锂离子电池不同服役工况下失效研究进展

doi:10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2023.0655

储能科学与技术 ›› 2024, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (4): 1338-1349.doi: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2023.0655

锂离子电池不同服役工况下失效研究进展

韩亚露¹^,³(), 陈奕戈², 邸会芳¹, 林杰欢², 王振兵¹, 张扬², 苏方远¹, 陈成猛¹()

^1.中国科学院山西煤炭化学研究所，山西太原 030001
^2.广东电网有限责任公司惠州供电局，广东惠州 516000
^3.中国科学院大学，北京 100049

收稿日期:2023-09-15 修回日期:2023-10-07 出版日期:2024-04-26 发布日期:2024-04-22
通讯作者: 陈成猛 E-mail:hanyalu20@mails.ucas.ac.cn;ccm@sxicc.ac.cn
作者简介:韩亚露（1998—），女，博士研究生，研究方向为锂离子电池失效分析，E-mail：hanyalu20@mails.ucas.ac.cn；
基金资助:
山西省重点研发计划项目(201903D121007);山西省重点研发计划项目(2021020660301013)

Research progress on failure of lithium-ion batteries under different service conditions

Yalu HAN¹^,³(), Yige CHEN², Huifang DI¹, Jiehuan LIN², Zhenbing WANG¹, Yang ZHANG², Fangyuan SU¹, Chengmeng CHEN¹()

^1.Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Taiyuan 030001, Shanxi, China
^2.Huizhou Power Supply Bureau of Guangdong Power Grid Corporation, Huizhou 516000, Guangdong, China
^3.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2023-09-15 Revised:2023-10-07 Online:2024-04-26 Published:2024-04-22
Contact: Chengmeng CHEN E-mail:hanyalu20@mails.ucas.ac.cn;ccm@sxicc.ac.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

锂离子电池在长期服役时极易出现失效现象，包括内阻增大、容量衰减、析锂、产气等，其失效过程难以监测，容易导致锂离子电池的安全性、可靠性和使用寿命严重降低。通过研究搁置、长循环及浮充等不同服役工况下电池的失效原因，了解电池失效机制，可以快速监测电池的健康状态和服役寿命。本文对不同服役工况下电池失效的相关研究进行探讨，综述了在不同温度、电压和荷电状态等条件下服役时，锂离子电池内部正极、负极、隔膜和电解液的失效机理，着重介绍了电池在不同电压和温度下的搁置性能、搁置下的失效模型、长循环后正负极结构的变化、高温浮充后的失效机制及产气机理。同时也有针对性地提出了锂电负极材料、隔膜、电解液及正极材料等相关要素的优化方案。综合分析表明电极中活性锂的损失、活性物质的损失、颗粒的破裂、过渡金属的溶出、固体电解质界面膜（SEI）分解等都会引起锂离子电池的失效。减小颗粒粒径、加入电解液成膜添加剂以及优化隔膜的穿透性等，有望降低锂离子电池在长期服役过程中的失效速率，确保锂离子电池安全稳定运行。

关键词: 锂离子电池, 失效, 搁置, 长循环, 浮充

Abstract:

Lithium-ion batteries are susceptible to failure during extended use, manifesting as increased internal resistance, capacity decay, lithium plating, and gas generation, among other issues. The challenge of monitoring these failure processes can significantly compromise the safety, reliability, and lifespan of these batteries. Investigating the causes of battery failure under various service conditions, such as calendar aging, extensive cycling, and floating charge, is crucial for understanding the failure mechanisms and effectively monitoring the battery's health and lifespan. This paper reviews existing research on battery failure under different conditions and summarizes the failure mechanisms within the internal components of lithium-ion batteries-cathode, anode, separator, and electrolyte-under various temperature, voltage, and state of charge conditions. It highlights the effects of voltage and temperature on calendar aging, models of failure due to calendar aging, alterations in cathode and anode materials after prolonged cycling, failure mechanisms following high-temperature float charging, and the mechanisms of battery gas generation. Additionally, it proposes targeted optimization strategies for anode materials, separators, electrolytes, and cathode materials in lithium batteries. Comprehensive analysis indicates that failure in lithium-ion batteries can result from lithium loss in electrodes, active material loss, particle breakdown, transition metal dissolution, and solid electrolyte interface decomposition. By minimizing particle size, incorporating electrolyte film-forming additives, and enhancing separator permeability, the failure rate of lithium-ion batteries during long-term service can be reduced, ensuring their safe and stable operation.

Key words: lithium-ion battery, failure, calendar aging, long cycles, floating charge

中图分类号:

O 646.54

韩亚露, 陈奕戈, 邸会芳, 林杰欢, 王振兵, 张扬, 苏方远, 陈成猛. 锂离子电池不同服役工况下失效研究进展[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(4): 1338-1349.

Yalu HAN, Yige CHEN, Huifang DI, Jiehuan LIN, Zhenbing WANG, Yang ZHANG, Fangyuan SU, Chengmeng CHEN. Research progress on failure of lithium-ion batteries under different service conditions[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2024, 13(4): 1338-1349.

