CAES储气库设计参数对其热力学特性影响

doi:10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2020.0256

储能科学与技术 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1): 370-378.doi: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2020.0256

CAES储气库设计参数对其热力学特性影响

万发¹(), 蒋中明^1,²(), 唐栋^1,³

^1.长沙理工大学水利工程学院
^2.长沙理工大学水沙科学与水灾害防治湖南省重点实验室
^3.长沙理工大学洞庭湖水环境治理与生态修复湖南省重点实验室，湖南长沙 410114

收稿日期:2020-08-05 修回日期:2020-09-15 出版日期:2021-01-05 发布日期:2021-01-08
通讯作者: 蒋中明 E-mail:wfwanfa123@163.com;zzmmjiang@163.com
作者简介:万发（1991—），男，博士研究生，主要从事压气储能技术相关研究，E-mail：wfwanfa123@163.com；
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(51778070);湖南省研究生科研创新项目(CX20190662)

The influence of CAES reservoir design parameters on thermodynamic properties

Fa WAN¹(), Zhongming JIANG^1,²(), Dong TANG^1,³

^1.School of Hydraulic Engineering, Changsha University of Science & Technology
^2.Key Laboratory of Water-Sediment Sciences and Water Disaster Prevention of Hunan Province
^3.Key Laboratory of Dongting Lake Aquatic Eco-Environmental Control and Restoration of Hunan Province, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha 410114, Hu'nan, China

Received:2020-08-05 Revised:2020-09-15 Online:2021-01-05 Published:2021-01-08
Contact: Zhongming JIANG E-mail:wfwanfa123@163.com;zzmmjiang@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为研究压缩空气储能(CAES)电站储气库热力学特性分布规律，并探究圆柱形洞室不同形体参数K(长度半径比值)以及入气口位置对储气洞室内热力学特性和能量存储的影响，本工作采用非等温共轭传热模型建立了CAES洞室三维模型，计算了不同形体参数K和不同入气口布置方式下充气段洞室内热力学过程。结果表明：CAES洞室内温度场存在显著不均匀性，但是压力分布差异性不大；圆柱形洞室体型参数K会显著影响洞室温度场，但对压力分布和存储?影响不大，K值越大，温度均值和极大值越大；入气口设在中部可显著降低温度均值和极大值，分别降低16 K和159.61 K，但不会影响存储?。因此，压气储能储气库内温度场存在不均匀性，不均匀温度场可在局部形成极高温，对衬砌和围岩的安全性产生重大威胁，采用中部入气并设计合理形体参数可在不影响能量存储的条件下有效改善温度场不均匀性，从而避免由不均匀温度产生围岩热应力破坏。

关键词: 压缩空气储能, 热力学特性, 储气库洞室, 设计参数, 存储?

Abstract:

The thermodynamic properties of compressed air energy storage (CAES) have been reported in recent years, including the mean gas pressure and temperature in a gas reservoir and the influence on the security of the surrounding rock, but the temperature and pressure distribution in the cavity have not been reported. To study the thermodynamic properties of a CAES gas storage cavern, the effects of different shape parameters K (ratio of length and radius), and the inlet position on the internal thermodynamic properties of the cylindrical cavity, a non-isothermal conjugate heat transfer model was used to build a 3D model of a CAES gas storage cavern. The thermodynamic process of the charging stage was calculated under different values of K and with varied air inlet layouts. The results of the study indicated that: ① the temperature field in the CAES hole was heterogeneous, but the pressure field was uniformly distributed; ② a cylindrical cavity shape had a significant influence on the temperature field of the cavity, but little influence on the pressure distribution and exergy storage. In other words, the bigger the K value, the bigger the mean temperature and the maximum; ③ placing the air inlet in the center of the cavity significantly reduced the mean and maximum temperatures by 16 K and 159.61 K, respectively, but did not affect the exergy storage; ④ there was inhomogeneity in the temperature field of the CAES air storage cavern, where extremely high temperatures could form locally, which seriously threatens the safety of the lining and surrounding rock. The inhomogeneity of the temperature field can be improved by placing the air inlet in the center and designing reasonable shape parameters to avoid the thermal stress damage of surrounding rock caused by the temperature inhomogeneity.

