空压机喘振现象及防喘技术浅析

doi:10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2020.0184

储能科学与技术 ›› 2020, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (S1): 70-77.doi: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2020.0184

空压机喘振现象及防喘技术浅析

刘石^1,²(), 黄正^1,³, 胡亚轩^1,², 杨毅^1,², 高庆水^1,², 张楚^1,², 翁洪杰^1,², 安然然^1,², 李德波^1,², 杜胜磊^1,², 刘志刚^1,²

^1.广东电网有限责任公司，广东广州 510600
^2.广东电科院能源技术有限责任公司，广东广州 510630
^3.广东电网有限责任公司电力科学研究院，广东广州 510800

收稿日期:2020-05-20 修回日期:2020-05-29 出版日期:2020-12-05 发布日期:2020-12-02
通讯作者: 刘石 E-mail:caes_ls@163.com
作者简介:刘石（1974—），男，博士，主要研究方向电网调度及储能，E-mail：caes_ls@163.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFB0903604)

Brief analysis on surge phenomenon and anti-surge technology of air compressor

Shi LIU^1,²(), Zheng HUANG^1,³, Yaxuan HU^1,², Yi YANG^1,², Qingshui GAO^1,², Chu ZHANG^1,², Hongjie WENG^1,², Ranran AN^1,², Debo LI^1,², Shenglei DU^1,², Zhigang LIU^1,²

^1.Guangdong Power Grid Co. Ltd. , Guangzhou 510600, Guangdong, China
^2.Guangdong Diankeyuan Energy Technology Co. Ltd. , Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong, China
^3.Electric Power Research Institute of Guangdong Power Grid Co. Ltd. , Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China

Received:2020-05-20 Revised:2020-05-29 Online:2020-12-05 Published:2020-12-02
Contact: Shi LIU E-mail:caes_ls@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为预防和解决核心关键部件空压机正常工作的最大不利固有因素——喘振现象的影响，本文通过对国内外相关文献的调研和探讨，分析压缩机喘振发生的参数变化和硬件诱因并进行定性说明，指出压缩机喘振现象的外在表现特征，明确喘振发生位置不确定且系统尺寸结构对喘振行为有较大影响，并对经验判定临界值B进行说明。总结提出硬件和软件防喘技术措施，阐述了基建和扩压器、叶轮、外壳等硬件结构对喘振影响进而指出对应的防喘措施和实施效果。通过图形和公式分别介绍固定极限流量法、变极限流量法和主动控制法等软硬件结合防喘振技术的原理，对比分析这几种技术的优势和特点以及可起到的作用，并对喘振检测的技术手段进行总结分类。最后对计算流体力学(CFD)技术进行了重点介绍，总结预测未来防喘振技术发展趋势。综合分析认为利用CFD结合主动控制防喘振技术会在将来发挥更加重要的作用，将帮助失速和喘振研究从定性接近定量，并实现压缩空气储能的空压机高效设计研发和正常高性能运行。

关键词: 压缩空气储能, 喘振, 固定极限法, 变极限流量法, 主动控制法, 计算流体力学

Abstract:

The impact of surge phenomenon is one of the biggest disadvantageous inherent factors in the normal operation of the core key component of air compressor. To address this issue, this work was performed through the investigation and discussion of the domestic and foreign-related literature to analyzes the parameter change and hardware inducement of the compressor surge to explore the external performance characteristics of the compressor surge phenomenon. It has been found that surge location is uncertain and the size structure of the system has a great effect on surge behavior, and the empirical critical value B is explained. This paper summarizes and puts forward anti-surge technical measures of the hardware and software, expounds on the impact of infrastructure, diffuser, impeller, shell, and other hardware structures on the surge, and points out the corresponding anti-surge measures and implementation effect. The principles of the fixing limit flow method, variable limit flow method and active control method with software and hardware were introduced in this work. The advantages, characteristics, and functions of these technologies are compared and analyzed, then the technical means of surge detection are summarized and classified. Finally, the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) technology is mainly introduced followed by the recent advancement in anti-surge technology and their future predictions are summarized. Comprehensive analysis shows that CFD combined with active control anti-surge technology will play a more important role in the future, which will help stall and surge research from qualitative to quantitative and achieve high-efficiency design and development of compressed air energy storage air compressor and normal high-performance operation.

