基于大平板热管的电池热管理实验及仿真

doi:10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2021.0092

储能科学与技术 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (4): 1364-1373.doi: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2021.0092

基于大平板热管的电池热管理实验及仿真

刘彬^1,²(), 胡子强^1,², 李夔宁^1,², 谢翌³, 郑锦涛³

^1.重庆大学低品位能源利用技术及系统教育部重点实验室
^2.重庆大学能源与动力工程学院
^3.重庆大学机械与运载工程学院，重庆 400044

收稿日期:2021-03-10 修回日期:2021-03-21 出版日期:2021-07-05 发布日期:2021-06-25
通讯作者: 刘彬 E-mail:liubin0921@cqu.edu.cn
作者简介:刘彬（1981—），男，副教授，研究方向为传热传质、汽车热管理，E-mail：liubin0921@cqu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
高性能纯电动运动型多功能汽车（SUV）开发(2018YFB0106100);新能源汽车高效整车一体化热管理系统的研究(KJQN201800121);中央高校项目(2020CDJGFCG009)

Experimental and simulation on battery thermal management based on a large flat heat pipe

Bin LIU^1,²(), Ziqiang HU^1,², Kuining LI^1,², Yi XIE³, Jintao ZHENG³

^1.Key Laboratory of Low-grade Energy Utilization Technology and System of Ministry of Education, Chongqing University
^2.School of Energy and Power Engineering, Chongqing University
^3.College of College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China

Received:2021-03-10 Revised:2021-03-21 Online:2021-07-05 Published:2021-06-25
Contact: Bin LIU E-mail:liubin0921@cqu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

热特性是影响锂离子电池性能的主要因素之一，当电池以较高倍率进行充放电时，热量聚集使温度迅速上升，影响电池性能，甚至会产生燃烧或爆炸。本工作搭建了一种基于大平板热管的高效高均温性电池散热模型。电池组置于大平板热管上，底部辅以风冷散热，在不同工况下对电池表面平均温度及最大温差进行数值计算，并通过实验验证了热管理模型准确性。结果表明，当环境温度为20 ℃、冷却风速为5 m/s、以1 C放电至截止电压时，电池组平均温度为38 ℃，最大温差为1.9 ℃；在大平板热管散热端适量布置翅片可增大换热面积，提高换热效率。

关键词: 脉冲电流法, 大平板热管, 均温性, 风冷散热

Abstract:

Thermal characteristics are a major factor affecting the performance of lithium-ion batteries. When a battery is charged and discharged at a high rate, heat accumulation causes the temperature to rise rapidly, affecting the battery performance and even causing the danger of combustion or explosion. In this study, the heat generation mechanism of lithium-ion batteries is studied by combining theory with experiment. The HPPC pulse current method is used to identify the internal ohmic resistance and internal polarization resistance of the battery offline, and the heat transfer coefficient of the flat heat pipe is identified by the least square method. Under various working conditions, the average temperature and the maximum temperature difference at the battery surface were calculated, and the accuracy of the thermal management model was experimentally verified. At an ambient temperature of 20 ℃, a cooling wind speed of 5 m/s, and the discharge of the battery pack at the cut-off voltage of 1 C, the average temperature of the battery pack is 38 ℃, and the maximum temperature difference is 1.9 ℃. When the heat exchange area increases, the heat exchange efficiency improves. This research promotes the application of flat heat pipes in the heat dissipation of power batteries and provides a basis for ensuring the safety and efficiency of batteries under high-rate charging and discharging.

Key words: the hybrid pulse power characterization, large flat heat pipe, temperature uniformity, air-cooling

中图分类号:

TM 911

刘彬, 胡子强, 李夔宁, 谢翌, 郑锦涛. 基于大平板热管的电池热管理实验及仿真[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(4): 1364-1373.

Bin LIU, Ziqiang HU, Kuining LI, Yi XIE, Jintao ZHENG. Experimental and simulation on battery thermal management based on a large flat heat pipe[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2021, 10(4): 1364-1373.

图/表 21

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

表2

表3

表4

图5

图6

图7

表5

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

图13

图14

表6

图15

参考文献 19

1	朱茂桃, 邵瑜, 徐晓明. 平面热管与液冷作用下锂离子电池热管理系统散热特性[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2019, 19(36): 343-348.
	ZHU M T, SHAO Y, XU X M. Heat dissipation characteristics of lithium-ion battery thermal management system under the action of flat plate heat pipe and liquid cooling[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2019, 19(36): 343-348.
2	CHOUCHANE M, RUCCI A, LOMBARDO T, et al. Lithium ion battery electrodes predicted from manufacturing simulations: Assessing the impact of the carbon-binder spatial location on the electrochemical performance[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2019, 444: 227-235.
3	SPIELBAUER M, BERG P, RINGAT M, et al. Experimental study of the impedance behavior of 18650 lithium-ion battery cells under deforming mechanical abuse[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2019, 26: doi: 10.1016/j.est.2019.101039.
4	LIU Y, YANG B, DONG X, et al. A simple prelithiation strategy to build a high-rate and long-life lithium-ion battery with improved low-temperature performance[J]. Angewandte Chemie (International Ed in English), 2017, 56(52): 16606-16610.
5	赵国柱, 招晓荷, 徐晓明, 等. 基于最小能耗的动力电池风冷控制策略[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2019, 8(4): 751-758.
	ZHAO G Z, ZHAO X H, XU X M, et al. Air cooling strategy of power battery based on minimum energy consumption[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2019, 8(4): 751-758.
6	FAN Y Q, BAO Y, LING C, et al. Experimental study on the thermal management performance of air cooling for high energy density cylindrical lithium-ion batteries[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 155: 96-109.
7	ZHENG N B, FAN R J, SUN Z Q, et al. Thermal management performance of a fin-enhanced phase change material system for the lithium-ion battery[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2020, 44(9): 7617-7629.
8	ZOU D Q, LIU X S, HE R J, et al. Preparation of a novel composite phase change material (PCM) and its locally enhanced heat transfer for power battery module[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 180: 1196-1202.
9	YU G Y, CHIANG S W, CHEN W, et al. Thermal management of a Li-ion battery for electric vehicles using PCM and water-cooling board[J]. Key Engineering Materials, 2019, 814: 307-313.
10	TANG Y, TANG H, LI J, et al. Experimental investigation of capillary force in a novel sintered copper mesh wick for ultra-thin heat pipes[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 115: 1020-1030.
11	周鑫晨, 章学来, 韩兴超, 等. 脉动热管/相变储能耦合技术研究进展[J]. 现代化工, 2018, 38(12): 58-61, 63.
	ZHOU X C, ZHANG X L, HAN X C, et al. Review on coupling technology between pulsating heat pipe and phase change energy storage[J]. Modern Chemical Industry, 2018, 38(12): 58-61, 63.
12	田晟, 肖佳将. 基于正交层次法的锂离子电池热管散热模组数值模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(8): 3510-3517.
	TIAN S, XIAO J J. Numerical simulation and analysis of lithium-ion battery heat pipe cooling module based on orthogonal analytic hierarchy process[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(8): 3510-3517.
13	JIN X R, DUAN X T, JIANG W J, et al. Structural design of a composite board/heat pipe based on the coupled electro-chemical-thermal model in battery thermal management system[J]. Energy, 2021, 216: doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.119234.
14	张靖周. 高等传热学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009.
	ZHANG J Z. Advanced heat transfer[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2009.
15	AN Z J, JIA L, WEI L T, et al. Investigation on lithium-ion battery electrochemical and thermal characteristic based on electrochemical-thermal coupled model[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 137: 792-807.
16	SRINIVASAN V, WANG C Y. Analysis of electrochemical and thermal behavior of Li-ion cells[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2003, 150(1): doi: 10.1149/1.1526512.
17	WANG Z Q, CHEN Y X, LI Y. Development of RC model for thermal dynamic analysis of buildings through model structure simplification[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2019, 195: 51-67.
18	NELSON P, DEES D, AMINE K, et al. Modeling thermal management of lithium-ion PNGV batteries[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2002, 110(2): 349-356.
19	WANG Z Q, CHEN Y X, LI Y. Development of RC model for thermal dynamic analysis of buildings through model structure simplification[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2019, 195: 51-67.

参数	数值	参数	数值
尺寸/mm	149×27×97	恒压最大充电电压/V	4.2
重量/kg	0.84	放电终止电压/V	2.75
标称电压/V	3.7	最大充电倍率/C	1
标称容量/A·h	50	—	—

方案	网格数量/个	壁面平均温度/K
1	131054	42.3
2	251438	44.6
3	483461	44.3
4	813278	44.7

仿真条件	参数值
入口边界条件	速度入口
出口边界条件	压力出口
放电倍率/C	0.5	0.6	0.7	0.8
环境温度/℃	20	25	30	35	40
进口风速/m·s^-1	2	3	4	5

单体编号	最高温度/℃	最低温度/℃	温差/℃
1	43.9	42.9	1.0
2	44.6	44.3	0.3
3	45.1	44.5	0.6
4	45.1	44.0	1.1

工况	数值					环境温度/℃
不同放电倍率(绝热)/C	0.5	0.6	0.8	1		30
不同放电倍率(热管散热)/C	0.5	0.6	0.8	1		30
不同环境温度(放电倍率1C)/℃	20	25	30	35	40	-

基于大平板热管的电池热管理实验及仿真

Experimental and simulation on battery thermal management based on a large flat heat pipe

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 21

参考文献 19

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

评价指标	入风口风速/m·s^-1
评价指标	2	3	4	5
最高温度/℃	48.7	46.7	45.8	45.1
最低温度/℃	45.2	44.0	43.5	42.9
平均温度/℃	47.9	45.6	43.8	43.2
最大温差/℃	3.5	2.7	2.3	2.2