Key words: compressed air energy storage, thermodynamic characteristics, gas storage caverns, design parameters, exergy storage

中图分类号:

TK 82

万发, 蒋中明, 唐栋. CAES储气库设计参数对其热力学特性影响[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(1): 370-378.

Fa WAN, Zhongming JIANG, Dong TANG. The influence of CAES reservoir design parameters on thermodynamic properties[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2021, 10(1): 370-378.

图/表 19

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表2

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

图13

图14

图15

图16

图17

参考文献 16

1	潘聪, 王春明, 刘松, 等. 分布式电网中混合储能系统的接入型式探讨[J]. 船电技术, 2014, 34(6): 46-49.
	PAN C, WANG C M, LIU S, et al. Reviews on the structure of hybrid energy storage system ligated into distributed grid[J]. Marine Electric & Electronic Engineering, 2014, 34(6): 46-49.
2	杨江涛, 孙春顺, 杨安, 等. 峰谷电价下配电网中分布式储能的容量配置[J]. 电力科学与工程, 2016, 32(11): 12-17.
	YANG J T, SUN C S, YANG A, et al. Capacity configuration of distribution energy storage in distribution network under the peak-valley[J]. Electric Power Science and Engineering, 2016, (11): 12-17.
3	余耀, 孙华, 许俊斌, 等. 压缩空气储能技术综述[J]. 装备机械, 2013(1): 68-74.
	YU Y, SUN H, XU J B, et al. Overview of compressed air energy storage technology[J]. Equipment Machinery, 2013(1): 68-74.
4	XING L, WANG J, DOONER M, et al. Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 137: 511-536.
5	CHEN L J, ZHENG T W, MEI S W, et al. Review and prospect of compressed air energy storage system[J]. J Mod Power Syst Clean Energy, 2016, 4(4): 529-541.
6	高建强, 庄绪增, 敬赛. CAES电站储气室热力学特性的数值模拟研究[J]. 电力科学与工程, 2018, 34(12): 71-76.
	GAO J Q, ZHUANG X Z, JIN S. Numerical simulation study on thermodynamic characteristics of gas storage chamber of CAES power station[J]. Electric Power Science and Engineering, 2018, 34(12): 71-76.
7	RAJU M, KHAITAN S K. Modeling and simulation of compressed air storage in caverns: A case study of the Huntorf plant[J]. Applied Energy, 2012, 89(1): 474-481.
8	KUSHNIRN, DAYANA, ULLMANNA. Temperature and pressure variations within compressed air energy storage caverns[J]. International Journal of Heat & Mass Transfer, 2012, 55(21/22): 5616-5630.
9	ZHOU S W, XIA C C, DU S G, et al. An analytical solution for mechanical responses induced by temperature and air pressure in a lined rock cavern for underground compressed air energy storage[J]. Rock Mechanics & Rock Engineering, 2015, 48(2): 749-770.
10	XIA C, ZHOU Y, ZHOU S, et al. A simplified and unified analytical solution for temperature and pressure variations in compressed air energy storage caverns[J]. Renewable Energy, 2015, 74: 718-726.
11	QUAST P, CROTOGINO F. Initial experience with the compressed-air energy storage (CAES) project of Nordwest deutsche Kraftwerke AG (NWK) at Huntorf/West Germany[J]. Erdoel Erdgas Zeitschrift, 1979, 95: 310-314.
12	GEISSBÜHLER L, BECATTINI V, ZANGANEH G , et al. Pilot-scale demonstration of advanced adiabatic compressed air energy storage, Part 1: Plant description and tests with sensible thermal-energy storage[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2018, 17: 129-139.
13	蒋中明, 刘澧源, 李双龙, 等. 压气储能平江试验库受力特性数值研究[J]. 长沙理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 14(4): 62-68.
	JIANG Z M, LIU L Y, LI S L, et al. Numerical study on mechanical characteristics of the Pingjiang pilot cavern for compressed air energy storage[J]. Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology (Natural Science), 2017, 14(4): 62-68.
14	刘佳. 超临界空气蓄热蓄冷数值与实验研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学(中国科学院工程热物理研究所), 2012.
	LIU J. Numerical and experimental study heat and cold energy storage using supercritical air[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Science(Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences), 2012.
15	HE W , LUO X , EVANS D , et al. Exergy storage of compressed air in cavern and cavern volume estimation of the large-scale compressed air energy storage system[J]. Applied Energy, 2017, 208: 745-757.
16	夏才初, 张平阳, 周舒威, 等. 大规模压气储能洞室稳定性和洞周应变分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2014, 35(5): 1391-1398.
	XIA C C, ZHANG P Y, ZHOU S W, et al. Stability and tangential strain analysis of large-scale compressed air energy storage cavern[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2014, 35(5): 1391-1398.

