压缩空气储能系统透平负荷控制策略的研究与仿真实现

doi:10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2025.0367

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对压缩空气储能系统中空气透平面临的变工况调节问题，本文对采用“节流+补气”配气方式的空气透平进行了变工况分析，对比了透平负荷调节的分程控制和补气压力控制两种策略。首先建立了某10MW/110MWh压缩空气储能系统全工况动态仿真模型，通过多学科仿真建模技术实现了热力系统动态特性与控制系统的统一平台实时求解，得到了透平变工况动态特性，进一步验证了不同透平负荷控制策略的调节效果。仿真实验结果表明：考虑到在全滑压范围内透平负荷稳定输出和系统气耗率因素，分程控制策略性能更高，当节流调节阀未达到全开时，应进一步增加节流阀开度至最大，在额定进气参数下，分程控制策略可降低0.35%气耗率。

关键词: 透平负荷, 分程控制, 补气压力控制, 多学科仿真, 节流+补气, 压缩空气储能

Abstract:

Aiming at the problem of variable operating condition adjustment of the air turbine in the compressed air energy storage system, this paper analyzes the variable operating condition of the air turbine using the "throttling + air supplement" distribution mode, and compares the two strategies of the split range control and the air supplement pressure control of the turbine load regulation. Firstly, a dynamic simulation model of a 10MW/110MWh compressed air energy storage system under all working conditions was established. Through multidisciplinary simulation modeling technology, a unified platform was realized to solve the dynamic characteristics of the thermal system and the control system in real time, and the dynamic characteristics of the turbine under varying working conditions were obtained, and the adjustment effects of different turbine load control strategies were further verified. The simulation results show that: considering the factors of turbine load stability output and system gas consumption rate in the full sliding pressure range, the split range control strategy has higher performance. When the throttle control valve is not fully open, the throttle valve opening should be further increased to the maximum. Under the rated intake parameters, the split range control strategy can reduce the gas consumption rate by 0.35%.

Key words: turbine load, split-range control, supplementary air pressure control, multidisciplinary simulation, throttle and supplementary air injection, compressed air energy storage (CAES)

中图分类号:

TK02

赵峰, 杨明成, 郝宁, 陈东, 刘佳, 陈逸伦. 压缩空气储能系统透平负荷控制策略的研究与仿真实现[J]. 储能科学与技术, doi: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2025.0367.

Feng ZHAO, Ming-cheng YANG, Ning HAO, Dong CHEN, Chuan-liang LIU, Yi-lun CHEN. Research and Simulation Implementation of Turbine Load Control Strategies in Compressed Air Energy Storage Systems[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, doi: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2025.0367.

