Energy Storage Science and Technology ›› 2022, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (12): 3768-3775.doi: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2022.0406

• Energy Storage Materials and Devices • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Application of polyethylene glycolmethyl ether acrylate in all-solid-state batteries

Suli LI1(), Peng WU1(), Yirong XIAO2, Peiwen YU2, Yuede PAN3(), Wen YANG2()   

  1. 1.Zhu Hai Cosmx Battery Co. Ltd. , Zhuhai 519180, Guangdong, China
    2.Key Laboratory of Cluster Science of Ministry of Education Beijing Key Laboratory of Photoelectronic/Electrophotonic Conversion Materials School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 102488, China
    3.Institute of Energy Innovation, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, Shanxi, China
  • Received:2022-07-19 Revised:2022-08-18 Online:2022-12-05 Published:2022-12-29
  • Contact: Yuede PAN, Wen YANG E-mail:Lisuli@cosmx.com;panyuede@tyut.edu.cn;wenyang@bit.edu.cn

Abstract:

Solid polymer electrolyte is one of the critical materials in all solid polymer lithium-ion batteries. The main challenge for solid polymer electrolytes is their low conductivity and poor electrochemical stability. In this study, a novel solid polymer electrolyte named PMEA@SSE) was prepared by combining poly (ethylene glycol) methyl ether acrylate (PMEA) with polyethylene oxide (PEO), based on the Li+-conducting mechanism of polymer electrolyte. PEO electrolyte (PEO@SSE) was prepared as the control sample. The PMEA@SSE was evaluated by Fourier transform infrared spectrometer, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, linear sweep voltammetry, scanning electron microscope, energy dispersive spectrometer, X-ray diffraction, and cell testing. The results revealed that the electrochemical stability window of PMEA@SSE was similarly higher than that of PEO@SSE (4.2 V vs. 3.8 V) and that the ion conductivity of PMEA@SSE was higher than that of PEO@SSE (0.13 mS/cm vs 0.018 mS/cm, tested at 30 ℃). Furthermore, the solid-state battery prepared using PMEA@SSE exhibited better cycle performance than PEO@SSE (77 vs. 31 cycles with a capacity retention of 80%). This work demonstrates that partially replacing PEO with PMEA is a feasible strategy for advancing the classical PEO solid electrolyte for application in all solid lithium batteries and provides new insights for further developing solid polymer electrolytes.

Key words: solid polymer electrolyte, poly (ethylene glycol) methyl ether acrylate, solid-state battery

CLC Number: