A study on dissolution of transition metal ions and influence on the cycling performance of LiMn0.6Fe0.4PO4

doi:10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2024.0649

Abstract

Abstract:

∶By disassembling lithium ferric manganese phosphate (LMFP) batteries with different cycles, the relationship between the deposition of Mn and Fe in the negative electrode and the cycle was obtained. The results showed that the deposition of Mn in the negative electrode of LMFP increased linearly with the increase of cycles, while the deposition of Fe in the negative electrode remained unchanged and was at the same level as that of lithium iron phosphate (LFP). The properties of positive and negative electrodes at the beginning of the cycle life (BOL) and the end of the cycle life (EOL) were characterized using the capacity recovery test, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The results showed that the structure of LMFP cathode material is relatively stable during the cycle, and the capacity loss primarily occurs in the negative electrode. A small amount of Mn²⁺ dissolved from the positive electrode of LMFP migrates and deposits to the negative electrode, catalyzing the decomposition of electrolytes and lithium salt and resulting in a large amount of active lithium loss. Simultaneously, the negative electrode impedance increases and finally shows a significant decline in circulation capacity.

Key words: lithium ferric manganese phosphate, dissolution of transition metal ions, cycle performance, active lithium loss, interface chemistry

CLC Number:

TQ 152

Fanfeng LIU, Tingting WU, Shengyao WEN, Jianhang GAO, Meng CHEN, Chi LI. A study on dissolution of transition metal ions and influence on the cycling performance of LiMn_0.6Fe_0.4PO₄[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2025, 14(1): 13-20.

Figures/Tables 10

Table 1

Table 2

Fig.1

Table 3

Fig.2

Table 4

Table 5

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

References 24

1	PADHI A K, NANJUNDASWAMY K S, GOODENOUGH J B. Phospho-olivines as positive-electrode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1997, 144(4): 1188. DOI: 10.1149/1.1837571.
2	TANG Y X, ZHANG Y Y, LI W L, et al. Rational material design for ultrafast rechargeable lithium-ion batteries[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2015, 44(17): 5926-5940. DOI: 10.1039/c4cs00442f.
3	MARTHA S, GRINBLAT J, HAIK O, et al. LiMn_0.8Fe_0.2PO₄: An advanced cathode material for rechargeable lithium batteries[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2009, 48(45): 8559-8563. DOI: 10.1002/anie.200903587.
4	ARAVINDAN V, GNANARAJ J, LEE Y S, et al. LiMnPO₄–A next generation cathode material for lithium-ion batteries[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2013, 1(11): 3518-3539. DOI: 10.1039/C2TA01393B.
5	OSORIO-GUILLÉN J M, HOLM B, AHUJA R, et al. A theoretical study of olivine LiMPO₄ cathodes[J]. Solid State Ionics, 2004, 167(3/4): 221-227. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2003.09.015.
6	GOODENOUGH J B, PARK K S. The Li-ion rechargeable battery: A perspective[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2013, 135(4): 1167-1176. DOI: 10.1021/ja3091438.
7	NISHIMURA S I, KOBAYASHI G, OHOYAMA K, et al. Experimental visualization of lithium diffusion in LixFePO₄[J]. Nature Materials, 2008, 7(9): 707-711. DOI: 10.1038/nmat2251.
8	JENSEN K M Ø, CHRISTENSEN M, GUNNLAUGSSON H P, et al. Defects in hydrothermally synthesized LiFePO₄ and LiFe_1- xMnxPO₄ cathode materials[J]. Chemistry of Materials, 2013, 25(11): 2282-2290. DOI: 10.1021/cm4008393.
9	AN L W, LIU H, LIU Y Y, et al. The best addition of graphene to LiMn_0.7Fe_0.3PO₄/C cathode material synthesized by wet ball milling combined with spray drying method[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2018, 767: 315-322. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.043.
10	CHOI W, MANTHIRAM A. Comparison of metal ion dissolutions from lithium ion battery cathodes[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2006, 153(9): A1760. DOI: 10.1149/1.2219710.
11	PIECZONKA N P W, LIU Z Y, LU P, et al. Understanding transition-metal dissolution behavior in LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ high-voltage spinel for lithium ion batteries[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2013, 117(31): 15947-15957. DOI: 10.1021/jp405158m.
12	GILBERT J A, SHKROB I A, ABRAHAM D P. Transition metal dissolution, ion migration, electrocatalytic reduction and capacity loss in lithium-ion full cells[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2017, 164(2): A389-A399. DOI: 10.1149/2.1111702jes.
13	周格. 锂离子电池失效分析—过渡金属溶解沉积及产气研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学(中国科学院物理研究所), 2019.
	ZHOU G. Failure analysis of lithium-ion batteries— Study on dissolution and deposition of transition metals and gas production[D]. Beijing: Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Science, 2019.
14	YANG L, TAKAHASHI M, WANG B F. A study on capacity fading of lithium-ion battery with manganese spinel positive electrode during cycling[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2006, 51(16): 3228-3234. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.09.014.
15	EVERTZ M, HORSTHEMKE F, KASNATSCHEEW J, et al. Unraveling transition metal dissolution of Li_1.04Ni_1/3Co_1/3Mn_1/3O₂ (NCM 111) in lithium ion full cells by using the total reflection X-ray fluorescence technique[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2016, 329: 364-371. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.099.
16	EVERTZ M, KASNATSCHEEW J, WINTER M, et al. Investigation of various layered lithium ion battery cathode materials by plasma- and X-ray-based element analytical techniques[J]. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2019, 411(1): 277-285. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-018-1441-8.
17	XU W Q, ZHENG Y H, CHENG Y, et al. Understanding the effect of Al doping on the electrochemical performance improvement of the LiMn₂O₄ cathode material[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2021, 13(38): 45446-45454. DOI: 10.1021/acsami. 1c11315.
18	XIAO L F, ZHAO Y Q, YANG Y Y, et al. Enhanced electrochemical stability of Al-doped LiMn₂O₄ synthesized by a polymer-pyrolysis method[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2008, 54(2): 545-550. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.07.037.
19	TANG X Y, ZHOU J, BAI M, et al. Investigation of the self-discharge behaviors of the LiMn₂O₄ cathode at elevated temperatures: in situ X-ray diffraction analysis and a co-doping mitigation strategy[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2019, 7(21): 13364-13371. DOI: 10.1039/C9TA02718A.
20	LI P W, LUO S H, WANG J C, et al. Preparation and electrochemical properties of Al-F-co-doped spinel LiMn₂O₄ single-crystal material for lithium-ion battery[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2021, 45(15): 21158-21169. DOI: 10.1002/er.7169.
21	DE TAEYE L L, TEIRLYNCK I, VEREECKEN P M. The role of electronic junctions in artificial interface engineering: The case for indium tin oxide on LiMn₂O₄ electrodes[J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2021, 31(49): 2105180. DOI: 10.1002/adfm. 202105180.
22	YANG J X, LI C J, GUANG T J, et al. Zero lithium miscibility gap enables high-rate equimolar Li(Mn,Fe)PO₄ solid solution[J]. Nano Letters, 2021, 21(12): 5091-5097. DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00957.
23	ZHANG H, TANG Y H, SHEN J Q, et al. Antisite defects and Mg doping in LiFePO₄: A first-principles investigation[J]. Applied Physics A, 2011, 104(2): 529-537. DOI: 10.1007/s00339-011-6309-0.
24	WANG C, XING L D, VATAMANU J, et al. Overlooked electrolyte destabilization by manganese (Ⅱ) in lithium-ion batteries[J]. Nature Communications, 2019, 10(1): 3423. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-11439-8.

