基于一阶RC模型的高频超级电容器电容成分分析

doi:10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2025.0460

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

电化学阻抗谱（EIS）作为表征电极材料及电化学储能器件动力学行为的核心工具，可有效解析高频超级电容器中电荷转移与物质传输的耦合过程。为定量解析高频电容成分，本工作首先利用一阶RC模型提取电化学阻抗谱中能准确反应高频超级电容器性能的特征参数，随后将实测EIS数据作为特征输入参量，利用遗传算法对电容组分进行全局优化拟合，实现高频电容成分的定量解耦。为了验证该方法的普适性，选取石墨烯膜、碳纳米管膜、炭化三聚氰胺泡沫及商业化YP50F多孔炭为模型电极，开展高频EIS测试，并基于实测EIS数据开展电容成分分析。分析结果表明，高频电容呈现多弛豫特性：能量存储过程可解耦为C_Debye，C_HN，及C_RBM弛豫过程，同时阐明弱短程离子相互作用是超级电容器优异高频响应性能的关键参数。本研究揭示了高频超级电容器电容成分的物理起源，所提出的分析方法为高频超级电容器材料筛选与界面工程提供了理论工具。

关键词: 超级电容器, 高频行为, 电化学阻抗谱, 遗传算法, 电容成分

Abstract:

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) serves as a cornerstone technique for elucidating the dynamic interplay within electrode materials and electrochemical energy storage systems, offering unparalleled insights into the coupled mechanisms of charge transfer and ionic transport in high-frequency supercapacitors. To enable precise quantification of high-frequency capacitance components, this study employs a first-order RC equivalent circuit model to extract discriminative electrochemical parameters from impedance spectra that correlate with device performance. The extracted parameters are subsequently integrated as input variables into a genetic algorithm-driven optimization framework, which performs global parameter fitting to achieve quantitative decoupling of distinct capacitance contributions. To validate the methodological robustness and universality of this approach, four representative electrode systems—graphene film, carbon nanotube film, carbonized melamine foam, and commercial YP50F porous carbon—were systematically investigated through high-frequency EIS characterization. Capacitance decomposition analysis, based on the acquired impedance datasets, revealed that high-frequency capacitance behavior exhibits multi-relaxation dynamics, which can be resolved into three distinct contributions: C_Debye, C_HN, and C_RBM relaxation processes. Notably, the dominance of weak short-range ionic interactions was identified as the critical determinant governing the superior high-frequency response characteristics observed in these supercapacitor systems. These findings unravel the fundamental physical origins underpinning the capacitance composition in high-frequency supercapacitors. The proposed integrated analysis methodology provides a robust theoretical framework for accelerating material optimization and interface engineering strategies tailored for high-frequency supercapacitors.

Key words: supercapacitors, high-frequency behavior, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, genetic algorithm, capacitor composition

中图分类号:

TM53

范亚锋, 易宗琳, 谢莉婧, 李晓明, 苏方远. 基于一阶RC模型的高频超级电容器电容成分分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, doi: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2025.0460.

Yafeng FAN, Zonglin Yi, Lijing Xie, Xiaoming Li, Fangyuan SU. Capacitor composition analysis of high-frequency supercapacitors based on first-order RC model[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, doi: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2025.0460.