参数	数值
储气室半径r/m	17.24
洞室体积V/m3	141000
洞室高度h/m	150
入气口半径r₁/m	0.265
围岩密度ρ/kg·m^-3	2100
围岩导热系数k /W·(m·K)^-1	4
围岩恒压比热容C_ps /J·(kg·K)^-1	840
对流传热系数h_w /W·(m²·K)^-1	30
气体常数R /J·(kg·K)^-1	287
气体恒压比热容C_p /J·(kg·K)^-1	1004
初始温度T₀/℃	40
初始压力p₀/MPa	5.9

工况	体型参数K	储气库半径R/m	储气库长度L/m	入气口位置
1	2.5	10	25	顶部
2	5	7.937	39.685	顶部
3	10	6.3	63	顶部
4	20	5	100	顶部
5	10	6.3	63	中部

[1]	吴玉庭, 寇真峰, 张灿灿, 吴伊洋. 列管式固体氯化钠蓄冷换热器动态分布参数分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(6): 1988-1995.
[2]	刘迪, 张甜甜, 彭宇维, 唐晓梅, 王丹, 毛承雄. 压缩空气储能系统释能环节轴系建模与振荡分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(2): 563-572.
[3]	郑澳辉, 曹峥, 徐玉杰, 陈海生, 邓建强. 压缩空气储能驱动反渗透海水淡化系统[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(5): 1597-1606.
[4]	夏琦, 何阳, 徐玉杰, 陈海生, 邓建强. 绝热压缩空气储能系统冷热电联供与负荷匹配特性[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(5): 1494-1502.
[5]	郭丁彰, 尹钊, 周学志, 徐玉杰, 盛勇, 索文辉, 陈海生. 压缩空气储能系统储气装置研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(5): 1486-1493.
[6]	周升辉, 何阳, 陈海生, 徐玉杰, 邓建强. 喷射器强化压缩空气储能充能过程[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(5): 1503-1513.
[7]	李扬, 张新敬, 宋健斐, 李笑宇, 郭欢, 徐玉杰, 陈海生. 压缩空气储能系统释能过程动态调控[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(5): 1514-1523.
[8]	王星, 李文, 朱阳历, 左志涛, 陈海生. CAES轴流涡轮弯导叶优化设计与流动损失控制机理[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(5): 1524-1535.
[9]	徐冉, 左志涛, 黎翱, 王霞, 陈明, 陈海生. 基于析湿系数法活塞压缩机级间变工况析水特性[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(5): 1556-1564.
[10]	胡珊, 刘畅, 徐玉杰, 陈海生, 郭欢. 基于峰谷分时电价的压缩空气储能系统热经济性分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(5): 1607-1613.
[11]	虞启辉, 田利, 李晓飞, 李晓东, 谭心, 张业明. 考虑风能不确定性的压缩空气储能容量配置及经济性评估[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(5): 1614-1623.
[12]	吴玉庭, 宋阁阁, 张灿灿, 寇真峰, 鹿院卫. 超临界压缩空气储能系统蓄冷换热器优化设计[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(4): 1374-1379.
[13]	王晓露, 郭欢, 张华良, 徐玉杰, 刘英军, 陈海生. 火电厂热电联产机组与压缩空气储能集成系统能量耦合特性分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(2): 598-610.
[14]	侯磊, 王子驰, 李营超, 王赛豪, 张亚杰, 张禹森. 压缩空气储能系统分析及多目标优化[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(1): 379-384.
[15]	杨绪青, 余真珠, 杨肖虎, 刘　展. 压缩空气储能与吸收式热泵循环集成的热电联产系统[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(1): 362-369.

CAES储气库设计参数对其热力学特性影响

The influence of CAES reservoir design parameters on thermodynamic properties

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 19

参考文献 16

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价