样品	a/nm	b/nm	c/nm	V/nm³
LMFP-BOL	0.47249	1.04053	0.60646	0.29816
LMFP-EOL	0.47221	1.04018	0.60621	0.29776

石墨负极参数	BOL极片(25 ℃)	EOL极片(25 ℃)
充电比容量/(mAh/g)	334.2	314.7
放电比容量/(mAh/g)	315.9	291.2

[1]	Xiaowei HUANG, Shaopeng LI, Xiaogang ZHANG. Research on the impact and mechanism of the lithium replenishment degree of anode prelithiation on the performance of lithium-ion batteries [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(9): 2727-2734.
[2]	Yingying HU, Jingyi WANG, Xiangwei WU, Jianguo WEN, Zhaoyin WEN. Analysis of long cycle performance and voltage relaxation curves of tubular ZEBRA batteries [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(9): 3021-3027.
[3]	Xiaomei LIU, Bin YAO, Leqiong XIE, Qiao HU, Li WANG, Xiangming HE. Analysis of the capacity fading mechanism in lithium iron phosphate power batteries cycled at ambient temperatures [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2021, 10(4): 1338-1343.
[4]	Fanfeng LIU, Cheng CHEN, Zhiyuan ZHU, Weikang ZHANG, Zhengzhong LYU. The influence of N/P ratio on the performance of lithium iron phosphate batteries [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2021, 10(4): 1325-1329.
[5]	ZHANG Xin, KONG Lingli, GAO Tengyue, LI Haitao, YAO Xiaohui, LI Fuxuan. Analysis and improvement of cycle performance for Ni-rich lithium ion battery [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2020, 9(3): 813-817.
[6]	XU Zhibin, WU Guoqiang, HUANG Weiguo, CHEN Li, ZHANG Xiong, ZHOU Zhixue, LIU Xiaowei. Optimization formula of lead-carbon negative electrode by orthogonal experimental design [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2019, 8(S1): 85-89.
[7]	WU Mingxia, YANG Chongyang, ZHANG Qinglin, CHEN Si, AN Zhongxun, ZHOU Yirong. Performance of ceramic composite separators in lithium nickel cobalt manganese oxide/graphite lithium-ion batteries [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2019, 8(4): 725-731.
[8]	REN Jing, HUANG Zhimei, SHEN Yue, HUANG Yunhui. Achieving high performance lithium-O₂ battery by introducing a novel urea electrolyte [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2018, 7(4): 667-673.
[9]	JIN Yi1, WANG Le1, YANG Cenyu1, SONG Jie1, XU Chao2. Cycle performance of a packed bed based cold storage device [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2017, 6(4): 708-718.

A study on dissolution of transition metal ions and influence on the cycling performance of LiMn_0.6Fe_0.4PO₄

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 24

Related Articles 9

Recommended Articles 0

Metrics

Comments

LMFP正极	循环周数	负极Mn沉积量/ppm	负极Fe沉积量/ppm
LMFP-1	BOL	4	13
	100周	44	16
	200周	60	18
	400周	84	18
	600周	91	53
	EOL	130	51
LMFP-2	BOL	7	15
	100周	35	17
	200周	54	19
	400周	87	25
	600周	106	55
	800周	118	28
	EOL	179	21

LFP正极	负极Fe沉积量/ppm
LFP正极	200周	500周	1000周	2000周
LFP-1	9	24	12	21
LFP-2	17	36	25	40
LFP-3	13	31	22	44