碳捕捉对废弃混凝土复合相变储热材料性能的影响

doi:10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2023.0685

储能科学与技术 ›› 2023, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (12): 3709-3719.doi: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2023.0685

碳捕捉对废弃混凝土复合相变储热材料性能的影响

田曦¹(), 熊亚选¹(), 任静², 赵彦琦³, 晋世豪⁴, 李烁¹, 杨洋¹, 丁玉龙⁵

^1.北京建筑大学供热供燃气通风及空调工程北京市重点实验室，北京 100044
^2.北京中建建筑科学研究院有限公司，北京 100076
^3.南京工业大学能源科学与工程学院，江苏南京 211816
^4.国家电网河南省禹州市供电公司，河南许昌 461670
^5.伯明翰大学伯明翰储能中心，伯明翰 B15 2TT

收稿日期:2023-09-30 修回日期:2023-10-11 出版日期:2023-12-05 发布日期:2023-12-09
通讯作者: 熊亚选 E-mail:TX17731114603@163.com;xiongyaxuan@bucea.edu.cn
作者简介:田曦（1998—），男，硕士研究生，主要从事固废储热方面的研究，E-mail：TX17731114603@163.com；
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(52006008);北京市教委科研项目(KM201910016011);北京建筑大学科学研究基金(Z13086)

Effect of carbon sequestration on the performance of waste concrete shape-stable phase change composites

Xi TIAN¹(), Yaxuan XIONG¹(), Jing REN², Yanqi ZHAO³, Shihao JIN⁴, Shuo LI¹, Yang YANG¹, Yulong DING⁵

^1.Beijing Key Lab of Heating, Gas Supply, Ventilating and Air Conditioning Engineering, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China
^2.Beijing Building Research Institute CO. , LTD. of CSCEC, Beijing 100076, China
^3.School of Energy Science and Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, Jiangsu, China
^4.State Grid Henan Provincial Power Company Yuzhou Power Supply Company, Xuchang 461670, Henan, China
^5.Birmingham Center for Energy storage, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK

Received:2023-09-30 Revised:2023-10-11 Online:2023-12-05 Published:2023-12-09
Contact: Yaxuan XIONG E-mail:TX17731114603@163.com;xiongyaxuan@bucea.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为充分资源化利用废弃混凝土，捕捉和储存CO₂，本工作利用废弃混凝土进行碳捕捉，分别采用经固碳和未固碳废弃混凝土为骨架材料，硝酸钠为相变材料，制备出了7种不同质量配比的复合相变储热材料。研究结果表明，废弃混凝土在最佳实验工况下固碳效率高达24.7%；在添加相同质量分数的相变材料情况下，固碳复合相变储热材料的熔化潜热高于未固碳复合相变储热材料；样品SS2的抗压强度高达121.54 MPa，固碳废弃混凝土及其复合相变储热材料的抗压强度均有较大提升，最高热导率[0.648 W/(m·K)]低于未固碳样品[0.884 W/(m·K)]；固碳前后的废弃混凝土骨架材料均与相变材料颗粒结合致密，材料各组分间的化学相容性较好。

关键词: 废弃混凝土, 固碳, 骨架材料, 复合相变储热材料, 储热

Abstract:

In order to fully resource the use of waste concrete to capture and store CO₂, this paper utilizes waste concrete for carbon capture, and seven composite phase change heat storage materials with different mass ratios were prepared by using carbon consolidated and unconsolidated waste. Results indicate that the carbon sequestration efficiency of the waste concrete was as high as 24.7% under the specific experimental conditions. The latent heat of melting of the shape-stable phase change composites prepared by carbon sequestration was higher than that before carbon sequestration after adding the same mass fraction of phase change material. The compressive strength of SS2 was as high as 121.54 MPa, and the compressive strengths of both the carbon sequestered waste concrete and shape-stable phase change composites were significantly increased, with the highest thermal conductivity [0.648 W/(m·K)] being lower than that of the un-sequestered sample [0.884 W/(m·K)]. The shape-stable phase change composites before and after carbon sequestration had good chemical compatibility among the components, and the phase change materials were densely bonded with the skeleton materials.

