al. Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers[J]. Foundations & Trends in Machine Learning, 2010, 3(1):1-122.
[19] WANG Hao, HUANG Jianwei. Joint investment and operation of microgrid[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2017, 8(2):833-845.

多微电网参与下的配电侧直接电能交易纳什议价模型

Nash bargaining model for direct electricity trading on distribution side with multi-microgrids participation

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 13

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	申景潮, 胡健, 胡敬梁, 焦提操, 齐晓妹, 王云鹏, 于娣, 刘尚奇. 直流微电网储能装置双向DC-DC变换器参数自适应反步控制[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(5): 1512-1522.
[2]	李瑜, 张占强, 孟克其劳, 魏皓天. 基于分层控制的孤岛微电网储能优化控制策略[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(1): 176-184.
[3]	孙乐平, 韩帅, 吴宛潞, 郭小璇. 基于经济模型预测控制的多虚拟电厂两阶段协调优化调度[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(5): 1845-1853.
[4]	徐余丰, 严加斌, 何建明, 琚正伟, 程革, 郑达, 邹印龙, 叶磊, 王建新. 退役动力锂电池在光储微电网的集成与应用[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(1): 349-354.
[5]	李益民, 王关平, 马建立, 杨浩, 朱亮, 闫红强, 徐铮, 朱冬琴. 基于天牛须搜索遗传算法的风光柴储互补发电系统容量优化配置研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2020, 9(3): 918-926.
[6]	姚清诚, 袁晓玲, 黄保乐. 基于蒙特卡罗源荷不确定性处理的独立微网优化配置[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2020, 9(1): 186-194.
[7]	张文建, 崔青汝, 李志强, 余康. 电化学储能在发电侧的应用[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2020, 9(1): 287-295.
[8]	郝文博, 郑常宝, 胡存刚, 芮涛, 张进. 考虑电价激励的孤岛微电网经济调度策略[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2019, 8(4): 659-664.
[9]	寇凌峰, 熊雄, 侯小刚, 牛耕, 屈小云, 陈凡. 面向低压配变台区的微电网技术[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2019, 8(4): 665-670.
[10]	卓静, 王兴兴, 贾天翼. 独立水光储微电网系统的简化设计[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2018, 7(S1): 34-38.
[11]	赵启龙, 贺博伟, 孟琳. 基于储能技术的微电网能源管理系统[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2018, 7(S1): 108-111.
[12]	金辰晖, 姜新建, 戴兴建. 微电网飞轮储能阵列协调控制策略研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2018, 7(5): 834-840.
[13]	刘洋, 唐跃进, 石晶, 任丽, 徐颖, 邓嘉翕, 龚康, 姜国中, 谢阳. 100 kJ/50 kW高温超导磁储能系统在微电网中的应用[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2015, 4(3): 319-326.