Effect of magnetic field on the lithium-ion battery performance

doi:10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2021.0343

Abstract

Abstract:

The electric vehicle industry is rapidly developing, and the performance of lithium-ion batteries is very important to the growing range of electric vehicles. A magnetic field is generated by the change of the moving charge or the electric field. When an external magnetic field is applied to a substance, the inside of that substance is magnetized, and many tiny magnetic dipoles appear. In this study, an experimental method is proposed to test the performance of lithium-ion batteries under the effect of a magnetic field and deeply analyze the influence of this magnetic field on the battery performance. The experiment platform included lithium-ion batteries, a battery charge and discharge test system, and a magnetic field generating system. Comparative experiments were performed on Panasonic 18650 lithium-ion batteries to study their charge and discharge performances and internal resistance. The experimental results show that lithium-ion batteries have good environmental adaptability and charge-discharge performance under the magnetic field effect. When different magnetic field effects were loaded, the charge and discharge capacities of the lithium-ion batteries changed and increased with the enhancement of the magnetic induction intensity. In the discharge process, the greater the magnetic induction intensity, the smaller the batteries' ohmic internal resistance and polarization internal resistance. The results prove that the problem of the short range of the current lithium-ion batteries can effectively be solved.

Key words: magnetic field effect, lithium-ion battery, performance

CLC Number:

TM 912

Guanqiang RUAN, Jing HUA, Xing HU, Changqing YU. Effect of magnetic field on the lithium-ion battery performance[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(1): 265-274.

Figures/Tables 17

Fig. 1

Table 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Table 2

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Table 3

Fig. 11

Table 4

Fig. 12

Fig. 13

References 20

1	ANDREWS D J, POLMATEER T L, WHEELER J P, et al. Enterprise risk and resilience of electric-vehicle charging infrastructure and the future mobile power grid[J]. Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports, 2020, 7(1): 9-15.
2	DAS S, SATPATHY M P, ROUTARA B C, et al. Microstructural and joint analysis of ultrasonic welded aluminum to cupro-nickel sheets for lithium-ion battery packs[J]. Materials Science Forum, 2020, 978: 463-469.
3	谢建江, 高翔, 夏晨强, 等. 锂电池储能舱运行状态信息采集系统研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(3): 1109-1116.
	XIE J J , GAO X , XIA C Q , et al. Research on information acquisition system of lithium battery energy storage cabin[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2021, 10(3): 1109-1116.
4	左安昊, 方儒卿, 李哲. 锂离子电池电极结构参数对单体能量与功率的影响[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(2): 470-482.
	ZUO A H, FANG R Q, LI Z. Impact of electrode structure parameters on energy and power for lithium-ion cells[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2021, 10(2): 470-482.
5	LU Z, YU X L, ZHANG L Y, et al. Experimental investigation on the charge-discharge performance of the commercial lithium-ion batteries[J]. Energy Procedia, 2017, 143: 21-26.
6	CHENG H M, WANG F M, CHU J P. Effect of Lorentz force on the electrochemical performance of lithium-ion batteries[J]. Electrochemistry Communications, 2017, 76: 63-66.
7	SINGH P, KHARE N, CHATURVEDI P K. Li-ion battery ageing model parameter: SEI layer analysis using magnetic field probing[J]. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 2018, 21(1): 35-42.
8	DUNCA S, CREANGA D E, AILIESEI O, et al. Microorganisms growth with magnetic fluids[J]. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2005, 289: 445-447.
9	OKUNO K, FUJINAMI R, ANO T, et al. Disappearance of growth advantage in stationary phase (GASP) phenomenon under a high magnetic field[J]. Bioelectrochemistry, 2001, 53(2): 165-169.
10	SHEN, K, WANG Z, BI X X, et al. Magnetic field-suppressed lithium dendrite growth for stable lithium-metal batteries[J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2019, 9(20): 1900260.1-1900260.8.
11	BILLAUD J, BOUVILLE F, MAGRINI T, et al. Magnetically aligned graphite electrodes for high-rate performance Li-ion batteries[J]. Nature Energy, 2016, 1: doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.97.
12	ROWDEN B, GARCIA-ARAEZ N. A review of gas evolution in lithium ion batteries[J]. Energy Reports, 2020, 6: 10-18.
13	BLÄUBAUM L, RÖSE P, SCHMIDT L, et al. The effects of gas saturation of electrolytes on the performance and durability of lithium-ion batteries[J]. ChemSusChem, 2021, 14(14): 2943-2951.
14	LI Y K, WEI C, SHENG Y M, et al. Swelling force in lithium-ion power batteries[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2020, 59(27): 12313-12318.
15	CHEN J Q, WANG D, WANG Y, et al. An improved 3-D magnetic field generator with larger uniform region[J]. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, 2016, 26(7): 1-5.
16	NISMAYANTI A, JANNAH H, RUGAYYA S, et al. Helmholtz coils model as pulsed electromagnetic field therapy devices for fracture healing using comsol multiphysics[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, 1763(1): doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1763/1/012060.
17	陈学文, 谢腾辉, 张家伟, 等. 亥姆霍兹线圈磁场的理论计算与实验讨论[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 45(3): 40-45.
	CHEN X W, XIE T H, ZHANG J W, et al. On theoretical calculation and experimental discussion of magnetic field due to Helmholtz coil[J]. Journal of Southwest China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 45(3): 40-45.
18	LOU T T, ZHANG W G, GUO H Y, et al. The internal resistance characteristics of lithium-ion battery based on HPPC method[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 455/456: 246-251.
19	YUAN ZOU J F, ZHANG X D. Quantifying electric vehicle battery's ohmic resistance increase caused by degradation from on-board data[J]. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2019, 52(5): 297-302.
20	QIU C S, HE G, SHI W K, et al. The polarization characteristics of lithium-ion batteries under cyclic charge and discharge[J]. Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, 2019, 23(6): 1887-1902.

