释能过程沸石填充式热化学反应器热性能参数敏感性分析

doi:10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2025.0106

储能科学与技术 ›› 2025, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (9): 3330-3339.doi: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2025.0106

• 储能材料与器件 • 上一篇

释能过程沸石填充式热化学反应器热性能参数敏感性分析

李莹¹(), 刘淑丽¹(), 邹煜良², 王义函¹, 陈廷森¹, 沈永亮³

^1.北京理工大学机械与车辆学院，北京 100081
^2.北京航空航天大学总务部，北京 100191
^3.北京理工大学材料学院，北京 100081

收稿日期:2025-02-06 修回日期:2025-03-08 出版日期:2025-09-28 发布日期:2025-09-05
通讯作者: 刘淑丽 E-mail:15733578085@163.com;shuli79@126.com
作者简介:李莹（1999—），女，硕士研究生，研究方向为热化学储能，E-mail： 15733578085@163.com；
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(52178063);国家自然科学基金项目(52406066);国家资助博士后研究人员计划项目(GZC20233388)

Sensitivity analysis of thermal performance parameters of zeolite-filled thermochemical reactor during energy release

Ying LI¹(), Shuli LIU¹(), Yuliang ZOU², Yihan WANG¹, Tingsen CHEN¹, Yongliang SHEN³

^1.School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
^2.General Affairs Department, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
^3.School of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

Received:2025-02-06 Revised:2025-03-08 Online:2025-09-28 Published:2025-09-05
Contact: Shuli LIU E-mail:15733578085@163.com;shuli79@126.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

热能储存技术对于可再生能源的开发和利用至关重要。热化学储能技术与传统储能技术相比，具有稳定、可跨季节储存等优点，可以有效解决太阳能利用中出现的时间和空间上供需不匹配的问题。吸附式热化学储能是目前极具发展前景的热能储存技术。在中低温热化学储能领域，沸石13 X是一种廉价且安全的材料。常规填充式反应床是一种简单可靠的反应器，本研究通过Fluent建立数值模型，对反应器的输出性能进行数值模拟，研究了入口湿空气温度、入口湿空气流量、入口湿空气湿度、沸石初始吸附量等因素对反应器的输出性能的影响，分析了反应器内的传质过程，确定了反应器的输出性能对各参数变化的敏感程度，旨在为热化学反应器的参数设计提供理论指导。研究发现，反应器输出热功率对沸石初始吸附量的变化最为敏感，对入口湿空气流量的变化不太敏感。提高入口湿空气流量可降低反应器的输出温度，而提高入口湿空气温度和降低沸石初始吸附量可显著提升反应器的输出温度，反应器的输出温度最高可达90 ℃。

关键词: 热化学储能, 放热过程, 参数分析

Abstract:

Thermal energy storage technology is crucial for the development and utilization of renewable energy. Compared with traditional energy storage methods, thermochemical energy storage offers advantages such as stability and cross-seasonal storage, effectively addressing the mismatch between energy supply and demand in both time and space for solar energy utilization. Among various thermal energy storage technologies, adsorption-type thermochemical energy storage shows significant potential for development. In the field of medium- and low-temperature thermochemical energy storage, zeolite 13X is an economical and safe material. The conventional packed-bed reactor is a simple and reliable structure. In this study, a numerical model was established using Fluent to simulate the output performance of a zeolite-filled thermochemical reactor. The effects of inlet wet air temperature, inlet wet air flow rate, inlet wet air humidity, and initial zeolite adsorption capacity on reactor performance were investigated. The mass transfer process inside the reactor, variations in zeolite adsorption, and changes in reactor output power were analyzed. The sensitivity of reactor output performance to different parameters was identified, providing theoretical guidance for reactor design. The results indicate that the reactor output thermal power is most sensitive to changes in the initial adsorption capacity of zeolite. When the initial adsorption capacity decreases from 0.19 kg/kg to 0.15 kg/kg, the reactor output power increases by 49%. Conversely, it is least sensitive to variations in the inlet wet air flow rate; increasing the flow rate from 80 kg/h to 160 kg/h results in only a 20% increase in thermal power. Increasing the inlet wet air flow rate reduces the reactor outlet temperature, while increasing the inlet wet air temperature and reducing the initial zeolite adsorption capacity can significantly enhance the outlet temperature, which can reach up to 90 ℃.

Key words: thermochemical energy storage, discharge process, parameter optimization

中图分类号:

TK 02

李莹, 刘淑丽, 邹煜良, 王义函, 陈廷森, 沈永亮. 释能过程沸石填充式热化学反应器热性能参数敏感性分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2025, 14(9): 3330-3339.