Key words: waste concrete, carbon sequestration, skeleton material, shape-stable phase change composites, energy storage

中图分类号:

TB 332

田曦, 熊亚选, 任静, 赵彦琦, 晋世豪, 李烁, 杨洋, 丁玉龙. 碳捕捉对废弃混凝土复合相变储热材料性能的影响[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(12): 3709-3719.

Xi TIAN, Yaxuan XIONG, Jing REN, Yanqi ZHAO, Shihao JIN, Shuo LI, Yang YANG, Yulong DING. Effect of carbon sequestration on the performance of waste concrete shape-stable phase change composites[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(12): 3709-3719.

图/表 15

图1

表1

图2

图3

表2

图4

表3

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

参考文献 31

1	朱芳啟, 江龙, 王丽伟, 等. MnCl₂-CaCl₂-NH₃再吸附温度提升系统储能特性[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(4): 1453-1458.
	ZHU F Q, JIANG L, WANG L W, et al. Energy storage properties of MnCl₂-CaCl₂-NH₃ resorption temperature-lifting system[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(4): 1453-1458.
2	JIANG Y F, LIU M, SUN Y P. Review on the development of high temperature phase change material composites for solar thermal energy storage[J]. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2019, 203: 110164.
3	LI Q, LI C, DU Z, et al. A review of performance investigation and enhancement of shell and tube thermal energy storage device containing molten salt based phase change materials for medium and high temperature applications[J]. Applied Energy, 2019, 255: 113806.
4	YU Q H, JIANG Z, CONG L, et al. A novel low-temperature fabrication approach of composite phase change materials for high temperature thermal energy storage[J]. Applied Energy, 2019, 237: 367-377.
5	LI Q, CONG L, ZHANG X S, et al. Fabrication and thermal properties investigation of aluminium based composite phase change material for medium and high temperature thermal energy storage[J]. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2020, 211: 110511.
6	ZHU J Q, LI R G, ZHOU W B, et al. Fabrication of Al₂O₃-NaCl composite heat storage materials by one-step synthesis method[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Mater Sci Ed, 2016, 31(5): 950-954.
7	SARI A, BICER A, AL-SULAIMAN F A, et al. Diatomite/CNTs/PEG composite PCMs with shape-stabilized and improved thermal conductivity: Preparation and thermal energy storage properties[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2018, 164: 166-175.
8	XU G Z, LENG G H, YANG C Y, et al. Sodium nitrate-diatomite composite materials for thermal energy storage[J]. Solar Energy, 2017, 146: 494-502.
9	LI C C, ZHANG B, LIU Q X. N-eicosane/expanded graphite as composite phase change materials for electro-driven thermal energy storage[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2020, 29: 101339.
10	闫嘉森, 韩现英, 党兆涵, 等. 石蜡/膨胀石墨/石墨烯复合相变储热材料的制备及性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2022, 43(6): 326-332.
	YAN J S, HAN X Y, DANG Z H, et al. Preparation and performance of paraffin/expanded graphite/graphene composite phase change heat storage material[J]. Chemical Journal of Chinese Universities, 2022, 43(6): 326-332.
11	JIANG Z, JIANG F, LI C A, et al. A form stable composite phase change material for thermal energy storage applications over 700 ℃[J]. Applied Sciences, 2019, 9(5): 814.
12	卢昀坤, 唐宪友, 尹航, 等. 高温熔盐/陶瓷复合相变储热材料表面封装及防泄漏性能研究[J]. 无机盐工业, 2023: doi: 10.19964/j.issn. 1006-4990.2023-0158.
13	MEMON S, LIAO W Y, YANG S Q, et al. Development of composite PCMs by incorporation of paraffin into various building materials[J]. Materials, 2015, 8(2): 499-518.
14	SARI A, BIÇER A. Preparation and thermal energy storage properties of building material-based composites as novel form-stable PCMs[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2012, 51: 73-83.
15	DENG J H, LI W B, JIANG D H. Study on binary fatty acids/sepiolite composite phase change material[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2011, 374/375/376/377: 807-810.