图/表 13

表1

图1

图2

图3

图4

表2

表3

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

参考文献 18

[1]	梅生伟, 李瑞, 陈来军, 等. 先进绝热压缩空气储能技术研究进展及展望[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2018, 38(10): 2893-2907, 3140.
	Mei Shengwei, Li Rui, Chen Laijun, et al.An Overview and Outlook on Advanced Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage Technique [J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2018, 38(10): 2893-2907, 3140.
[2]	李鹏, 李国能, 苏航, 等. 不同运行方案下AA-CAES系统性能分析及优化[J]. 动力工程学报, 2022, 42(9): 843-851.
	Li Peng, Li Guoneng, Su Hang, et al. Performance Analysis and Optimization of AA-CAES System Under Different Operation Schemes [J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2022, 42 (9): 843-851
[3]	张荣发, 郝宁, 刘传亮, 等. 绝热式压缩空气储能系统中换热器的影响分析[J]. 发电设备, 2025, 39(1): 7-13.
	ZHANG Rongfa, HAO Ning, LIU Chuanliang, et al. Analysis on the Influence of Heat Exchangers in Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage System [J]. Power Equipment, 2025, 39(1): 7-13.
[4]	余海鹏, 祝海义, 赫广迅, 等. 储罐压缩空气储能全周期满负荷运行膨胀透平系统研究[J]. 汽轮机技术, 2022, 64(3): 203-206.
	YU Haipeng, ZHU Haiyi, HE Guangxun, et al. Research on Expansion Turbine System of Full Cycle and Full Load Operationof Storage Tank Compressed Air Energy Storage [J]. TURBINE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 64(3): 203-206.
[5]	徐殿吉, 祝海义, 徐鹏, 等. 300MW压缩空气储能二次再热空气透平[J]. 汽轮机技术, 2023, 65(6): 414-416, 476.
	XU Dianji, ZHU Haiyi, XU Peng, et al. The Secondary Reheat Air Turbine of 300MW Compressed Air Energy Storage [J]. TURBINE TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 65(6): 414-416, 476.
[6]	凌晨, 吴斌, 朱学成, 等. 350MW级压缩空气储能系统配气方式优化研究[J]. 汽轮机技术, 2024, 66(1): 9-12, 17.
	Ling Chen, Wu Bin, Zhu Xuecheng, et al. Optimization of Gas Distribution Mode for 350MW Compressed Air Energy Storage System [J]. TURBINE TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 66(1): 9-12, 17.
[7]	HAN Z, GUO S. Investigation of discharge characteristics of a tri-generative system based on advanced adiabatic compressed air energy storage[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 176: 110-122.
[8]	ADAMS T A I, NEASE J, TUCKER D, 等. Energy Conversion with Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Systems: A Review of Concepts and Outlooks for the Short- and Long-Term[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(9): 3089-3111.
[9]	郭欢, 徐玉杰, 张新敬, 等. 蓄热式压缩空气储能系统变工况特性[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2019, 39(5): 1366-1377.
	GUO Huan, XU Yujie, ZHANG Xinjing, et al. Off-design Performance of Compressed Air Energy Storage System With Thermal Storage [J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2019, 39(5): 1366-1377.
[10]	孙晓霞, 桂中华, 高梓玉, 等. 压缩空气储能系统动态运行特性[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(6): 1840-1853.
	SUN Xiaoxia, GUI Zhonghua, GAO Ziyu, et al. Dynamic characteristics of compressed air energy storage system [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(6): 1840-1853.
[11]	李扬, 张新敬, 宋健斐, 等. 压缩空气储能系统释能过程动态调控[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(5): 1514-1523.
	LI Yang, ZHANG Xinjing, SONG Jianfei, et al. Dynamic regulation and control of the discharge process in compressed air energy storage system [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2021, 10(5): 1514-1523.
[12]	王娟丽, 罗方, 范小平, 等. 某300MW压缩空气储能透平深度滑压运行参数优化研究[J]. 汽轮机技术, 2024, 66(4): 312-314.
	WANG Juanli, LUO Fang, FAN Xiaoping, et al. Optimization of Deep Sliding Pressure Operation Parametersof a 300MW Compressed Air Energy Storage Turbine [J]. TURBINE TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 66(4): 312-314.
[13]	赫广迅, 余海鹏, 孙嘉, 等. 压缩空气储能透平滑压运行参数优化研究[J]. 汽轮机技术, 2023, 65(1): 77-80.
	HE Guangxun, YU Haipeng, SUN Jia, et al. Optimization of Turbine Slip Pressure Operation Parameters for Compressed Air Energy Storage[J]. TURBINE TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 65(1): 77-80.
[14]	陈辉, 李文, 盛勇, 等. CAES释能过程多工况动态仿真及效率分析[J]. 动力工程学报, 2023, 43(7): 869-876, 892.
	CHEN Hui, LI Wen, SHENG Yong, et al. Dynamic Simulation and Efficiency Analysis of Energy Release Process in Compressed Air Energy Storage Under Multi Conditions [J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2023, 43(7): 869-876, 892.
[15]	GUO Z, DENG G, FAN Y, 等. Performance optimization of adiabatic compressed air energy storage with ejector technology[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 94: 193-197.
[16]	李阳海, 张旭, 王廷举, 等. 变入口压力下大容量压缩空气储能电站空气透平动态过程及调节特性研究[J]. 汽轮机技术, 2024, 66(3): 207-211, 216.
	LI Yanghai, ZHANG Xu, WANG Tingju, et al. Dynamic Process and Regulation Characteristics Research of Air Turbine Train of Large-capacity Compressed Air Energy Storage Unit under Variable Pressure [J]. TURBINE TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 66(3): 207-211, 216.
[17]	季晨龙, 黄雨瑶, 李良. 基于大-小给水调节阀切换的直流蒸汽发生器过热度控制[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2023, 45(16): 80-84.
	JI Chenlong, HUANG Yuyao, LI Liang. Superheat control for once-through steam generator based on feed valve switching [J]. SHIP SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 45(16): 80-84.
[18]	冯勇军. 分程控制系统分程点计算浅析[J]. 工业仪表与自动化装置, 2019(4): 70-74.
	FENG Yongjun. A brief analysis of the split point calculation of split control system [J]. INDUSTRIAL INSTRUMENTATION & AUTOMATION, 2019(4): 70-74.