Ying LI, Shuli LIU, Yuliang ZOU, Yihan WANG, Tingsen CHEN, Yongliang SHEN. Sensitivity analysis of thermal performance parameters of zeolite-filled thermochemical reactor during energy release[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2025, 14(9): 3330-3339.

图/表 9

图1

表1

数值模拟参数设置"

参数	符号	取值	单位
沸石导热系数	$λ b$	0.20	$W / m ∙ ℃$
沸石密度	$ρ s$	850	$k g / m 3$
沸石比热容	$c p s$	900	$J / k g ∙ ℃$
干空气密度	$ρ d$	1.177	$k g / m 3$
干空气摩尔质量	$M d$	0.0289	kg/mol
干空气比热容	$c p d$	1004.9	$J / k g ∙ ℃$
干空气热导率	$K d$	0.0263	$W / m ∙ ℃$
水蒸气比热容	$c p w$	1864	$J / k g ∙ ℃$
水蒸气热导率	$K w$	0.0196	$W / m ∙ ℃$
水蒸气摩尔质量	$M w$	0.018	kg/mol
最大吸附容积	$X m$	0.33	kg/kg
孔隙率	$ε$	0.4	—
粒径	d_p	3	mm
特征能量	$E 1$	1192300	$J / k g$
反应器宽	$L 1$	0.5	$m$
反应器长	$L 2$	0.8	$m$
水蒸气气体特征常数	$R w$	461.5	$J / k g ∙ ℃$
理想气体常数	$R$	8.314	$J / ℃ ∙ m o l$
基准扩散率	$D s 0$	0.02 $e - 4$	$m 2 / s$
活化能	$E 2$	29500	$J / m o l$

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

参考文献 28

[1]	FARGHALI M, OSMAN A I, MOHAMED I M A, et al. Strategies to save energy in the context of the energy crisis: A review[J]. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 2023, 21(4): 2003-2039. DOI: 10.1007/s10311-023-01591-5.
[2]	YOUSEF M S, HASSAN H. Assessment of different passive solar stills via exergoeconomic, exergoenvironmental, and exergoenviroeconomic approaches: A comparative study[J]. Solar Energy, 2019, 182: 316-331. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.02.042.
[3]	SAID M A, HASSAN H. Effect of using nanoparticles on the performance of thermal energy storage of phase change material coupled with air-conditioning unit[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 171: 903-916. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman. 2018.06.051.
[4]	AYDIN D, CASEY S P, RIFFAT S. The latest advancements on thermochemical heat storage systems[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 41: 356-367. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.054.
[5]	DAVIS S J, LEWIS N S, SHANER M, et al. Net-zero emissions energy systems[J]. Science, 2018, 360(6396): eaas9793. DOI: 10.1126/science.aas9793.
[6]	CABEZA L F, SOLÉ A, BARRENECHE C. Review on sorption materials and technologies for heat pumps and thermal energy storage[J]. Renewable Energy, 2017, 110: 3-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.09.059.
[7]	MA Z W, BAO H S, ROSKILLY A P. Electricity-assisted thermochemical sorption system for seasonal solar energy storage[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020, 209: 112659. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112659.
[8]	JOHANNES K, KUZNIK F, HUBERT J L, et al. Design and characterisation of a high powered energy dense zeolite thermal energy storage system for buildings[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 159: 80-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.109.
[9]	GAO S C, WANG S G, HU P Y, et al. Performance of sorption thermal energy storage in zeolite bed reactors: Analytical solution and experiment[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2023, 64: 107154. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2023.107154.
[10]	SCAPINO L, ZONDAG H A, VAN BAEL J, et al. Energy density and storage capacity cost comparison of conceptual solid and liquid sorption seasonal heat storage systems for low-temperature space heating[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 76: 1314-1331. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser. 2017.03.101.
[11]	HAO C S, FENG G S, MA C J, et al. Performance analysis of a novel multi-module columnar packed bed reactor with salt hydrates for thermochemical heat storage[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2024, 86: 111170. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2024.111170.
[12]	AYDIN D, CASEY S P, CHEN X J, et al. Novel "open-sorption pipe" reactor for solar thermal energy storage[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 121: 321-334. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.05.045.
[13]	MITALI J, DHINAKARAN S, MOHAMAD A A. Energy storage systems: A review[J]. Energy Storage and Saving, 2022, 1(3): 166-216. DOI: 10.1016/j.enss.2022.07.002.
[14]	RANJHA Q, VAHEDI N, OZTEKIN A. High-temperature thermochemical energy storage-heat transfer enhancements within reaction bed[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 163: 114407. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114407.
[15]	SCIACOVELLI A, GAGLIARDI F, VERDA V. Maximization of performance of a PCM latent heat storage system with innovative fins[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 137: 707-715. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.015.
[16]	ZHANG C B, LI J, CHEN Y P. Improving the energy discharging performance of a latent heat storage (LHS) unit using fractal-tree-shaped fins[J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 259: 114102. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114102.
[17]	FOPAH-LELE A, ROHDE C, NEUMANN K, et al. Lab-scale experiment of a closed thermochemical heat storage system including honeycomb heat exchanger[J]. Energy, 2016, 114: 225-238. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.009.
[18]	WANG W, SHUAI Y, YANG J Y, et al. Heat transfer and heat storage characteristics of calcium hydroxide/oxide based on shell-tube thermochemical energy storage device[J]. Renewable Energy, 2023, 218: 119364. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.119364.
[19]	LI W, GUO H, ZENG M, et al. Performance of SrBr₂·6H₂O based seasonal thermochemical heat storage in a novel multilayered sieve reactor[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 198: 111843. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111843.
[20]	HAN X C, XU H J, XU T, et al. Magnesium-based thermochemical reactor with multiporous structures for medium-temperature solar applications: Transient modelling of discharge capability[J]. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2022, 238: 111630. DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2022.111630.
[21]	HAN X C, XU H J, ZHAO C Y. Design and performance evaluation of multi-layered reactor for calcium-based thermochemical heat storage with multi-physics coupling[J]. Renewable Energy, 2022, 195: 1324-1340. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.120.
[22]	LUO X Y, LI W, WANG Q W, et al. Numerical investigation of a thermal energy storage system based on the serpentine tube reactor[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2022, 56: 106071. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2022.106071.
[23]	CHEN W, LI W, ZHANG Y S. Analysis of thermal deposition of MgCl₂·6H₂O hydrated salt in the sieve-plate reactor for heat storage[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 135: 95-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.02.043.
[24]	孙霄龙, 龚海艇, 陈臻, 等. 钙基热化学储热反应器传热传质协同强化及储热特性研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2025, 14(3): 1198-1209. DOI: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2025.0048.
	SUN X L, GONG H T, CHEN Z, et al. Synergistic enhancement of heat and mass transfer and heat storage characteristics in calcium-based thermochemical heat storage reactors[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2025, 14(3): 1198-1209. DOI: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2025.0048.
[25]	KANT K, SHUKLA A, SMEULDERS D M J, et al. Performance analysis of a K₂CO₃-based thermochemical energy storage system using a honeycomb structured heat exchanger[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2021, 38: 102563. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2021. 102563.
[26]	RANJHA Q, OZTEKIN A. Numerical analyses of three-dimensional fixed reaction bed for thermochemical energy storage[J]. Renewable Energy, 2017, 111: 825-835. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.062.
[27]	RUI J J, LUO Y M, WANG M Q, et al. Design and performance evaluation of an innovative salt hydrates-based reactor for thermochemical energy storage[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2022, 55: 105799. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2022.105799.
[28]	马鸿坤, 纪明希, 丁玉龙. 中低温吸附式热化学储热研究现状与进展[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(12): 4436-4451. DOI: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2024.0909.
	MA H K, JI M X, DING Y L. Current status and advances in the low-to-medium temperature sorption-based thermochemical heat storage[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2024, 13(12): 4436-4451. DOI: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2024.0909.