Key words: compressed air energy storage, surge, fixing limit method, variable limit flow method, active control method, computational fluid dynamics

中图分类号:

TK 02

刘石, 黄正, 胡亚轩, 杨毅, 高庆水, 张楚, 翁洪杰, 安然然, 李德波, 杜胜磊, 刘志刚. 空压机喘振现象及防喘技术浅析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2020, 9(S1): 70-77.

Shi LIU, Zheng HUANG, Yaxuan HU, Yi YANG, Qingshui GAO, Chu ZHANG, Hongjie WENG, Ranran AN, Debo LI, Shenglei DU, Zhigang LIU. Brief analysis on surge phenomenon and anti-surge technology of air compressor[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2020, 9(S1): 70-77.

图/表 1

参考文献 36

1	SINSEL S R, RIEMKE R L , HOFFMANN V H. Challenges and solution technologies for the integration of variable renewable energy sources—A review[J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 145: 2271-2285.
2	张建军, 周盛妮, 李帅旗, 等. 压缩空气储能技术现状与发展趋势[J]. 新能源进展, 2018, 6(2): 140-150.
	ZHANG Jianjun, ZHOU Shengni, LI Shuaiqi, et al. Overview and development tendency of compressed air energy storage[J]. Advances in New and Renewable Energy, 2018, 6(2): 140-150.
3	庞永超. 先进绝热压缩空气储能系统热力性能研究[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2017.
	PANG Yongchao. Analysis of thermal performance for advanced adiabatic compressed air energy storage systems[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2017.
4	左立庆. 空气压缩机防喘振阀关键技术研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2018.
	ZUO Liqing. Research on key technology of anti-surge valve of air compressor[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2018.
5	陈征. 离心式空气压缩机组防喘振控制系统的设计[D]. 沈阳: 东北大学, 2016.
	CHEN Zheng. Design of anti surge control system of centrifugal air compressor[D]. Shenyang: Northeastern University, 2016.
6	吴锋, 牛哲, 王志鑫, 等. 离心式压缩机喘振控制浅析[J]. 石油化工自动化, 2019, 55(4): 41-44.
	WU Feng, NIU Zhe, WANG Zhixin, et al. Brief analysis on the control of centrifugal compressor surge[J]. Automation in Petro-Chemical Industry, 2019, 55(4): 41-44.
7	吴丹, 赵军. 吸气参数对螺杆空压机运行能耗影响的研究分析[J]. 压缩机技术, 2019(2): 7-11.
	WU Dan, ZHAO Jun. Research and analysis of influence of suction parameters on energy consumption of screw air compressor station[J]. Compressor Technology, 2019(2): 7-11.
8	徐黎明. 离心式压缩机喘振原因分析及防范措施[J]. 石化技术, 2014, 21(1): 40-43.
	XU Liming. Analysis and solution for surge in centrifugal compressor[J]. Petrochemical Industry Technology, 2014, 21(1): 40-43.
9	DAY I J. Stall, surge, and 75 years of research[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2016, 138(1): doi:10.1115/1.4031473.
10	MOËNNE-LOCCOZ V, TREBINJAC I, BENICHAOU E, et al. An experimental description of the flow in a centrifugal compressor from alternate stall to surge[J]. Journal of Thermal Science, 2017, 26(4): 289-296.
11	赵阳, 王志恒, 席光. 离心压缩机喘振动态特性的数值研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2019, 40(10): 2252-2258.
	ZHAO Yang, WANG Zhiheng, XI Guang. Numerical investigation of dynamic characteristic of surge in a centrifugal compressor[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2019, 40(10): 2252-2258.
12	HUANG Xiubao. A shock tube simulation of the transient stall to surge of an axial compressor[J]. Chinese Journal of Turbomachinery, 2018, 60(3): 1-13.
13	XUE Xiang, WANG Tong, ZHANG Tongtong, et al. Mechanism of stall and surge in a centrifugal compressor with a variable vaned diffuser[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2018, 31(6): 1222-1231.
14	GREITZER E. Surge and rotating stall in axial flow compressors (Ⅰ): Theoretical compression system model[J]. ASME Journal of Engineering and Power, 1976, 98(1): 190-198.
15	GREITZER E. Surge and rotating stall in axial flow compressors (Ⅱ): Experimental results and comparison with theory[J]. ASME Journal of Engineering and Power, 1976, 98(2): 199-211.
16	MIZUKI S, ASAGA Y, ONO Y, et al. Investigation of surge behavior in a micro centrifugal compressor[J]. Journal of Thermal Science, 2006, 15(2): 97-102.
