Combustibility and hazard of lithium iron phosphate power battery components in different aging states

doi:10.12028/j.issn.2095-4239.2019.0133

Energy Storage Science and Technology ›› 2019, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (6): 1176-1181.doi: 10.12028/j.issn.2095-4239.2019.0133

Combustibility and hazard of lithium iron phosphate power battery components in different aging states

GAO Fei¹, WANG Kangkang¹, TIAN Baogui², CHEN Qingtao³, YANG Kai¹, SU Zhenxi³, ZHANG Mingjie¹, LIU Wei³, FAN Maosong¹, LIU Hao¹, GENG Mengmeng¹, WANG Kaifeng¹

1 State Key Laboratory of Operation and Control of Renewable Energy&Storage Systems, China Electric Power Research Institute, Beijing 100192, China;
2 School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China;
3 State Grid Anhui Electric Power CO. LTD, Hefei 230000, Anhui, China

Received:2019-06-11 Revised:2019-06-13 Online:2019-11-01 Published:2019-07-31

Abstract

Abstract: In this paper, four kinds of aging states, capacity retention ratio (CRR) of 100%, 85%, 75% and 65% lithium ion phosphate power battery were selected as the research objects. The combustibility and smoke generation of key components of the battery (positive, negative and separator, all containing electrolyte) were studied by cone calorimeter. The fire risk assessment index system of batteries with different aging states was established by using AHP (analytic hierarchy process). The results show that the effective combustion heat value of the negative electrode decreases as the battery CRR declines, And the yield of CO₂ and total smoke production of battery components gradually decrease. The normalized risk index of battery components with a capacity retention rate of 100%~85% is significantly higher than that of battery components with a capacity retention rate of 75%~65%.

Key words: lithium iron phosphate power battery, cone calorimeter, risk assessment, analytic hierarchy process (AHP), fire hazard index

CLC Number:

X932

GAO Fei, WANG Kangkang, TIAN Baogui, CHEN Qingtao, YANG Kai, SU Zhenxi, ZHANG Mingjie, LIU Wei, FAN Maosong, LIU Hao, GENG Mengmeng, WANG Kaifeng. Combustibility and hazard of lithium iron phosphate power battery components in different aging states[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2019, 8(6): 1176-1181.

References

[1] NEUBAUER J, PESARAN A. The ability of battery second use strategies to impact plug-in electric vehicle prices and serve utility energy storage applications[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2011, 196(23):10351-10358.
[2] ZENG X, LI J, SHEN B. Novel approach to recover cobalt and lithium from spent lithium-ion battery using oxalic acid[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015, 295:112-118.
[3] XIAO J, LI J, XU Z. Recycling metals from lithium ion battery by mechanical separation and vacuum metallurgy[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2017, 338:124-131.
[4] HU J, ZHANG J, LI H, et al. A promising approach for the recovery of high value-added metals from spent lithium-ion batteries[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2017, 351:192-199.
[5] LI L, BIAN Y, ZHANG X, et al. Economical recycling process for spent lithium-ion batteries and macro- and micro-scale mechanistic study[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2018, 377:70-79.
[6] MARTINEZ-LASERNA E, SARASKETA-ZABALA E, VILLARREAL I, et al. Technical viability of battery second life:A study from the ageing perspective[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2018:1.
[7] TONG Shijie, FUNG T, KLEIN M P, et al. Demonstration of reusing electric vehicle battery for solar energy storage and demand side management[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2017, 11:200-210.
[8] LIAO Q, MU M, ZHAO S, et al. Performance assessment and classification of retired lithium ion battery from electric vehicles for energy storage[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(30):18817-18823.
[9] IDJIS H, COSTA P D. Is electric vehicles battery recovery a source of cost or profit?[J]. Springer International Publishing, 2017:117-134.
[10] DONG S, SHUANG X. State of health prediction of second-use lithium-ion battery[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2018, 33(9):2121-2129.
[11] SHI L, SHUAI J, XU K. Fuzzy fault tree assessment based on improved AHP for fire and explosion accidents for steel oil storage tanks[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2014, 278:529-538.
[12] 付强, 王超, 郭亮. 基于层次分析法的电缆燃烧性能综合指标评价体系[J]. 火灾科学, 2012, 21(4):197-202. FU Q, WANG C, GUO L. Assessment on combustion performance of cable by AHP method[J]. Fire Safety Science, 2012, 21(4):197-202.
[13] ISO 5660-1. Reaction-to-fire tests-Heat release, smoke production and mass loss rate-Part1:Heat release rate (cone calorimeter method)[S]. 2015.
[14] 舒中俊, 徐晓楠, 杨守生, 等. 基于锥形量热仪试验的聚合物材料火灾危险评价研究[J]. 高分子通报, 2006(5):37-44+78. SHU Z, XU X, YANG S, et al. Integrated assessing fire hazard of polymer based on data of cone calorimeter[J]. Chinese Polymer Bulletin, 2006(5):37-44+78.
[15] 郭子东, 岳海玲. 基于层次分析法的聚合物火灾危险性评估[J]. 中国塑料, 2006, 20(2):85-87. GUO Zidong, YUE Hailing. Fire-safety evaluation for polymers by hierarchical analysis process[J]. China Plastics, 2006, 20(2):85-87.

Combustibility and hazard of lithium iron phosphate power battery components in different aging states

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 3

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	ZHOU Wei, FU Dongju, LIU Weifeng, CHEN Jianjun, HU Zhao, ZENG Xierong. Research progress on recycling technology of waste lithium iron phosphate power battery [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(6): 1854-1864.
[2]	Xiaoyuan WU, Xinbao LU, Jiaxuan DONG, Ru WANG. Local policy for fuel cell vehicles [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2021, 10(6): 1987-1997.
[3]	JIANG Chaoyu, WANG Weichao, YANG Xueping. Modeling and SOC calculations of hybrid electrical vehicles(HEV) powered by lithium iron phosphate batteries [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2018, 7(5): 897-901.