含水层型地下储氢库垫层气类型优选及注采参数优化

doi:10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2023.0348

储能科学与技术 ›› 2023, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (9): 2881-2887.doi: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2023.0348

含水层型地下储氢库垫层气类型优选及注采参数优化

郝永卯¹(), 任侃¹, 崔传智¹(), 吴忠维²

^1.中国石油大学（华东）石油工程学院，山东青岛 266580
^2.长江大学石油工程学院，湖北武汉 430100

收稿日期:2023-05-22 修回日期:2023-07-03 出版日期:2023-09-05 发布日期:2023-09-16
通讯作者: 崔传智 E-mail:haoyongmao@163.com;ccz2008@126.com
作者简介:郝永卯（1976—），男，博士，副教授，主要从事油气田开发、天然气水合物开采技术方面的研究工作，E-mail：haoyongmao@163.com；
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(51974343);山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2017MEE054)

Optimization of cushion gas types and injection production parameters for underground hydrogen storage in aquifers

Yongmao HAO¹(), Kan REN¹, Chuanzhi CUI¹(), Zhongwei WU²

^1.School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China
^2.School of Petroleum Engineering, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, Hubei, China

Received:2023-05-22 Revised:2023-07-03 Online:2023-09-05 Published:2023-09-16
Contact: Chuanzhi CUI E-mail:haoyongmao@163.com;ccz2008@126.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

发展地下储氢技术是克服可再生能源波动性和间歇性的有效方法；为确保采出更多的氢气，地下储氢库需要注入垫层气以提高地层压力、抑制地层水的流动。鉴于含水层型储氢库垫层气的研究较少且基本为定性研究，本工作通过数值模拟方法建立储氢库机理模型，该模型考虑垫层气注入种类、不同组合、注入量和注入速度因素对氢气采出程度的影响。结果表明，在第一个注采周期中，垫层气的注入对于氢气采出程度的影响更为明显，其中甲烷方案将氢气的采出程度提高18.41%；二氧化碳作垫层气时可能会因为甲烷化反应而产生较差的作用；氢气的采出程度随垫层气分子量的增加而降低，随垫层气的注入量增加而增加；注入垫层气能够提高地层压力、抑制地层水的流动，二者共同作用可以降低重力偏析的影响，进而增加氢气的采出程度；在储氢库的早期阶段，垫层气的合理注入对储氢库的运行至关重要。

关键词: 氢气储存, 含水层, 垫层气, 氢气采出程度

Abstract:

The advancement of UHS (underground hydrogen storage) technology offers a viable solution to the volatility and intermittent nature of renewable energy. In increasing hydrogen production, the UHS must inject cushion gas to increase formation pressure and inhibit formation water flow. Since studies on cushion gas in the aquifer are limited and qualitative, the mechanism model of the hydrogen storage reservoir is established using a numerical simulation method that considers the effects of cushion gas injection types, different combinations, injection volumes, and injection rates on hydrogen recovery. The results showed that the impact of cushion gas injection on hydrogen recovery in the first injection-production cycle was more obvious, and the methane scheme increased the hydrogen recovery by 18.41%. Carbon dioxide as a cushion gas may have a poor effect because of the methanation reaction. The hydrogen recovery decreases with the increase in molecular weight of cushion gas and increases with the increase in injection amount of cushion gas. Moreover, the injection of cushion gas can increase formation pressure and inhibit formation water flow, reducing the influence of gravity segregation and increasing hydrogen recovery. In the early stage of hydrogen storage, the reasonable injection of cushion gas is crucial for the operation of hydrogen storage.

Key words: hydrogen storage, aquifer, cushion gas, hydrogen recovery

中图分类号:

TE 822

郝永卯, 任侃, 崔传智, 吴忠维. 含水层型地下储氢库垫层气类型优选及注采参数优化[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(9): 2881-2887.

Yongmao HAO, Kan REN, Chuanzhi CUI, Zhongwei WU. Optimization of cushion gas types and injection production parameters for underground hydrogen storage in aquifers[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(9): 2881-2887.