17	刘嘉诚, 周正贵. 提高超声速压气机级喘振裕度方法研究[J]. 推进技术, 2019, 40(8): 1780-1791.
	LIU Jiachen, ZHOU Zhenggui. Study of improving surge margin for a supersonic compressor stage[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2019, 40(8): 1780-1791.
18	DAY I J. Stall inception in axial flow compressors[J]. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 1993, 115(1): 1-9.
19	HOUGHTON T, DAY I J. Stability enhancement by casing grooves: The importance of stall inception mechanism and solidity[J]. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2010, 134(2): doi:10.1115/1.4002986.
20	STRAZISAR A J, BRIGHT M M, THORP M, et al. Compressor stall control through endwall recirculation[C]//ASME Turbo Expo, 2004: 1-13.
21	张佰伦. 离心式压缩机防喘振控制系统的研究[D]. 厦门: 厦门大学, 2017.
	ZHANG Bailun. The research of centrifugal compressor anti-surge control system[D]. Xiamen: Xiamen University, 2017.
22	张中楠, 刘旺开, 钱鹏. 压缩空气制冷测控系统的防喘振方法[J]. 兵工自动化, 2012, 31(3): 83-85.
	ZHANG Zhongnan, LIU Wangkai, QIAN Peng. Anti-surge method of compressing air refrigeration measurement and control system[J]. Ordnance Industry Automation, 2012, 31(3): 83-85.
23	田晔. 基于模糊控制的离心压缩机防喘振的研究[J]. 机械管理开发, 2019(2): 74-76.
	TIAN Ye. Research on anti-surge vibration of centrifugal compressor based on fuzzy control[J]. Mechanical Management and Development, 2019(2): 74-76.
24	EPSTEIN A H, FFOWCS W J E, GREITZER E M. Active suppression of aerodynamic instabilities in turbomachines[J]. Journal of Propulsion & Power, 1989, 5(2): 204-211.
25	PADUANO J, EPSTEIN A H, VALAVANI L, et al. Active control of rotating stall in a low speed axial compressor[J]. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 1993, 115(1): 48-56.
26	张倩. 离心式压缩机的喘振及防喘振控制分析[J]. 化工管理, 2019(20): 143-144.
	ZHANG Qian. Analysis on surge and anti surge control of centrifugal compressor[J]. Chemical Enterprise Management, 2019(20): 143-144.
27	BLANCHINI F, GIANNATTASIO P. Adaptive control of compressor surge instability[J]. Automatica, 2002, 38(8): 1373-1380.
28	ARTHUR K M, BASU H, YOON S Y. Stabilization of compressor surge in systems with uncertain equilibrium flow[J]. ISA Transactions, 2019, 93: 115-124.
29	MCDOUGALL N, CUMPSTY N, HYNES T. Stall inception in axial compressors[J]. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 1990, 112(1): 116-123.
30	HELLSTROM E, OSSAREH H, XIAO Baitao, et al. Characterizing and detecting surge and co-surge in automotive compressors[J]. IFAC-PaperOnlines, 2016, 49(11): 702-707.
31	姜莉莉, 张晶. 压缩机喘振检测技术专利发展综述[J]. 制冷与空调, 2018, 18(7): 74-79.
	JIANG Lili, ZHANG Jing. Analysis of patents of compressor surge detectial technology[J]. Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning, 2018, 18(7): 74-79.
32	曾胜庭, 陈曦, 马琎晨, 等. CFB锅炉回料阀低频喘振的计算颗粒流体力学模拟[J]. 热力发电, 2018, 47(8): 22-30.
	ZENG Shengting, CHEN Xi, MA Jinchen, et al. CPFD simulation on low-frequency vibration of loop seal in CFB boilers[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2018, 47(8): 22-30.
33	DEHNER R, SELAMET A, KELLER P, et al. Simulation of deep surge in a turbocharger compression system[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2016, 138(11): doi: 10.1115/1.4033260.
34	HENDRICKS G J, SABNIS J S, FEULNER M R. Analysis of instability inception in high-speed multistage axial-flow compressors[J]. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 1997, 119(4): 714-722.
35	徐上峰. 动态模拟在离心压缩机防喘振系统设计中的应用[J]. 石油化工设备技术, 2018, 39(4): 1-4+69.
	XU Shangfeng. Application of dynamic simulation in centrifugal compressor anti-surge system engineering[J]. Petro-chemical Equipment Technology, 2018, 39(4): 1-4+69.
36	崔月红, 静玉晓, 杨泽军. 离心压缩机防喘振阀特性的动态模拟研究[J]. 石油和化工设备, 2019(9): 76-78.
	CUI Yuehong, JING Yuxiao, YANG Zejun. Dynamic simulation research on the anti-surge valve of centrifugal compressor[J]. Petro-chemical Equipment, 2019(9): 76-78.