释能过程沸石填充式热化学反应器热性能参数敏感性分析

Sensitivity analysis of thermal performance parameters of zeolite-filled thermochemical reactor during energy release

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 28

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李承晨, 余庆华, 代慧涛, 贾娜, 王琳, 孙彬博. 基于SrBr₂·6H₂O的封闭式热化学反应器储/放能特性模拟研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2025, 14(9): 3319-3329.
[2]	莫子鸣, 饶宗昕, 杨建飞, 杨孟昊, 蔡黎明. 锂离子电池过充热失控气热模型构建及关键参数影响分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2025, 14(5): 1784-1796.
[3]	王梦茹, 孙希瑞, 张浩煜, 陈健, 李友势. 支撑体改性对钙铜复合材料热化学储能特性的影响[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(12): 4290-4298.
[4]	丁扬, 王翰文, 陆文杰, 罗元俊, 凌祥. 基于热泵储电的绝热钙循环卡诺电池系统特性及优化研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(12): 4247-4258.
[5]	徐书彧, 王燕. 基于MgSO₄ 的热化学储能特性数值研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(12): 4299-4309.
[6]	张志浩, 靳晓刚, 包恒兴, 凌祥. 混合加热反应器内Ca（OH）₂/CaO热化学储能体系实验[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(1): 227-235.
[7]	董远夏, 张恒运, 朱佳俊, 徐晓斌, 朱顺良. 车用电池模组热蔓延防护结构的数值仿真研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(5): 1608-1616.
[8]	沈丹, 赵长颖. 镁/氢化镁储热系统放热过程优化分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2014, 3(1): 36-41.