Tightness analysis of hydrogen storage in bedded salt cavern under high-frequency injection and production

doi:10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2024.1147

Abstract

Abstract:

Hydrogen energy storage plays a crucial role in balancing the load of renewable energy sources. Owing to the intermittent and volatile nature of wind and solar energy, combined with the variability in hydrogen storage, salt cavern hydrogen storage usually covers a wide range of injection and production frequencies. These cycles can span weeks, months, quarters, or even years. This is a unique feature of hydrogen storage in salt caverns. However, the impact of varying frequencies on the tightness of salt cavern storage remains unclear and requires further investigation. This study aims to evaluate the effects of injection and production frequency, internal pressure of hydrogen storage, and burial depth on the tightness of salt caverns under high-frequency operational conditions. To achieve this, a two-cavity three-dimensional model of a salt cavern was established and simulated using FLAC3D.The key outputs include the hydrogen seepage range, interlayer pore pressure variation, and cumulated hydrogen leakage rate after 30 years of operation under various conditions. Based on this, the influence of various factors on the tightness of salt cavern is analyzed. The results show that the cumulative leakage of hydrogen increases as injection and production frequency rise. As the injection and production frequency increase, the interlayer pore pressure near the salt cavern area near the salt cavern decreases, while the interlayer pore pressure farther from the salt cavern rises. At the same frequency, hydrogen leakage rates also increase with greater burial depths. Furthermore, higher injection and production frequencies result in a lower minimum operating pressure for the salt cavern, which leads to increased hydrogen leakage. Interlayer permeability significantly impacts the air tightness of the salt cavern, with interlayer hydrogen leakage accounting for more than 90% of the total leakage. When salt cavern is used for hydrogen storage, the interlayer permeability should be less than 1.0×10^-18 m².

Key words: salt caverns hydrogen storage, high frequency injection-production, bedded salt rock, tightness evaluation

CLC Number:

TE 822

Fuzheng YANG, Kun YANG. Tightness analysis of hydrogen storage in bedded salt cavern under high-frequency injection and production[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2025, 14(5): 2023-2031.

Figures/Tables 13

Fig. 1

Table 1

Mechanical parameters of different rock formations[13]"

类型	孔隙率 $ϕ$ /%	渗透率k/m²
泥岩	0.03	1.0×10^-18
盐岩	0.01	1.0×10^-21
夹层1	0.03	1.0×10^-18
夹层2	0.01	1.0×10^-19

Table 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

Fig. 12

References 21

1	AFTAB A, HASSANPOURYOUZBAND A, NADERI H, et al. Quantifying onshore salt deposits and their potential for hydrogen energy storage in Australia[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2023, 65: 107252. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2023.107252.
2	ZHENG Y L, WANYAN Q Q, QIU X S, et al. New technologies for site selection and evaluation of salt-cavern underground gas storages[J]. Natural Gas Industry B, 2020, 7(1): 40-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.ngib.2019.06.002.
3	CAGLAYAN D G, WEBER N, HEINRICHS H U, et al. Technical potential of salt Caverns for hydrogen storage in Europe[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(11): 6793-6805. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.161.
4	BÖTTCHER N, GÖRKE U J, KOLDITZ O, et al. Thermo-mechanical investigation of salt Caverns for short-term hydrogen storage[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2017, 76(3): 98. DOI: 10.1007/s12665-017-6414-2.
5	REITENBACH V, GANZER L, ALBRECHT D, et al. Influence of added hydrogen on underground gas storage: A review of key issues[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015, 73(11): 6927-6937. DOI: 10.1007/s12665-015-4176-2.
6	TARKOWSKI R, CZAPOWSKI G. Salt domes in Poland-Potential sites for hydrogen storage in Caverns[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(46): 21414-21427. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.212.
7	OSMAN A I, MEHTA N, ELGARAHY A M, et al. Hydrogen production, storage, utilisation and environmental impacts: A review[J]. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 2022, 20(1): 153-188. DOI: 10.1007/s10311-021-01322-8.
8	ZHANG X, LIU W, JIANG D Y, et al. Investigation on the influences of interlayer contents on stability and usability of energy storage Caverns in bedded rock salt[J]. Energy, 2021, 231: 120968. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120968.
9	SIMBECK D R. CO₂ capture and storage-the essential bridge to the hydrogen economy[C]//Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies-6th International Conference. Pergamon, 2003: 25-30.
10	XIAO N, LIANG W G, ZHANG S L. Feasibility analysis of a single-well retreating horizontal cavern for natural gas storage in bedded salt rock[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2022, 99: 104446. DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104446.
11	MATON J P, ZHAO L, BROUWER J. Dynamic modeling of compressed gas energy storage to complement renewable wind power intermittency[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(19): 7867-7880. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.04.030.
12	CHEN J, LU D, LIU W, et al. Stability study and optimization design of small-spacing two-well (SSTW) salt Caverns for natural gas storages[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2020, 27: 101131. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2019.101131.
13	ZHANG Z X, LIU W, GUO Q, et al. Tightness evaluation and countermeasures for hydrogen storage salt cavern contains various lithological interlayers[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2022, 50: 104454. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2022.104454.
14	WANG J B, WANG X P, ZHANG Q, et al. Dynamic prediction model for surface settlement of horizontal salt rock energy storage[J]. Energy, 2021, 235: 121421. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy. 2021.121421.
15	葛家理, 宁正福, 刘月田, 等. 现代油藏渗流力学原理[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2001.
	GE J L, NING Z F, LIU Y T, et al. The modern mechanics of fluids flow in oil reservoir[M]. Beijing: Petroleam Industry Press, 2001.
16	WU D, WANG J G, HU B W, et al. A coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical model for evaluating air leakage from an unlined compressed air energy storage cavern[J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 146: 907-920. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.034.
17	CHEN X S, LI Y P, JIANG Y L, et al. Theoretical research on gas seepage in the formations surrounding bedded gas storage salt cavern[J]. Petroleum Science, 2022, 19(4): 1766-1778. DOI: 10.1016/j.petsci.2022.01.021.
18	ZHANG N, SHI X L, ZHANG Y, et al. Tightness analysis of underground natural gas and oil storage Caverns with limit pillar widths in bedded rock salt[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 12130-12145.
19	LIU W, ZHANG Z X, CHEN J, et al. Feasibility evaluation of large-scale underground hydrogen storage in bedded salt rocks of China: A case study in Jiangsu province[J]. Energy, 2020, 198: 117348. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117348.
20	LIU W, DONG Y K, ZHANG Z X, et al. Optimization of operating pressure of hydrogen storage salt cavern in bedded salt rock with multi-interlayers[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 58: 974-986. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.01.318.
21	BAGCI A S, OZTURK E. Performance prediction of underground gas storage in salt Caverns[J]. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 2007, 2(2): 155-165. DOI: 10.1080/15567240500402693.

[1]	Yongmao HAO, Kan REN, Chuanzhi CUI, Zhongwei WU. Optimization of cushion gas types and injection production parameters for underground hydrogen storage in aquifers [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(9): 2881-2887.
[2]	Jiamin LU, Junhui XU, Weidong WANG, Hao WANG, Zijun XU, Liuping CHEN. Development of large-scale underground hydrogen storage technology [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(11): 3699-3707.