[1]	吴玉庭, 寇真峰, 张灿灿, 吴伊洋. 列管式固体氯化钠蓄冷换热器动态分布参数分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(6): 1988-1995.
[2]	刘迪, 张甜甜, 彭宇维, 唐晓梅, 王丹, 毛承雄. 压缩空气储能系统释能环节轴系建模与振荡分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(2): 563-572.
[3]	郑澳辉, 曹峥, 徐玉杰, 陈海生, 邓建强. 压缩空气储能驱动反渗透海水淡化系统[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(5): 1597-1606.
[4]	夏琦, 何阳, 徐玉杰, 陈海生, 邓建强. 绝热压缩空气储能系统冷热电联供与负荷匹配特性[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(5): 1494-1502.
[5]	郭丁彰, 尹钊, 周学志, 徐玉杰, 盛勇, 索文辉, 陈海生. 压缩空气储能系统储气装置研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(5): 1486-1493.
[6]	周升辉, 何阳, 陈海生, 徐玉杰, 邓建强. 喷射器强化压缩空气储能充能过程[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(5): 1503-1513.
[7]	李扬, 张新敬, 宋健斐, 李笑宇, 郭欢, 徐玉杰, 陈海生. 压缩空气储能系统释能过程动态调控[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(5): 1514-1523.
[8]	王星, 李文, 朱阳历, 左志涛, 陈海生. CAES轴流涡轮弯导叶优化设计与流动损失控制机理[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(5): 1524-1535.
[9]	徐冉, 左志涛, 黎翱, 王霞, 陈明, 陈海生. 基于析湿系数法活塞压缩机级间变工况析水特性[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(5): 1556-1564.
[10]	胡珊, 刘畅, 徐玉杰, 陈海生, 郭欢. 基于峰谷分时电价的压缩空气储能系统热经济性分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(5): 1607-1613.
[11]	虞启辉, 田利, 李晓飞, 李晓东, 谭心, 张业明. 考虑风能不确定性的压缩空气储能容量配置及经济性评估[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(5): 1614-1623.
[12]	吴玉庭, 宋阁阁, 张灿灿, 寇真峰, 鹿院卫. 超临界压缩空气储能系统蓄冷换热器优化设计[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(4): 1374-1379.
[13]	王晓露, 郭欢, 张华良, 徐玉杰, 刘英军, 陈海生. 火电厂热电联产机组与压缩空气储能集成系统能量耦合特性分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(2): 598-610.
[14]	万发, 蒋中明, 唐栋. CAES储气库设计参数对其热力学特性影响[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(1): 370-378.
[15]	侯磊, 王子驰, 李营超, 王赛豪, 张亚杰, 张禹森. 压缩空气储能系统分析及多目标优化[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(1): 379-384.

空压机喘振现象及防喘技术浅析

Brief analysis on surge phenomenon and anti-surge technology of air compressor

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 1

参考文献 36

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价