Combined heating and power system coupled with compressed air energy storage and absorption heat pump cycle

doi:10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2020.0307

Abstract

Abstract:

Combining compressed air energy storage (CAES) and renewable energy is recognized as an effective way to solve the dependence of the conventional compressed air energy storage system on fossil fuels and to increase the renewable energy penetration. In this paper, by integrating the CAES with an electrical heater (CH-CAES), the amount of heat storage in the thermal storage device is greatly improved, and, simultaneously, the capacity of the expander to output mechanical power in the compressed air energy storage system is improved. To recover the high temperature residual heat of the thermal storage device in the CAES, a novel combined heat and power system (CH-CAES-AHP) coupled with the CH-CAES and absorption heat pump cycle (AHP) is proposed in this paper for achieving the cascade utilization of energy. Parametric analyses were carried out in this paper to investigate the effect of four key parameters on the integration system performance using the control variable method. Meanwhile, the exergy analysis method based on the second law of thermodynamics was applied as a beneficial supplement to the energy analysis method to improve the evaluation of the system performance. The results show that the round-trip efficiency of the CH-CAES is greatly improved, also improving the energy utilization rate by integrating with the AHP. Under the fundamental working conditions, the round-trip efficiency and exergy efficiency of the CH-CAES-AHP increased by 29.96% and 1.87%, respectively, due to the integration system output being an additional 5790.53 kW heating power compared with the CH-CAES. The parametric analysis shows that the discharging pressure and the electrical heating temperature have a great influence on the performance of the integration system, while the rectification column pressure and the rectifier reflux ratio have little influence on the performance of the integration system. The parametric analysis also shows that the round-trip efficiency of the integration system is decreased with the discharging pressure and increased with the electrical heating temperature. Moreover, reducing the rectification column pressure and the rectifier reflux ratio can lead to more net heat being released by the ammonia absorption heat pump cycle and increasing the performance coefficient of the AHP; this is conducive to the improvement of the round-trip efficiency of the integration system. Simultaneously, the exergy efficiency of the integration system is increased with the discharging pressure and decreased with the electrical heating temperature, while the rectification column pressure and the rectifier reflux ratio have little influence on the exergy efficiency of the integration system.

Key words: compressed air energy storage, electrical heating, ammonia absorption cycle, thermodynamic analysis

CLC Number:

TK 02

Xuqing YANG, Zhenzhu YU, Xiaohu YANG, Zhan LIU. Combined heating and power system coupled with compressed air energy storage and absorption heat pump cycle[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2021, 10(1): 362-369.

Figures/Tables 12

Fig.1

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

References 15

1	LIU Zhan, YANG Xuqing, JIA Wenguang, et al. Thermodynamic study on a combined heat and compressed air energy storage system with a dual-pressure organic Rankine cycle[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020, 221: doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113141.
2	LIU Zhan, LIU Zihui, XIN Xuan, et al. Proposal and assessment of a novel carbon dioxide Energy storage system with electrical thermal storage and ejector condensing cycle: energy and exergy analysis[J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 269: doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115067.
3	王志文, 熊伟, 王海涛, 等. 水下压缩空气储能研究进展[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2015, 4(6): 585-598.
	WANG Zhiwen, XIONG Wei, WANG Haitao, et al. A review on underwater compressed air energy storage[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2015, 4(6): 12-18.
4	罗宁, 何青, 刘文毅. 压缩空气储能系统储气装置研究现状与分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2018, 7(3): 489-494.
	LUO Ning, HE Qing, LIU Wenyi. The development status and energy storage characteristic of gas storage device of compressed air energy storage system[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2018, 7(3): 489-494.
5	MENG Hui, WANG Meihong, ANEKE M, et al. Technical performance analysis and economic evaluation of a compressed air energy storage system integrated with an organic Rankine cycle[J]. Fuel, 2018, 211: 318-330.
6	张新敬, 陈海生, 刘金超, 等. 压缩空气储能技术研究进展[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2012, 1(1): 26-40.
	ZHANG Xinjing, CHEN Haisheng, LIU Jinchao, et al. Research progress in compressed air energy storage system: A review[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2012, 1(1): 26-40.
7	HAN Zhonghe, GUO Senchuang. Investigation of operation strategy of combined cooling, heating and power (CCHP) system based on advanced adiabatic compressed air energy storage[J]. Energy, 2018, 160: 290-308.
8	WANG Peizi, ZHAO Pan, LAI Yongquan, et al. Performance comparison of different combined heat and compressed air energy storage systems integrated with organic Rankine cycle[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2019, 43(14): 8410-8425.
9	WANG Peizi, ZHAO Pan, XU Wenpan, et al. Performance analysis of a combined heat and compressed air energy storage system with packed bed unit and electrical heater[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 162: doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114321.
10	WANG Peizi, ZHAO Pan, WANG Jiangfeng, et al. Performance evaluation of a combined heat and compressed air energy storage system integrated with ORC for scaling up storage capacity purpose[J]. Energy, 2020, 190: doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116405.
11	RAZMI A, SOLTANI M, TORABI M. Investigation of an efficient and environmentally-friendly CCHP system based on CAES, ORC and compression-absorption refrigeration cycle: energy and exergy analysis[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 195: 1199-1211.
12	RAZMI A, JANBAZ M. Exergoeconomic assessment with reliability consideration of a green cogeneration system based on compressed air energy storage (CAES)[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020, 204: doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112320.
13	蔡悠然, 李景翠, 刘辉, 等. 压缩空气储能与吸收式制冷联合运行系统及其㶲分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2018, 38(1): 186-194.
	CAI Youran, LI Jingcui, LIU Hui, et al. Exergy analysis of compressed air energy storage system combined with absorption chiller[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2018, 38(1): 186-194.
14	JI Wei, ZHOU Yuan, SUN Yu, et al. Thermodynamic analysis of a novel hybrid wind-solar-compressed air energy storage system[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 142: 176-187.
15	MOHAMAMDI A, MEHRPOOIA M. Exergy analysis and optimization of an integrated micro gas turbine, compressed air energy storage and solar dish collector process[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 139: 372-383.

