基于EMD分解的混合储能辅助火电机组一次调频容量规划

doi:10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2022.0588

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

高新能源渗透率的新型电力系统更容易发生发电侧与用户侧的负荷失衡，从而造成电网频率波动，这对电网安全带来了巨大的挑战。提升发电侧主动调频支撑成为解决这一问题的关键。储能技术辅助调频主力的火电机组参与发电侧一次调频不仅可以提升电网安全性，也能降低机组磨损，提升机组运行的经济性。现存一次调频储能容量配置方法比较单一。因此，本文提出了一种基于EMD分解的混合储能辅助火电机组一次调频容量规划方法。使用EMD对储能的目标功率进行处理，并将处理后的IMF分量进行重构，从而确定混合储能的功率与能量配额，以归一化成本为最优目标，完成储能系统规划，弥补了现存研究未充分考虑功率高低频响应导致的储能配置方案不合理，不能充分利用不同形式储能特性造成的储能投资成本高、储能系统收益低、调频效果不理想等缺点。并以宿迁660 MW机组为一次调频算例验证了本文方法的可行性与经济性。研究结果可以为参与一次调频的火电机组储能规划提供一定技术参考。

关键词: EMD, 混合储能, 容量规划

Abstract:

The new power grids with the high penetration of new energies are more prone to load imbalance between the generation side and the user side, resulting in fluctuations in the grid frequency, which brings great challenges to frequency safety. Improving the active frequency modulation support is an effective method for the generation side. The energy storage technology, which assists the thermal power units participating in the primary frequency regulation, can not only improve the safety of power grids, but can also reduce the wear of the units and for more economic unit operations. The existing configuration method of the primary frequency modulation energy storage capacity is relatively simple. Hence, a configuration method is proposed for the hybrid energy storage system to assist the thermal power frequency modulation, based on the empirical mode decomposition (EMD). By adopting the EMD, the hybrid energy storage system power obtained by the target power is processed, and the modal components obtained from the EMD decomposition are reconstructed to determine the energy storage power allocation. Moreover, the power and capacity planning is conducted, and the optimal optimization scheme of the hybrid energy storage system is determined by taking the whole life cycle cost of the hybrid energy storage as the optimization objective. Our proposed method makes up for the unreasonable energy storage configuration scheme without fully considering the high- and low-frequency response of power unit, the high investment cost of energy storage caused by the inability to fully utilize different forms of energy storage characteristics, the low income of energy storage system, and the unsatisfactory frequency modulation effect. Finally, the effectiveness and economic aspects of the above planning methods are verified using a specific example in Suqian. This study can provide some technical references for the planning of hybrid energy storage in the frequency modulation of thermal power units.

Key words: EMD, hybrid energy storage, capacity planning

中图分类号:

TM 712

宋杰, 耿林霄, 桑永福, 温荣斌, 孙鹏, 弓林娟. 基于EMD分解的混合储能辅助火电机组一次调频容量规划[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(2): 496-503.

Jie SONG, Linxiao GENG, Yongfu SANG, Rongbin WEN, Peng SUN, Linjuan GONG. Study on primary frequency modulation capacity planning of thermal power unit assisted by hybrid energy storage based on EMD decomposition[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(2): 496-503.

图/表 10

图 1

图2

图3

图4

表1

IMF重构方案表"

序号	$I M F 1$	$I M F 2$	$I M F 3$	$I M F 4$	$I M F 5$	$I M F 6$	$I M F 7$	$I M F 8$	$I M F 9$	$I M F 10$
1	H	L	L	L	L	L	L	L	L	L
2	H	H	L	L	L	L	L	L	L	L
3	H	H	H	L	L	L	L	L	L	L
4	H	H	H	H	L	L	L	L	L	L
5	H	H	H	H	H	L	L	L	L	L
6	H	H	H	H	H	H	L	L	L	L
7	H	H	H	H	H	H	H	L	L	L
8	H	H	H	H	H	H	H	H	L	L
9	H	H	H	H	H	H	H	H	H	L

表1

表2

不同重构方案下储能容量与功率"

方案	$P H$ /MW	$P M L$ /MW	$E H$ /(kWh)	$E M L$ /(kWh)
重构方案1	5.42	9.58	69.80	167.13
重构方案2	9.36	9.56	103.47	163.89
重构方案3	9.36	7.96	145.57	154.63
重构方案4	9.38	7.96	114.93	154.62
重构方案5	9.32	5.68	61.23	121.01
重构方案6	8.96	5.68	109.03	125.46
重构方案7	8.83	3.71	174.57	82.41
重构方案8	8.92	2.59	202.44	57.53
重构方案9	9.07	2.55	220.98	42.63
单一飞轮	15.43	0	269	0
单一蓄电池	0	17.36	0	273

表2

图5

表3

混合储能其他参数"

参数	飞轮储能	蓄电池储能
充放电效率	0.90	0.8
运行成本系数	0.01	0.1
维护成本系数	0	0.02
处置成本系数	0.04	0.08
循环寿命	$10 a ①$	530
功率成本/(元/MW)	100000	150000
容量成本/(元/kWh)	25000	15000

