基于磁性测试揭示CoO储锂机理

doi:10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2023.0707

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

当今社会对储能技术需求日益迫切，电化学储能作为储能系统中的“桥梁”极具发展潜力，然而面临电化学储能中微量杂质相检测以及复杂界面储能探测的挑战，传统表征手段已经显示出局限性。储能材料的晶体结构、元素价态、电子能带以及电化学特性与其磁学性质密切耦合，因此本文基于磁性测试，通过高低温等温磁化曲线(magnetic hysteresis，M-H)测试、零场冷/场冷(zero-field-cooled/field-cooled，ZFC/FC)变温磁化曲线测试，相较于传统表征手段X射线衍射(X-ray diffraction，XRD)、X射线光电子能谱(X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy，XPS)及高分辨透射电镜(high resolution transmission electron microscope，HRTEM)，能够定量、高效、精准地检测出CoO中存在有效降低极化、提升首圈库仑效率(74.3%～83.77%)、提高大电流循环性能(2 A/g 50圈容量保持率116.59%)的微量金属Co杂质相(CoO/Co@20min 0.66%，CoO/Co@40min 2.27%)。同时本文利用原位实时磁学循环伏安法CV测试及恒流充放电测试，直观揭示出CoO在低电压区间里复杂、难以探测的空间电荷与固体电解质界面(solid electrolyte interphase，SEI)膜两种不同类型的界面储能机制，成功解释了CoO远超理论容量的额外容量来源。储能材料的合成制备离不开高度精准的杂质相检测，储能领域的下一步研究发展取决于能否对界面储能深入理解。本工作为杂质相检测及界面储能机理探测提供了一种无伤且高分辨的磁学全新视角，为推动储能领域的创新，解决当今社会面临的能源挑战贡献力量。

关键词: 磁学测试, 杂质相监测, 界面储能, 原位实时磁学测试, 磁电化学

Abstract:

The increasing demand for energy storage technology highlights electrochemical energy storage as a crucial component of energy storage systems. However, conventional characterization techniques encounter difficulties discerning subtle impurity phases and exploring intricate energy storage processes at interfaces. The magnetic properties of energy storage materials, which are intricately linked with crystal structures, elemental valence states, electronic energy bands, and electrochemical properties, offer a promising avenue for exploration. This paper uses magnetic hysteresis (M-H) tests and zero-field-cooled/field-cooled (ZFC/FC) tests to elucidate the lithium storage mechanism of CoO. A comparative analysis is conducted using traditional characterization methods, including x-ray diffraction, x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM). Our findings reveal trace amounts of metallic Co monomer impurity phases in CoO with remarkable precision (CoO/Co@20min 0.66%, CoO/Co@40min 2.27%). These impurity phases play a crucial role in reducing polarization, enhancing the first-cycle Coulombic efficiency (74.3%—83.77%), and improving high-current cycling performance (2 A/g 50-cycles capacity retention of 116.59%). Moreover, this study employs in-situ real-time magnetic cyclic voltammetry tests and constant-current charge/discharge tests to visually elucidate the intricate interfacial energy storage mechanism between the space charge and the solid electrolyte interphase membrane of CoO in the low-voltage zone. The results successfully explain the origin of the extra capacity of CoO, surpassing the theoretical capacity. The synthesis and formulation of energy storage materials are intricately tied to achieving precision in impurity phase detection. Our work offers a novel perspective on using magnetism for detecting impurity phases and probing energy storage mechanisms at interfaces in a noninvasive and high-resolution manner. This contribution propels innovations in the field of energy storage, addressing contemporary energy challenges faced by society. The evolution of research and development endeavors in energy storage relies on a profound understanding of the intricate intricacies governing interfacial energy storage phenomena.

Key words: magnetic measurement, impurity phase monitoring, interfacial energy storage, in-situ magnetometry, magnetoelectrochemistry

中图分类号:

TK 01

徐熙祥, 赵越, 阮明岳, 李强. 基于磁性测试揭示CoO储锂机理[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(1): 12-23.

Xixiang XU, Yue ZHAO, Mingyue RUAN, Qiang LI. CoO lithium storage mechanism revealed based on magnetic measurement[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2024, 13(1): 12-23.