参数	数值
环境温度/K	293.15
环境压力/kPa	101.3
储能压力/kPa	7200
释能压力/kPa	4600
电加热温度/K	573.15
膨胀机额定输出功率/kW	10000
冷却器夹点温差/K	20
再热器夹点温差/K	20
回热器夹点温差/K	20
溶液热交换器夹点温差/K	10
加热器夹点温差/K	10
压缩机等熵效率	0.84
膨胀机等熵效率	0.88
泵等熵效率	0.70
冷凝压力/kPa	1783
蒸发压力/kPa	616.3
精馏塔回流比	0.4
氨水浓溶液氨水溶度	0.4813

参数/指标	CH-CAES-AHP系统	CH-CAES系统
压缩机功率/kW	12322.49	12322.49
电加热器功率/kW	7005.58	7005.58
膨胀机功率/kW	10000	10000
供热量/kW	5790.53	0
供热?/kW	361.13	0
净放热量/kW	1301.43	0
系统循环效率η/%	81.70	51.74
系统?效率β/%	53.61	51.74

状态点	工作流体	温度/K	压力/kPa	质量流量/kg·s^-1	氨浓度/%
01	氨水	318.15	616.3	7.86	48.13
02	氨水	318.42	1783	7.86	48.13
03	氨水	361.70	1783	7.86	48.13
04	氨	320.41	1783	1.94	99.99
05	氨水	361.71	1783	8.33	50.20
06	氨	318.23	1783	0.78	99.99
07	氨水	379.62	1783	1.64	95.53
08	氨	318.23	1783	1.17	99.99
09	氨	283.24	616.3	1.17	99.99
010	氨	290.04	616.3	1.17	99.99
011	氨水	379.62	1783	6.69	39.10
012	氨水	328.42	1783	6.69	39.10
013	氨水	328.67	616.3	6.69	39.10

[1]	WU Yuting, KOU Zhenfeng, ZHANG Cancan, WU Yiyang. Analysis of the dynamic distribution parameters of a solid sodium chloride column heat exchanger [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(6): 1988-1995.
[2]	Di LIU, Tiantian ZHANG, Yuwei PENG, Xiaomei TANG, Dan WANG, Chengxiong MAO. Shaft modeling and oscillation analysis for expansion process of compressed air energy storage system [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(2): 563-572.
[3]	Qi XIA, Yang HE, Yujie XU, Haisheng CHEN, Jianqiang DENG. Matching performance between the trigeneration of an adiabatic compressed air energy storage system and load [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2021, 10(5): 1494-1502.
[4]	Dingzhang GUO, Zhao YIN, Xuezhi ZHOU, Yujie XU, Yong SHENG, Wenhui SUO, Haisheng CHEN. Status and prospect of gas storage device in compressed air energy storage system [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2021, 10(5): 1486-1493.
[5]	Shenghui ZHOU, Yang HE, Haisheng CHEN, Yujie XU, Jianqiang DENG. Using an ejector to intensify the charging process of a compressed air energy storage system [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2021, 10(5): 1503-1513.
[6]	Yang LI, Xinjing ZHANG, Jianfei SONG, Xiaoyu LI, Huan GUO, Yujie XU, Haisheng CHEN. Dynamic regulation and control of the discharge process in compressed air energy storage system [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2021, 10(5): 1514-1523.
[7]	Xing WANG, Wen LI, Yangli ZHU, Zhitao ZUO, Haisheng CHEN. Optimal design and flow loss reduction mechanism of bowed guide vane in a CAES axial flow turbine [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2021, 10(5): 1524-1535.
[8]	Ran XU, Zhitao ZUO, Ao LI, Xia WANG, Ming CHEN, Haisheng CHEN. Water evolution characteristics of piston compressors under varying operating conditions based on the moisture separation coefficient [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2021, 10(5): 1556-1564.
[9]	Shan HU, Chang LIU, Yujie XU, Haisheng CHEN, Huan GUO. Thermo-economic analysis of compressed air energy storage under peak load shaving condition [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2021, 10(5): 1607-1613.
[10]	Qihui YU, Li TIAN, Xiaofei LI, Xiaodong LI, Xin TAN, Yeming ZHANG. Compressed air energy storage capacity configuration and economic evaluation considering the uncertainty of wind energy [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2021, 10(5): 1614-1623.
[11]	Xu LIU, Xuqing YANG, Zhan LIU. A novel liquid energy storage system based on a carbon dioxide mixture [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2021, 10(5): 1806-1814.
[12]	Xiaolu WANG, Huan GUO, Hualiang ZHANG, Yujie XU, Yingjun LIU, Haisheng CHEN. Analysis of energy coupling characteristics between cogeneration units and compressed air energy storage integrated systems in thermal power plants [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2021, 10(2): 598-610.
[13]	Zhongming JIANG, Jing GUO, Dong TANG. A thermodynamic model of compressed humid air within an underground rock cavern for compressed air energy storage [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2021, 10(2): 638-646.
[14]	Fa WAN, Zhongming JIANG, Dong TANG. The influence of CAES reservoir design parameters on thermodynamic properties [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2021, 10(1): 370-378.
[15]	Lei HOU, Zichi WANG, Yingchao LI, Saihao WANG, Yajie ZHANG, Yusen ZHANG. Analysis and multi-objective optimization of CAES system [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2021, 10(1): 379-384.