地点	功率/容量 MW/MW*h	透平配气方式	储气方式
江苏金坛	60/300	节流	盐穴
湖北应城	300/1500	节流+1段补气	盐穴
甘肃酒泉	300/1800	节流+2段补气	人工硐室
甘肃通渭	10/110	节流+2段补气	压力管道
内蒙乌兰察布	60/240	节流+2段补气	压力管道+人工硐室

参数	单位	设计值	仿真值	偏差%	设计值	仿真值	偏差%	设计值	仿真值	偏差%	设计值	仿真值	偏差%
工况		工况1			工况2			工况3			工况4
气库压力	MPa	10.76	10.76	0.00	7.93	7.93	0.00	6.83	6.83	0.00	5.66	5.66	0.00
气库出气流量	kg/s	24.31	24.43	0.51	24.31	24.17	-0.57	25.47	25.54	0.29	28.16	28.21	0.18
加热器1气侧温度	MPa	185.00	185.00	0.00	185.00	185.00	0.00	185.00	185.00	0.00	185.00	185.00	0.00
加热器2气侧温度	MPa	185.00	185.00	0.00	185.00	185.00	0.00	185.00	185.00	0.00	185.00	185.40	0.22
加热器3气侧温度	MPa	185.00	185.00	0.00	185.00	185.00	0.00	185.00	185.00	0.00	185.00	185.00	0.00
透平 1#膨胀比	/	4.05	4.08	0.72	4.05	4.08	0.72	3.38	3.40	0.50	2.50	2.51	0.52
透平 2#膨胀比	/	4.68	4.73	0.95	4.66	4.70	0.92	4.67	4.71	0.87	4.72	4.76	0.85
透平 3#膨胀比	/	4.69	4.74	0.94	4.57	4.61	0.93	4.82	4.86	0.91	5.31	5.36	0.97
透平发电量	MW	10.00	10.00	0.04	10.00	10.01	0.05	10.00	10.00	0.02	10.00	10.01	0.05

工况	透平控制方式	透平进口温度 ℃	节流阀CV值	释能时间 s	平均进气流量 kg/s	平均发电功率 MWh	气耗率 kg/kwh
1	分程控制	185	183.219	28830	23.209	9.998	8.357
2	补气压力控制	185	183.219	28770	23.266	10.000	8.376
3	分程控制	195	183.219	29545	22.648	9.999	8.154
4	补气压力控制	195	183.219	29405	22.761	10.005	8.190
5	分程控制	175	183.219	28110	23.804	9.998	8.571
6	补气压力控制	175	183.219	28165	23.767	9.980	8.573
7	分程控制	185	201.5409	28880	23.178	9.997	8.347
8	补气压力控制	185	201.5409	28775	23.263	9.998	8.376