16	LIU R P, ZHANG F, SU W M, et al. Impregnation of porous mullite with Na₂SO₄ phase change material for thermal energy storage[J]. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2015, 134: 268-274.
17	LI C, HAN L, LENG G Y, et al. Nitrate salt-halloysite nanotube (HNT) composite phase change materials for thermal energy storage: The feasibility of material fabrication by using HNT as skeleton substance and its thermal properties[J]. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2023(263): 112565.
18	林伯, 句子涵, 胡定华, 等. 基于泡沫铜骨架高导热复合相变储热材料的热性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2022, 36(S1): 29-33.
	LIN B, GOU Z H, HU D H, et al. Research on thermal performance of high thermal conductivity composite phase change material based on foamed copper framework material[J]. Materials Reports, 2022, 36(S1): 29-33.
19	YAN X X, ZHAO H B, FENG Y H, et al. Excellent heat transfer and phase transformation performance of erythritol/graphene composite phase change materials[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2022, 228: 109435.
20	WANG T Y, ZHANG T Y, XU G Z, et al. A new low-cost high-temperature shape-stable phase change material based on coal fly ash and K₂CO₃[J]. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2020, 206: 110328.
21	王燕, 黄云, 姚华, 等. 太阳盐/钢渣定型复合相变储热材料的制备与性能研究[J]. 过程工程学报, 2021, 21(3): 332-340.
	WANG Y, HUANG Y, YAO H, et al. Fabrication and characterization of form-stable solar salt/steel slag composite phase change material for thermal energy storage[J]. The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering, 2021, 21(3): 332-340.
22	XIONG Y X, WANG H X, WU Y T, et al. Carbide slag based shape-stable phase change materials for waste recycling and thermal energy storage[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2022, 50: 104256.
23	XIONG Y X, TIAN X, LI X, et al. Effects of expanded graphite on NaNO₃/semi-coke ash shape-stable phase change composites for thermal energy storage[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2023, 72: 108648.
24	XIONG Y X, YAO C H, REN J, et al. Waste semicoke ash utilized to fabricate shape-stable phase change composites for building heating and cooling[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 361: 129638.
25	XIONG Y X, SONG C Y, REN J, et al. Sludge-incinerated ash based shape-stable phase change composites for heavy metal fixation and building thermal energy storage[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2022, 162: 346-356.
26	LEUNG D Y C, CARAMANNA G, MAROTO-VALER M M. An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 39: 426-443.
27	XIONG Y X, SUN M Y, WU Y T, et al. Effects of synthesis methods on thermal performance of nitrate salt nanofluids for concentrating solar power[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2020, 34(9): 11606-11619.
28	ZHAO T K, SHE S F, JI X L, et al. Expanded graphite embedded with aluminum nanoparticles as superior thermal conductivity anodes for high-performance lithium-ion batteries[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 33833.
29	RADHAKRISHNAN R, GUBBINS K E. Free energy studies of freezing in slit pores: An order-parameter approach using Monte Carlo simulation[J]. Molecular Physics, 1999, 96(8): 1249-1267.
30	张东, 吴科如. 孔结构对有机相变物质相变行为的调节作用[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2004(9): 1163-1167.
	ZHANG D, WU K R. Tuning effect of porous structure on phase changing behavior of organic phase changing matters[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2004(9): 1163-1167.
31	LI R G, ZHU J Q, ZHOU W B, et al. Thermal compatibility of sodium nitrate/expanded perlite composite phase change materials[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 103: 452-458.

样品	废弃混凝土/%	NaNO₃/%	烧结后形貌	样品	固碳后废弃混凝土/%	NaNO₃/%	烧结后形貌
SS1	70	30	成型良好	C-SS1	70	30	成型良好
SS2	60	40	成型良好	C-SS2	60	40	成型良好
SS3	55	45	成型较好	C-SS3	55	45	成型良好
SS4	50	50	成型较好，轻微熔盐泄漏	C-SS4	50	50	有开裂趋势
SS5	45	55	样品表面鼓包	C-SS5	45	55	样品开裂
SS6	40	60	样品胀大	C-SS6	40	60	样品开裂
SS7	30	70	样品严重损坏	C-SS7	30	70	样品变形

[1]	孛衍君, 薛新杰, 王化宁, 赵长颖. 基于相变堆积床的卡诺电池系统设计与实验研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(9): 2823-2832.
[2]	张雪龄, 叶强, 谷军恒, 荀浩云, 张琦, 程传晓, 金听祥, 张业强. MgSO₄-LiCl@MEG复合储热材料的制备与吸附储热性能[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(9): 2778-2788.
[3]	尹航, 汤建方, 张继, 颜豪, 胡晓睿, 王澍. 电力现货市场中新能源-光热联合发电系统的储热系统容量优化配置[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(9): 2842-2853.
[4]	胡茜芮, 张朝阳, 洪芳军. 高温相变胶囊梯级储热系统实验研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(8): 2526-2535.
[5]	黄渭彬, 张彪, 范金成, 杨伟, 邹汉波, 陈胜洲. ZIF-8复合PEO基固态电解质的制备与改性研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(4): 1083-1092.
[6]	廖丹, 胡章茂, 王唯, 田红, 宣艳妮, 陈冬林. 立方体填充料结构内换热与流动特性[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(3): 676-684.
[7]	刘伟, 李振明, 刘铭扬, 杨岑玉, 梅超, 李迎. 高温相变储热材料制备与应用研究进展[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(2): 398-430.
[8]	戴宇成, 王增鹏, 刘凯豹, 赵佳腾, 刘昌会. 基于相变材料的储热器及其传热强化研究进展[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(2): 431-458.
[9]	张岩岩, 熊亚选, 陈亚辉, 全瑞星, 程广贵, 赵彦琦, 丁玉龙. 相变填充床储热系统研究与应用进展[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(12): 3852-3872.
[10]	韩瑞, 廖志荣, 于博旭, 徐超, 巨星. 面向火电厂改造的熔盐卡诺电池储能系统仿真研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(12): 3605-3615.
[11]	陈红兵, 李春阳, 王聪聪, 李璊, 卢浩阳, 刘宇航, 张岩. 应用于低温集热蓄热的二十二烷-十二醇复合相变材料的制备和性能[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(12): 3663-3669.
[12]	葛继翔, 纪明希, 丁玉龙, 罗伊默, 王利明. 水合盐热化学反应器参数优化与供暖应用案例分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(12): 3799-3807.
[13]	杨洋, 熊亚选, 任静, 赵彦琦, 李烁, 田曦, 丁玉龙. 碳捕捉对电石渣-钢渣复合相变储热材料性能的影响[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(12): 3690-3698.
[14]	袁子鸥, 王峰, 祁星朝, 张琦, 马瑞. 应用于储热领域的混合钠基废盐热物性分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(12): 3616-3626.
[15]	刘洁, 杨英英, 李爱征, 王文松, 任燕. 用于地板辐射采暖的多元水合盐复合相变砂浆的制备及性能研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(12): 3655-3662.

碳捕捉对废弃混凝土复合相变储热材料性能的影响

Effect of carbon sequestration on the performance of waste concrete shape-stable phase change composites

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 15

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

序号	反应气氛	温度/℃	粒径/μm	液固比/(mL/g)	搅拌速度/(r/min)	反应时间/min	气体流速/(L/min)	固碳效率/%
1	纯CO₂	30	270	20	430	60	3	12.19
2	纯CO₂	30	150	20	430	60	3	15.15
3	纯CO₂	30	75	20	430	60	3	19.01
4	纯CO₂	30	75	10	430	60	3	11.10
5	纯CO₂	30	75	15	430	60	3	15.49
6	纯CO₂	30	75	20	2600	60	3	23.78
7	纯CO₂	30	75	20	430	60	2	17.88
8	纯CO₂	30	75	20	430	60	1	22.7
9	纯CO₂	30	75	20	430	40	3	27.55
10	纯CO₂	30	75	20	430	20	3	19.69
11	纯CO₂	30	75	20	2600	40	1	38.92