基于熵理论的能量调节性能研究

doi:10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2023.0940

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在高比例风、光接入背景下，电力系统面临日益突出的能量调节压力。当下，储能作为构建新型电力系统的重要支撑面临配置成本高，利用率不足等问题。本工作基于克劳修斯熵理论，构建出一种可用于量化及评价能源系统能量-时间解耦能力的物理量——功率熵，系统研究了功率熵与功率、时长、容量等储能配置关键决策变量间的内在关系，发现功率熵与多种关键决策变量间具有一致的正相关关系，可用于衡量储能综合调节性能，同时功率熵还兼具体现储能功率时序特征的功能。基于功率熵所展现的特性，本工作建立了基于功率熵的电力系统储能配置优化分析方法，并通过模拟案例分析对功率熵在储能配置优化中的作用进行了验证。结果显示，在不同的储能配置下，系统功率熵增不同，系统优化方向是由储能引入系统的功率熵增逐渐减小的方向，也即储能调节性能冗余逐渐减少的方向。功率熵的概念为未来电力系统的储能配置优化，乃至综合能源系统内部多种能源形式的配置优化提供了一种新思路。

关键词: 储能技术, 优化配置, 克劳修斯熵, 功率熵

Abstract:

Considering the increasing importance of wind and solar energy, the power system increasingly faces prominent energy regulation pressure. Presently, energy storage, as an important supporting factor for building the new power system, faces problems such as high configuration costs and insufficient utilization. Based on Clausius entropy theory, this study constructs a physical quantity, power entropy, to quantify and evaluate the energy-time decoupling ability of an energy system. Taking an energy storage system as an analysis case, this study systematically studies the internal relationship between power entropy and key decision variables of energy storage configuration, such as power, duration, and capacity. It is found that there is a consistent positive correlation between power entropy and a variety of key decision variables, that can measure the comprehensive regulation performance of energy storage; additionally, power entropy also reflects the timing characteristics of energy storage. Based on these characteristics demonstrated by power entropy, this study establishes a power entropy-based optimization analysis method for power system energy storage configuration, and verifies the role of power entropy in energy storage configuration optimization through simulation case analysis. The results show that under different energy storage configurations, the increase in system power entropy is different; additionally, they show that the direction of system optimization is the direction in which the increase in power entropy introduced by energy storage decreases gradually, that is, the direction in which the redundancy of energy storage regulation performance decreases gradually. Thus, the concept of power entropy provides a new path for the optimization of energy storage configuration in future power systems and also for the optimization of multiple energy forms in the integrated energy system.

Key words: energy storage technology, optimal configuration, Clausius entropy, power entropy

中图分类号:

TM 911

孙振新, 张秩鸣, 马俯波, 蒋丛进, 杜昊易, 陈换军, 张玉魁. 基于熵理论的能量调节性能研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(5): 1584-1591.

Zhenxin SUN, Zhiming ZHANG, Fubo MA, Congjin JIANG, Haoyi DU, Huanjun CHEN, Yukui ZHANG. Investigation of energy regulation performance based on entropy theory[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2024, 13(5): 1584-1591.