图/表 8

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

表1

参考文献 29

1	Li C, Li X, Liu G, et al. Microcrack Arrays in Dense Graphene Films for Fast-Ion-Diffusion Supercapacitors[J]. Small, 2023: 2301533.
2	Wu M, Sun K, He J, et al. Hierarchically 3D Fibrous Electrode for High-Performance Flexible AC-Line Filtering in Fluctuating Energy Harvesters[J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2023: 2305039.
3	Zhang C, Jiao X, Wang Y, et al. An ultra-low-temperature alternating current filter[J]. Small, 2024, 20(2): 2305949.
4	Li Z, Xu M, Xia Y, et al. High-frequency supercapacitors surpassing dynamic limit of electrical double layer effects[J]. Nature Communications, 2025, 16(1): 3704.
5	Li Q, Sun S, Smith A D, et al. Compact and low loss electrochemical capacitors using a graphite/carbon nanotube hybrid material for miniaturized systems[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2019, 412: 374-383.
6	Han F, Qian O, Meng G, et al. Structurally integrated 3D carbon tube grid-based high-performance filter capacitor[J]. Science, 2022, 377(6609): 1004-1007.
7	M. Santhosh N, Upadhyay K K, Filipič G, et al. Widening the limit of capacitance at high frequency for AC line-filtering applications using aqueous carbon-based supercapacitors[J]. Carbon, 2023, 203: 686-694.
8	Sun Q, Cao Z, Ma Z, et al. Dipole–Dipole Interaction Induced Electrolyte Interfacial Model To Stabilize Antimony Anode for High-Safety Lithium-Ion Batteries[J]. ACS Energy Letters, 2022, 7(10): 3545-3556.
9	Forse A C, Griffin J M, Merlet C, et al. Direct observation of ion dynamics in supercapacitor electrodes using in situ diffusion NMR spectroscopy[J]. Nature Energy, 2017, 2(3): 16216.
10	Yu J, Yu C, Song X, et al. Microscopic-Level Insights into Solvation Chemistry for Nonsolvating Diluents Enabling High-Voltage/Rate Aqueous Supercapacitors[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2023, 145(25): 13828-13838.
11	Zhang K, Zhou G, Fang T, et al. Different shapes based on ionic liquid leading to a two-stage discharge process[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2022, 10(14): 7684-7693.
12	Lasia A. Impedance of porous electrodes[J]. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 1995, 397(1-2): 27-33.
13	Paasch G, Micka K, Gersdorf P. Theory of the electrochemical impedance of macrohomogeneous porous electrodes[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 1993, 38(18): 2653-2662.
14	Bisquert J, Garcia-Belmonte G, Fabregat-Santiago F, et al. Anomalous transport effects in the impedance of porous film electrodes[J]. Electrochemistry Communications, 1999, 1(9): 429-435.
15	Gaberšček M. Understanding Li-based battery materials via electrochemical impedance spectroscopy[J]. Nature Communications, 2021, 12(1): 6513.
16	Gu C, Yin L, Li S, et al. Differential capacitance of ionic liquid and mixture with organic solvent[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2021, 367: 137517.
17	Zhang Q, Liu X, Yin L, et al. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy on the capacitance of ionic liquid–acetonitrile electrolytes[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2018, 270: 352-362.
18	Drüschler M, Huber B, Roling B. On capacitive processes at the interface between 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tris(pentafluoroethyl)trifluorophosphate and Au(111)[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2011, 115(14): 6802-6808.
19	Sangoro J, Cosby T, Kremer F. Rotational and Translational Diffusion in Ionic Liquids[M]. Paluch M. Dielectric Properties of Ionic Liquids. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016: 29-51.
20	Dyre J C, Schrøder T B. Universality of ac conduction in disordered solids[J]. Reviews of Modern Physics, 2000, 72(3): 873-892.
21	Schönhals A, Kremer F. Analysis of Dielectric Spectra[M]. Kremer F, Schönhals A. Broadband Dielectric Spectroscopy. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2003: 59-98.
22	Roling B, Drüschler M, Huber B. Slow and fast capacitive process taking place at the ionic liquid/electrode interface[J]. Faraday Discussions, 2012, 154: 303-311.
23	Baldelli S. Surface structure at the ionic liquid-electrified metal interface[J]. Accounts of Chemical Research, 2008, 41(3): 421-431.
24	Anderson E, Grozovski V, Siinor L, et al. Influence of the electrode potential and in situ STM scanning conditions on the phase boundary structure of the single crystal Bi(111)\|1-butyl-4-methylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate interface[J]. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 2013, 709: 46-56.
25	Pajkossy T, Kolb D M. The interfacial capacitance of Au(100) in an ionic liquid, 1-butyl-3-methyl-imidazolium hexafluorophosphate[J]. Electrochemistry Communications, 2011, 13(3): 284-286.
26	Yin L, Huang Y, Chen H, et al. A mean-field theory on the differential capacitance of asymmetric ionic liquid electrolytes. II. Accounts of ionic interactions[J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2018, 20(26): 17606-17614.
27	Goodwin Z A H, Feng G, Kornyshev A A. Mean-field theory of electrical double layer in ionic liquids with account of short-range correlations[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2017, 225: 190-197.
28	Kornyshev A A. Double-layer in ionic liquids: Paradigm change?[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2007, 111(20): 5545-5557.
29	Kilic M S, Bazant M Z, Ajdari A. Steric effects in the dynamics of electrolytes at large applied voltages. I. Double-layer charging[J]. Physical Review E, 2007, 75(2): 021502.