参数	数值
产品尺寸	18 mm×65 mm
充电工作环境	0～50 ℃
放电工作环境	-20～60 ℃
额定容量	3.0 A·h
额定电压	3.6 V
充电截止电压	(4.2±0.03)V
放电截止电压	2.75 V
最大持续放电电流	4.87 A

磁感应强度/mT	平台电压/V
0	3.11～3.80
3.95	3.12～3.81
19.75	3.21～3.84
39.50	3.32～3.88

循环次数	容量类型	不同磁感应强度下的容量/(A·h)
循环次数	容量类型	0	3.95 mT	19.75 mT	39.50 mT
第三次	放电容量	2.46	2.51	2.66	2.87
第三次	充电容量	2.46	2.52	2.67	2.88
第四次	放电容量	2.45	2.50	2.65	2.89
第四次	充电容量	2.46	2.50	2.68	2.88
第五次	放电容量	2.46	2.52	2.67	2.89
第五次	充电容量	2.46	2.50	2.67	2.87

循环次数	能量类型	不同磁感应强度下的电池能量/(W·h)
循环次数	能量类型	0	3.95 mT	19.75 mT	39.50 mT
第三次	放电能量	8.65	8.85	9.40	10.28
第三次	充电能量	9.32	9.55	10.02	10.79
第四次	放电能量	8.67	8.88	9.42	10.30
第四次	充电能量	9.30	9.51	10.00	10.76
第五次	放电能量	8.64	8.83	9.39	10.26
第五次	充电能量	9.30	9.52	10.01	10.77

[1]	Haitao LI, Lingli KONG, Xin ZHANG, Chuanjun YU, Jiwei WANG, Lin XU. The effects of N/P design on the performances of Ni-rich NCM/Gr lithium ion battery [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(7): 2040-2045.
[2]	Shunmin YI, Linbo XIE, Li PENG. Remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on VF-DW-DFN [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(7): 2305-2315.
[3]	Qingwei ZHU, Xiaoli YU, Qichao WU, Yidan XU, Fenfang CHEN, Rui HUANG. Semi-empirical degradation model of lithium-ion battery with high energy density [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(7): 2324-2331.
[4]	Xiongwen XU, Yang NIE, Jian TU, Zheng XU, Jian XIE, Xinbing ZHAO. Abuse performance of pouch-type Na-ion batteries based on Prussian blue cathode [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(7): 2030-2039.
[5]	Yuzuo WANG, Jin WANG, Yinli LU, Dianbo RUAN. Study on the effects of pore structure on lithium-storage performances for soft carbon [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(7): 2023-2029.
[6]	Wei KONG, Jingtao JIN, Xipo LU, Yang SUN. Study on cooling performance of lithium ion batteries with symmetrical serpentine channel [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(7): 2258-2265.
[7]	ZHAO Yifei, YANG Zhendong, LI Feng, XIE Zhaojun, ZHOU Zhen. Nitrogen-doped carbon-coated Na₃V₂ （PO₄ ） ₂F₃cathode materials for sodium-ion batteries： Preparation and electrochemical performance [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(6): 1883-1891.
[8]	YAN Qiaoyi, WU Feng, CHEN Renjie, LI Li. Recovery and resource recycling of graphite anode materials for spent lithium-ion batteries [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(6): 1760-1771.
[9]	YU Chunhui, HE Ziying, ZHANG Chenxi, LIN Xianqing, XIAO Zhexi, WEI Fei. The analyses and suppressing strategies of silicon anode with the electrolyte [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(6): 1749-1759.
[10]	WU Xiaoling, ZHOU Tao, LIU Yuzhao, DU Yanping, CHEN Huiping, LI Shun. Numerical study on cooling enhancement of micro devices by designing turbulence based hollow micro pin-fin arrays with lateral holes [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(6): 1980-1987.
[11]	WANG Can, MA Pan, ZHU Guoliang, WEI Shuimiao, YANG Zhilu, ZHANG Zhiyu. Effect of lithium acrylic-coated nature graphite on its electrochemical properties [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(6): 1706-1714.
[12]	LIU Hangxin, CHEN Xiantao, SUN Qiang, ZHAO Chenxi. Cycle performance characteristics of soft pack lithium-ion batteries under vacuum environment [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(6): 1806-1815.
[13]	WANG Yuzuo, DENG Miao, WANG Jin, YANG Bin, LU Yinli, JIN Ge, RUAN Dianbo. Study on the effects of carbonization temperature on lithium-storage kinetics for soft carbon [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(6): 1715-1724.
[14]	Yanwen DAI, Aiqing YU. Combined CNN-LSTM and GRU based health feature parameters for lithium-ion batteries SOH estimation [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(5): 1641-1649.
[15]	Chunjing LIN, Danhua LI, Haoran WEN, Tianyi MA, Hong CHANG, Peixiang CHANG, Haiqiang LI, Shiqiang LIU. Research on swelling force characteristics of power battery during charging [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(5): 1627-1633.