图/表 9

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

参考文献 42

1	DUFFNER F, KRONEMEYER N, TÜBKE J, et al. Post-lithium-ion battery cell production and its compatibility with lithium-ion cell production infrastructure[J]. Nature Energy, 2021, 6(2): 123-134.
2	XIAO J E, SHI F F, GLOSSMANN T, et al. From laboratory innovations to materials manufacturing for lithium-based batteries[J]. Nature Energy, 2023, 8(4): 329-339.
3	ZHU Z X, JIANG T L, ALI M, et al. Rechargeable batteries for grid scale energy storage[J]. Chemical Reviews, 2022, 122(22): 16610-16751.
4	JI S P, SONG C Y, LI J F, et al. Metal phosphides embedded with in situ-formed metal phosphate impurities as buffer materials for high-performance potassium-ion batteries[J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2021, 11(40): 169-190.
5	BEAK M, PARK J, PARK S, et al. Understanding the effect of nonmetallic impurities in regenerated cathode materials for lithium-ion battery recycling by tracking down impurity elements[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2022, 425: 127907.
6	XIONG F Y, TAN S S, YAO X H, et al. Crystal defect modulation in cathode materials for non-lithium ion batteries: Progress and challenges[J]. Materials Today, 2021, 45: 169-190.
7	HAN Y Y, LIU B, XIAO Z, et al. Interface issues of lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries: Challenges, strategies, and perspectives[J]. InfoMat, 2021, 3(2): 155-174.
8	TAN D H S, BANERJEE A, CHEN Z, et al. From nanoscale interface characterization to sustainable energy storage using all-solid-state batteries[J]. Nature Nanotechnology, 2020, 15(3): 170-180.
9	ADENUSI H, CHASS G A, PASSERINI S, et al. Lithium batteries and the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI)—Progress and outlook[J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2023, 13(10): 2203307.
10	LIU D Q, SHADIKE Z, LIN R Q, et al. Review of recent development of in situ/operando characterization techniques for lithium battery research[J]. Advanced Materials, 2019, 31(28): e1806620.
11	REN H X, LI Y, NI Q, et al. Unraveling anionic redox for sodium layered oxide cathodes: Breakthroughs and perspectives[J]. Advanced Materials, 2022, 34(8): e2106171.
12	TAN J A, MATZ J, DONG P, et al. A growing appreciation for the role of LiF in the solid electrolyte interphase[J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2021, 11(16): 2100046.
13	LI X K, ZHANG L Q, LIU H J, et al. Magnetic measurements applied to energy storage (adv. energy mater. 24/2023)[J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2023, 13(24): 2300927.
43	CHEN C C, FU L J, MAIER J. Synergistic, ultrafast mass storage and removal in artificial mixed conductors[J]. Nature, 2016, 536(7615): 159-164.
44	FU L J, CHEN C C, SAMUELIS D, et al. Thermodynamics of lithium storage at abrupt junctions: Modeling and experimental evidence[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2014, 112(20): 208301.
45	LARUELLE S, GRUGEON S, POIZOT P, et al. On the origin of the extra electrochemical capacity displayed by MO/Li cells at low potential[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2002, 149(5): A627.
46	GRUGEON S, LARUELLE S, DUPONT L, et al. An update on the reactivity of nanoparticles Co-based compounds towards Li[J]. Solid State Sciences, 2003, 5(6): 895-904.
47	ZHANG L J, HU P, ZHAO X Y, et al. Controllable synthesis of core-shell Co@CoO nanocomposites with a superior performance as an anode material for lithium-ion batteries[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2011, 21(45): 18279-18283.
48	SONG Z P, ZHOU H S. Towards sustainable and versatile energy storage devices: An overview of organic electrode materials[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2013, 6(8): 2280-2301.
14	ZHAO Z, LIU H, XU X, et al. Magnetometry technique in energy storage science [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(3): 818-833.
15	CHERNOVA N A, NOLIS G M, OMENYA F O, et al. What can we learn about battery materials from their magnetic properties?[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2011, 21(27): 9865-9875.
16	AIT SALAH A, ZAGHIB K, MAUGER A, et al. Magnetic studies of the carbothermal effect on LiFePO₄[J]. Physica Status Solidi (a), 2006, 203(1): R1-R3.
17	AIT SALAH A, MAUGER A, ZAGHIB K, et al. Reduction Fe³⁺ of impurities in LiFePO₄ from pyrolysis of organic precursor used for carbon deposition[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2006, 153(9): A1692.