表3

表4

图6

参考文献 11

1	张智刚, 康重庆. 碳中和目标下构建新型电力系统的挑战与展望[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2022, 42(8): 2806-2819.
	ZHANG Z G, KANG C Q. Challenges and prospects for constructing the new-type power system towards a carbon neutrality future[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2022, 42(8): 2806-2819.
2	刘冰, 张静, 李岱昕, 等. 储能在发电侧调峰调频服务中的应用现状和前景分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2016, 5(6): 909-914.
	LIU B, ZHANG J, LI D X, et al. Energy storage for peak shaving and frequency regulation in the front of meter: Progress and prospect[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2016, 5(6): 909-914.
3	牛阳, 张峰, 张辉, 等. 提升火电机组AGC性能的混合储能优化控制与容量规划[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2016, 40(10): 38-45, 83.
	NIU Y, ZHANG F, ZHANG H, et al. Optimal control strategy and capacity planning of hybrid energy storage system for improving AGC performance of thermal power units[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2016, 40(10): 38-45, 83.
4	汤杰, 李欣然, 黄际元, 等. 以净效益最大为目标的储能电池参与二次调频的容量配置方法[J]. 电工技术学报, 2019, 34(5): 963-972.
	TANG J, LI X R, HUANG J Y, et al. Capacity allocation of BESS in secondary frequency regulation with the goal of maximum net benefit[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2019, 34(5): 963-972.
5	罗耀东, 田立军, 王垚, 等. 飞轮储能参与电网一次调频协调控制策略与容量优化配置[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2022, 46(9): 71-82.
	LUO Y D, TIAN L J, WANG Y, et al. Coordinated control strategy and optimal capacity configuration for flywheel energy storage participating in primary frequency regulation of power grid[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2022, 46(9): 71-82.
6	韩健民, 薛飞宇, 梁双印, 等. 模糊控制优化下的混合储能系统辅助燃煤机组调频仿真[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(7): 2188-2196.
	HAN J M, XUE F Y, LIANG S Y, et al. Hybrid energy storage system assisted frequency modulation simulation of the coal-fired unit under fuzzy control optimization[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(7): 2188-2196.
7	洪烽, 梁璐, 逄亚蕾,等. 基于自适应协同下垂的飞轮储能联合火电机组一次调频控制策略[J].热力发电, 2023(1): 36-44.
	HONG F, LIANG L, PANG Y L, et al. Primary frequency regulation of flywheel energy storage combined thermal power unit based on adaptive coordinated droop control[J]. 热力发电, 2023(1): 36-44.
8	韩晓娟, 田春光, 程成, 等. 基于经验模态分解的混合储能系统功率分配方法[J]. 太阳能学报, 2014, 35(10): 1889-1896.
	HAN X J, TIAN C G, CHENG C, et al. Power allocation method of hybrid energy storage system based on empirical mode decomposition[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2014, 35(10): 1889-1896.
9	何林轩, 李文艳. 飞轮储能辅助火电机组一次调频过程仿真分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(5): 1679-1686.
	HE L X, LI W Y. Simulation of the primary frequency modulation process of thermal power units with the auxiliary of flywheel energy storage[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2021, 10(5): 1679-1686.
10	隋云任, 梁双印, 黄登超, 等. 飞轮储能辅助燃煤机组调频动态过程仿真研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2020, 40(8): 2597-2606.
	SUI Y R, LIANG S Y, HUANG D C, et al. Simulation study on frequency modulation process of coal burning plants with auxiliary of flywheel energy storage[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2020, 40(8): 2597-2606.
11	韩中合, 张策, 高明非. 基于EMD分解的孤岛型综合能源系统混合储能规划[J]. 热力发电, 2022, 51(9): 72-78.
	HAN Z H, ZHANG C, GAO M F. Research on hybrid energy storage planning of isolated integrated energy system based on EMD decomposition[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2022, 51(9): 72-78.

[1]	武鑫, 尚文举, 马志勇, 滕伟, 张爽, 罗海荣. 抽水蓄能-飞轮混合储能系统协调控制方法[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(2): 468-476.
[2]	韩健民, 薛飞宇, 梁双印, 乔天舒. 模糊控制优化下的混合储能系统辅助燃煤机组调频仿真[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(7): 2188-2196.
[3]	郭斌, 邢洁, 姚飞, 景小敏. 基于双层规划模型的用户侧混合储能优化配置[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(2): 615-622.
[4]	秦昊, 秦立军, 白雪辰, 李聪. 辅助抽水蓄能调频的飞轮控制策略[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(12): 3915-3925.
[5]	杨文强, 常彬. 计及多影响因素的发电侧混合储能系统容量配置方法及配置工具[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(10): 3246-3256.
[6]	乔亮波, 张晓虎, 孙现众, 张熊, 马衍伟. 电池-超级电容器混合储能系统研究进展[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(1): 98-106.
[7]	高晓芝, 王磊, 田晋, 刘佳璐, 刘庆华. 基于参数优化变分模态分解的混合储能功率分配策略[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(1): 147-155.
[8]	夏阳, 金光, 张立, 刘智慧, 郭少朋. 基于建筑能源系统的混合储能技术研究现状[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(6): 2169-2180.
[9]	张骞, 武小兰, 白志峰, 程靖宜. 电动汽车混合储能系统自适应能量管理策略研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2020, 9(3): 878-884.
[10]	缪平, 姚祯, 刘庆华, 王保国. 电池储能技术研究进展及展望[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2020, 9(3): 670-678.
[11]	张梦田, 田书, 曾志辉. 基于变分模态分解的混合储能容量优化配置[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2020, 9(1): 170-177.
[12]	章宝歌, 李萍, 张振, 王宇, 荣耀. 应用于城轨列车混合储能系统的能量管理策略[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2020, 9(1): 204-210.
[13]	李瑞民, 张新敬, 徐玉杰, 孙雯雯, 周学志, 郭丛, 陈海生. 风光互补系统中混合储能容量优化配置研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2019, 8(3): 512-522.
[14]	牛萌, 刘海军, 林培峰, 梁适春. 一种混合储能光伏并网系统设计[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2013, 2(3): 312-315.