	石墨烯膜电极	碳纳米管膜电极	炭化泡沫电极
C_Debye (μF cm^-2)	0.91	1.54	98.17
C_HN (μF cm^-2)	29.90	84.58	284.61
C_RBM (μF cm^-2)	76.67	28.87	35.88
τ_Debye (s)	1.74×10^-4	9.28×10^-6	8.84×10^-5
τ_HN (s)	1.00×10^-2	1.00×10^-2	1.00×10^-2
τ_RBM (s)	7.09×10^-2	9.56×10^-1	6.25×10^-1
α	0.88	0.35	0.25
β	0.40	3.00	2.81
γ	0.36	0.58	0.59

[1]	闫震, 刘强, 李会彬, 张俊, 蒋亚辉. 基于混合储能荷电状态的光伏微网功率优化管理方法[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2025, 14(5): 2067-2077.
[2]	徐桂培, 刘浩, 赖洁文, 卢毅锋, 黄辉, 邸会芳, 王振兵. 干法电极技术在超级电容器和锂离子电池中的研究进展[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2025, 14(4): 1445-1460.
[3]	杨智颖, 卢伟, 姚嘉, 程阳, 伍德坚, 文海龙. 基于变密度拓扑优化的液冷板散热流道设计[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2025, 14(2): 702-713.
[4]	何智峰, 陶远哲, 胡泳钢, 王其聪, 杨勇. 机器学习强化的电化学阻抗谱技术及其在锂离子电池研究中的应用[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(9): 2933-2951.
[5]	孙丙香, 杨鑫, 周兴振, 马仕昌, 王志豪, 张维戈. 基于简化阻抗模型和比较元启发式算法的锂离子电池参数辨识方法[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(9): 2952-2962.
[6]	雷晶晶, 李泽皓, 陈斌斌, 黄登高. 基于电化学阻抗谱的电芯内部温度估计研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(8): 2823-2834.
[7]	刘新, 毛喜玲, 闫欣雨, 王俊强, 李孟委. 三维孔道NiMn-MOF电极材料制备及电化学性能研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(2): 361-369.
[8]	唐盼春, 严嵘, 张灿, 孙泽. 堆叠式车载超级电容器热管理方式分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(2): 483-491.
[9]	宋元明, 刘亚杰, 金光, 周星, 黄旭程. 锂离子电池/超级电容器混合储能系统能量管理方法综述[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(2): 652-668.
[10]	闵越明, 张闯, 刘文杰, 刘素贞, 徐志成. 锂离子电池微过充循环老化特性与失效机理研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(10): 3343-3356.
[11]	朱迪, 赵杨阳, 艾邓鑫, 张利, 周咏. 基于遗传算法的飞轮储能电机多工况效率优化[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(10): 3582-3592.
[12]	肖也, 徐磊, 闫崇, 黄佳琦. 锂电池用参比电极的设计与应用[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(1): 82-91.
[13]	郝增辉, 刘训良, 孟缘, 孟楠, 温治. 电极界面微观结构对固态锂离子电池性能的影响[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(7): 2095-2104.
[14]	刘宇龄, 孟锦豪, 彭乔, 刘天琪, 王扬, 蔡永翔. 基于NSGA-II遗传算法的锂电池均衡指标优化[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(6): 1946-1956.
[15]	李林泽, 张向文. 基于组合频率阻抗特征的锂离子电池健康状态估算[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(5): 1705-1712.