图/表 14

图1

图2

表1

表2

图3

图4

图5

图6

表3

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

参考文献 24

1	STATHOPOULOS T, ALRAWASHDEH H, AL-QURAAN A, et al. Urban wind energy: Some views on potential and challenges[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2018, 179: 146-157.
2	THIYAGARAJAN S R, EMADI H, HUSSAIN A, et al. A comprehensive review of the mechanisms and efficiency of underground hydrogen storage[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2022, 51: 104490.
3	陆佳敏, 徐俊辉, 王卫东, 等. 大规模地下储氢技术研究展望[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(11): 3699-3707.
	LU J M, XU J H, WANG W D, et al. Research prospect of large-scale underground hydrogen storage technology[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(11): 3699-3707.
4	TARKOWSKI R. Underground hydrogen storage: Characteristics and prospects[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, 105: 86-94.
5	ZIVAR D, KUMAR S, FOROOZESH J. Underground hydrogen storage: A comprehensive review[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(45): 23436-23462.
6	崔传智, 任侃, 吴忠维, 等. 地下含水层储存氢气的可行性分析[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2022, 51(5): 41-50.
	CUI C Z, REN K, WU Z W, et al. Feasibility analysis of hydrogen storage in underground aquifer[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas, 2022, 51(5): 41-50.
7	BAI T, TAHMASEBI P. Coupled hydro-mechanical analysis of seasonal underground hydrogen storage in a saline aquifer[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2022, 50: 104308.
8	PAN B, LIU K, REN B, et al. Impacts of relative permeability hysteresis, wettability, and injection/withdrawal schemes on underground hydrogen storage in saline aquifers[J]. Fuel, 2023, 333: 126516.
9	LUBOŃ K, TARKOWSKI R. The influence of the first filling period length and reservoir level depth on the operation of underground hydrogen storage in a deep aquifer[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(3): 1024-1042.
10	王然. N₂作枯竭气藏型储气库垫层气的数值模拟研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2019.
	WANG R. A numerical simulation study of underground gas storage in depleted gas reservoirs with N₂ as cushion gas[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2019.
11	ZAMEHRIAN M, SEDAEE B. Underground hydrogen storage in a partially depleted gas condensate reservoir: Influence of cushion gas[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 212: 110304.
12	HEINEMANN N, SCAFIDI J, PICKUP G, et al. Hydrogen storage in saline aquifers: The role of cushion gas for injection and production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(79): 39284-39296.
13	SADEGHI S, SEDAEE B. Mechanistic simulation of cushion gas and working gas mixing during underground natural gas storage[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2022, 46: 103885.
14	SADEGHI S, SEDAEE B. Cushion and working gases mixing during underground gas storage: Role of fractures[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2022, 55: 105530.
15	MATOS C R, CARNEIRO J F, SILVA P P. Overview of large-scale underground energy storage technologies for integration of renewable energies and criteria for reservoir identification[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2019, 21: 241-258.
16	MUHAMMED N S, HAQ B, AL SHEHRI D, et al. A review on underground hydrogen storage: Insight into geological sites, influencing factors and future outlook[J]. Energy Reports, 2022, 8: 461-499.
17	BIN NAVAID H, EMADI H, WATSON M. A comprehensive literature review on the challenges associated with underground hydrogen storage[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(28): 10603-10635.
18	美】罗·里特, 约翰·普劳斯尼茨, 托·舍伍德, 著. 李芝芬, 杨怡生, 译. 气体和液体性质[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1994.
19	PENG D Y, ROBINSON D B. A new two-constant equation of state[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, 1976, 15(1): 59-64.
20	SCHALENBACH M, LUEKE W, STOLTEN D. Hydrogen diffusivity and electrolyte permeability of the zirfon PERL separator for alkaline water electrolysis[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2016, 163(14): F1480-F1488.
21	BROOKS R H, COREY A T. Properties of porous media affecting fluid flow[J]. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, 1966, 92(2): 61-88.
22	ŠMIGÁŇ P, GREKSÁK M, KOZÁNKOVÁ J, et al. Methanogenic bacteria as a key factor involved in changes of town gas stored in an underground reservoir[J]. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 1990, 73(3): 221-224.
23	ABDELLATIF M, HASHEMI M, AZIZMOHAMMADI S. Large-scale underground hydrogen storage: Integrated modeling of reservoir-wellbore system[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023,48(50): 19160-19171.
24	LORD A S, KOBOS P H, BORNS D J. Geologic storage of hydrogen: Scaling up to meet city transportation demands[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(28): 15570-15582.

参数	数值	参数	数值
网格大小	51×51×10	岩石压缩系数	2.0×10^-3 MPa^-1
网格尺寸	20 m×20 m×5 m	地层水压缩系数	4.5×10^-4 MPa^-1
顶深	800 m	初始地层温度	50 ℃
横向渗透率	100 mD^①	初始地层压力	8 MPa
纵横向渗透率比值	0.3	残余气饱和度	0.2
孔隙度	0.20

气体	临界压力/MPa	临界温度/℃	偏心因子	分子量	压缩因子	临界体积/(L/mol)
CO₂	7.28	31.05	0.225	44.010	0.2736	0.0940
N₂	3.35	-146.95	0.040	28.013	0.2905	0.0895
CH₄	4.54	-82.55	0.008	16.043	0.2876	0.0990
H₂	1.30	-239.96	-0.214	2.016	0.3199	0.0669

方案	累计注入氢气/10⁶ m³		累计采出氢气/10⁶ m³
方案	第一周期	第五周期	第一周期	第五周期
基础模型	3.478	17.392	1.428	11.375
CH₄作垫层气	3.478	17.392	2.068	12.673
CO₂作垫层气	3.478	17.392	1.663	11.218
N₂作垫层气	3.478	17.392	1.998	12.229

含水层型地下储氢库垫层气类型优选及注采参数优化

Optimization of cushion gas types and injection production parameters for underground hydrogen storage in aquifers

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 14

参考文献 24

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价