18	CHEN J J, VACCHIO M J, WANG S J, et al. The hydrothermal synthesis and characterization of olivines and related compounds for electrochemical applications[J]. Solid State Ionics, 2008, 178(31/32): 1676-1693.
19	LI Q, LI H S, XIA Q T, et al. Extra storage capacity in transition metal oxide lithium-ion batteries revealed by in situ magnetometry[J]. Nature Materials, 2021, 20(1): 76-83.
20	LI H S, HU Z Q, XIA Q T, et al. Lithium-ion batteries: Operando magnetometry probing the charge storage mechanism of CoO lithium-ion batteries[J]. Advanced Materials, 2021, 33(12): doi: 10.1002/adma.202170093.
21	LI H A, WU X Q, WANG P, et al. Interface engineering of hollow CoO/Co₄S₃@CoO/Co₄S₃ heterojunction for highly stable and efficient electrocatalytic overall water splitting[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2022, 10(39): 13112-13124.
22	KUMAR A, DRAGOE D, BERARDAN D, et al. Thermoelectric properties of high-entropy rare-earth cobaltates[J]. Journal of Materiomics, 2023, 9(1): 191-196.
23	KUMAR R, SAHOO S, TAN W K, et al. Microwave-assisted thin reduced graphene oxide-cobalt oxide nanoparticles as hybrids for electrode materials in supercapacitor[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2021, 40: 102724.
24	DAI K Q, ZHANG N, ZHANG L L, et al. Self-supported Co/CoO anchored on N-doped carbon composite as bifunctional electrocatalyst for efficient overall water splitting[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 414: 128804.
25	WANG H Z, ZHAO L Y, ZHANG H, et al. Revealing the multiple cathodic and anodic involved charge storage mechanism in an FeSe₂ cathode for aluminium-ion batteries by in situ magnetometry[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2022, 15(1): 311-319.
26	BIESINGER M C, PAYNE B P, GROSVENOR A P, et al. Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2011, 257(7): 2717-2730.
27	MORENO-PINEDA E, WERNSDORFER W. Measuring molecular magnets for quantum technologies[J]. Nature Reviews Physics, 2021, 3(9): 645-659.
28	AXMANN P, STINNER C, WOHLFAHRT-MEHRENS M, et al. Nonstoichiometric LiFePO₄: Defects and related properties[J]. Chemistry of Materials, 2009, 21(8): 1636-1644.
29	JAUCH W, REEHUIS M, BLEIF H J, et al. Crystallographic symmetry and magnetic structure of CoO[J]. Physical Review B, 2001, 64(5): 052102.
30	PENG D L, SUMIYAMA K, HIHARA T, et al. Magnetic properties of monodispersed Co/CoO clusters[J]. Physical Review B, 2000, 61(4): 3103-3109.
31	BILLAS I M L, CHÂTELAIN A, DE HEER W A. Magnetism from the atom to the bulk in iron, cobalt, and nickel clusters[J]. Science, 1994, 265(5179): 1682-1684.
32	BERNEVIG B A, FELSER C, BEIDENKOPF H. Progress and prospects in magnetic topological materials[J]. Nature, 2022, 603(7899): 41-51.
33	HU J M, CHEN L Q, NAN C W. Multiferroic heterostructures integrating ferroelectric and magnetic materials[J]. Advanced Materials, 2016, 28(1): 15-39.
34	SONG C, CUI B, LI F, et al. Recent progress in voltage control of magnetism: Materials, mechanisms, and performance[J]. Progress in Materials Science, 2017, 87: 33-82.
35	TOURNUS F, TAMION A. Magnetic susceptibility curves of a nanoparticle assembly Ⅱ‍. Simulation and analysis of ZFC/FC curves in the case of a magnetic anisotropy energy distribution[J]. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2011, 323(9): 1118-1127.
36	LIVESEY K L, RUTA S, ANDERSON N R, et al. Beyond the blocking model to fit nanoparticle ZFC/FC magnetisation curves[J]. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8: 11166.
37	WEISSMAN M B. What is a spin glass? A glimpse via mesoscopic noise[J]. Reviews of Modern Physics, 1993, 65(3): 829-839.
38	ANTÓN R L, GONZÁLEZ J A, ANDRÉS J P, et al. High-vacuum annealing reduction of Co/CoO nanoparticles[J]. Nanotechnology, 2014, 25(10): 105702.
39	BLATT M, WISEMAN S, DOMANY E. Superparamagnetic clustering of data[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1996, 76(18): 3251-3254.
40	LIPP J, BANERJEE R, PATWARY M F, et al. Extension of rietveld refinement for benchtop powder XRD analysis of ultrasmall supported nanoparticles[J]. Chemistry of Materials, 2022, 34(18): 8091-8111.
41	ZHUKOVSKII Y F, BALAYA P, KOTOMIN E A, et al. Evidence for interfacial-storage anomaly in nanocomposites for lithium batteries from first-principles simulations[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2006, 96(5): 058302.
42	FU L J, CHEN C C, MAIER J. Interfacial mass storage in nanocomposites[J]. Solid State Ionics, 2018, 318: 54-59.