图/表 7

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

参考文献 14

1	曹一家, 王光增, 曹丽华, 等. 基于潮流熵的复杂电网自组织临界态判断模型[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2011, 35(7): 1-6.
	CAO Y J, WANG G Z, CAO L H, et al. An identification model for self-organized criticality of power grids based on power flow entropy[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2011, 35(7): 1-6.
2	蒋群. 电力系统可靠性裕度评估[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2011.
	JIANG Q. Evaluation of power system reliability magin[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2011.
3	苟竞, 刘俊勇, 刘友波, 等. 基于能量熵测度的电力系统连锁故障风险辨识[J]. 电网技术, 2013, 37(10): 2754-2761.
	GOU J, LIU J Y, LIU Y B, et al. Energy entropy measure based risk identification of power system cascading failures[J]. Power System Technology, 2013, 37(10): 2754-2761.
4	李志民, 李卫星, 王永建. 基于熵理论的最优潮流代理约束算法[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2001, 25(11): 28-31.
	LI Z M, LI W X, WANG Y J. Surrogate constraint algorithm for optimal power flow based on the entropy theory[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2001, 25(11): 28-31.
5	钟静, 吕飞鹏, 孔德洪, 等. 基于加权潮流转移熵的电网脆弱线路辨识[J]. 电测与仪表, 2016, 53(10): 22-26.
	ZHONG J, LV F P, KONG D H, et al. Vulnerable lines identification of power grid based on weighted transfer entropy of power flow[J]. Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation, 2016, 53(10): 22-26.
6	朱成骐, 孙宏斌, 张伯明. 基于最大信息熵原理的短期负荷预测综合模型[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2005, 25(19): 1-6.
	ZHU C Q, SUN H B, ZHANG B M. A combined model for short term load forecasting based on maximum entropy principle[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2005, 25(19): 1-6.
7	慈松, 刘前卫, 康重庆, 等. 从"信息-能量" 基本关系看信息能源深度融合[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2021, 41(7): 2289-2297.
	CI S, LIU Q W, KANG C Q, et al. Fundamental exploration into ICT-energy fusion[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2021, 41(7): 2289-2297.
8	管霖, 卓映君, 周保荣, 等. 复杂波动时间序列的多尺度分解算法及其在可再生能源发电建模应用中的性能评估[J]. 南方电网技术, 2020, 14(6): 11-16, 32.
	GUAN L, ZHUO Y J, ZHOU B R, et al. Multi-scale decomposition algorithms for complicated fluctuant time series and their performance evaluation in renewable energy generation modeling[J]. Southern Power System Technology, 2020, 14(6): 11-16, 32.
9	李浩, 钟声远, 王永真, 等. 基于能量与信息耦合的分布式能源系统配置优化方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2020, 40(17): 5467-5476.
	LI H, ZHONG S Y, WANG Y Z, et al. Optimization method on the distributed energy system based on energy and information coupled[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2020, 40(17): 5467-5476.
10	张儒峰, 姜涛, 李国庆, 等. 基于最大熵原理的电-气综合能源系统概率能量流分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2019, 39(15): 4430-4441.
	ZHANG R F, JIANG T, LI G Q, et al. Maximum entropy based probabilistic energy flow calculation for integrated electricity and natural gas systems[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2019, 39(15): 4430-4441.
11	陈中, 胡吕龙, 丁楠. 基于改进熵的风光储互补并网系统优化运行[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2013, 41(21): 86-91.
	CHEN Z, HU L, DING N. Optimized operation of wind-solar-battery hybrid power system based on improved entropy[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2013, 41(21): 86-91.
12	ZHOU G Y, CHAN C C, ZHANG D, et al. Smart energy evolution road-map based on the correlation between energy and information[J]. Energy Procedia, 2019, 158: 3082-3087.
13	GUO H, XU Y J, CHEN H S, et al. Corresponding-point methodology for physical energy storage system analysis and application to compressed air energy storage system[J]. Energy, 2018, 143: 772-784.
14	李鹤龄. 信息熵、玻尔兹曼熵以及克劳修斯熵之间的关系——兼论玻尔兹曼熵和克劳修斯熵是否等价[J]. 大学物理, 2004, 23(12): 37-40.
	LI H L. The relation between information entropy, Boltzmann entropy and Clausius entropy[J]. College Physics, 2004, 23(12): 37-40.

[1]	肖厦颖, 范传光, 郭峰, 杨天鑫, 王栋, 黄云辉. 基于改进多目标粒子群算法的储能电站定容选址优化配置研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(2): 503-514.
[2]	李天晨, 尹建政, 张大伟, 刘小恒. 基于水电站储能技术的可再生能源并网策略研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(2): 677-679.
[3]	闫苏, 钟芳芳, 刘俊伟, 丁美, 贾传坤. 高能量密度液流电池关键材料与先进表征[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(1): 143-156.
[4]	张家俊, 李晓琼, 张振涛, 郝佳豪, 郑平洋, 于泽, 杨俊玲, 荆亚楠, 越云凯. 压缩二氧化碳储能系统研究进展[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(6): 1928-1945.
[5]	秦婷婷, 周学志, 郭丁彰, 盛勇, 徐玉杰, 左志涛, 李辉, 陈海生. 铁轨重力储能系统效率影响因素研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(3): 835-845.
[6]	侯美倩, 牛启帆, 邢洁, 单英浩. 计及可靠性的含源配电网储能系统的优化配置[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(2): 504-514.
[7]	袁治章, 刘宗浩, 李先锋. 液流电池储能技术研究进展[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(9): 2944-2958.
[8]	姚祯, 张琦, 王锐, 刘庆华, 王保国, 缪平. 生物质衍生碳材料在全钒液流电池电极方面的应用[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(7): 2083-2091.
[9]	李洪涛, 张帅, 李旭东, 纪运广, 孙明旭, 李欣. 单罐式储能换热系统在热风无纺布工艺中的应用[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(7): 2250-2257.
[10]	赵志伟, 杨智, 彭章泉. 飞行时间二次离子质谱在锂基二次电池中的应用[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(3): 781-794.
[11]	周晗, 李正宇, 徐俊辉, 陈留平, 龚领会. 我国可再生能源与盐穴氢储能技术耦合发电的分析与展望[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(12): 4059-4066.
[12]	李红霞, 李建林, 米阳. 新能源侧储能优化配置技术研究进展[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(10): 3257-3267.
[13]	汤匀, 岳芳, 郭楷模, 李岚春, 陈伟. 下一代电化学储能技术国际发展态势分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(1): 89-97.
[14]	张子岩, 张俊艳. 基于高质量专利的储能关键技术国际竞争态势[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(1): 321-334.
[15]	姚祯, 王锐, 阳雪, 张琦, 刘庆华, 王保国, 缪平. 锌铁液流电池研究现状及展望[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(1): 78-88.