图/表 9

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

参考文献 44

1	VETTER J, NOV\'AK P, WAGNER M R, et al. Ageing mechanisms in lithium-ion batteries[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2005, 147(1): 269-281.
2	WEISS M, RUESS R, KASNATSCHEEW J, et al. Fast charging of lithium-ion batteries: A review of materials aspects[J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2021, 11(33): 2101126.
3	JOW T R, DELP S A, ALLEN J L, et al. Factors limiting Li⁺charge transfer kinetics in Li-ion batteries[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2018, 165(2): A361-A367.
4	LIU Q Q, DU C Y, SHEN B, et al. Understanding undesirable anode lithium plating issues in lithium-ion batteries[J]. RSC Advances, 2016, 6(91): 88683-88700.
5	WALDMANN T, HOGG B I, WOHLFAHRT-MEHRENS M. Li plating as unwanted side reaction in commercial Li-ion cells - A review[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2018, 384: 107-124.
6	XU K, VON CRESCE A, LEE U. Differentiating contributions to "ion transfer" barrier from interphasial resistance and Li⁺ desolvation at electrolyte/graphite interface[J]. Langmuir, 2010, 26(13): 11538-11543.
7	LIN X K, KHOSRAVINIA K, HU X S, et al. Lithium plating mechanism, detection, and mitigation in lithium-ion batteries[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2021, 87: 100953.
8	LEGRAND N, KNOSP B, DESPREZ P, et al. Physical characterization of the charging process of a Li-ion battery and prediction of Li plating by electrochemical modelling[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2014, 245: 208-216.
9	BIRKENMAIER C, BITZER B, HARZHEIM M, et al. Lithium plating on graphite negative electrodes: Innovative qualitative and quantitative investigation methods[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2015, 162(14): A2646-A2650.
10	PASTOR-FERNÁNDEZ C, BRUEN T, WIDANAGE W D, et al. A study of cell-to-cell interactions and degradation in parallel strings: Implications for the battery management system[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2016, 329: 574-585.
11	BIRKL C R, ROBERTS M R, MCTURK E, et al. Degradation diagnostics for lithium ion cells[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2017, 341: 373-386.
12	CHANDRASEKARAN R. Quantification of bottlenecks to fast charging of lithium-ion-insertion cells for electric vehicles[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2014, 271: 622-632.
13	HEIN S, LATZ A. Influence of local lithium metal deposition in 3D microstructures on local and global behavior of Lithium-ion batteries[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2016, 201: 354-365.
14	YU Z Y, BAI M H, SONG W F, et al. Influence of lithium difluorophosphate additive on the high voltage LiNi_0.8Co_0.1Mn_0.1O₂/graphite battery[J]. Ceramics International, 2021, 47(1): 157-162.
15	LI H Y, LIU A, ZHANG N, et al. An unavoidable challenge for Ni-rich positive electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries[J]. Chemistry of Materials, 2019, 31(18): 7574-7583.
16	KO D S, PARK J H, YU B Y, et al. Degradation of high-nickel-layered oxide cathodes from surface to bulk: A comprehensive structural, chemical, and electrical analysis[J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2020, 10(36): 2001035.
17	ROMANO BRANDT L, MARIE J J, MOXHAM T, et al. Synchrotron X-ray quantitative evaluation of transient deformation and damage phenomena in a single nickel-rich cathode particle[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2020, 13(10): 3556-3566.
18	WANG L, QIU J Y, WANG X D, et al. Insights for understanding multiscale degradation of LiFePO₄ cathodes[J]. eScience, 2022, 2(2): 125-137.
19	刘晓梅, 姚斌, 谢乐琼, 等. 磷酸铁锂动力电池常温循环衰减机理分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(4): 1338-1343.
	LIU X M, YAO B, XIE L Q, et al. Analysis of the capacity fading mechanism in lithium iron phosphate power batteries cycled at ambient temperatures[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2021, 10(4): 1338-1343.
20	STIASZNY B, ZIEGLER J C, KRAUß E E, et al. Electrochemical characterization and post-mortem analysis of aged LiMn₂O₄-NMC/graphite lithium ion batteries part II: Calendar aging[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2014, 258: 61-75.
21	KRUPP A, BECKMANN R, DIEKMANN T, et al. Calendar aging model for lithium-ion batteries considering the influence of cell characterization[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2022, 45: 103506.
22	KHALEGHI RAHIMIAN S, FOROUZAN M M, HAN S, et al. A generalized physics-based calendar life model for Li-ion cells[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2020, 348: 136343.
23	SUI X, ŚWIERCZYŃSKI M, TEODORESCU R, et al. The degradation behavior of LiFePO₄/C batteries during long-term calendar aging[J]. Energies, 2021, 14(6): 1732.
24	HAHN S L, STORCH M, SWAMINATHAN R, et al. Quantitative validation of calendar aging models for lithium-ion batteries[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2018, 400: 402-414.
25	STREHLE B, FRIEDRICH F, GASTEIGER H A. A comparative study of structural changes during long-term cycling of NCM-811 at ambient and elevated temperatures[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2021, 168(5): 050512.
26	CHAE B G, PARK S Y, SONG J H, et al. Evolution and expansion of Li concentration gradient during charge-discharge cycling[J]. Nature Communications, 2021, 12: 3814.
27	XU G J, PANG C G, CHEN B B, et al. Prescribing functional additives for treating the poor performances of high-voltage (5 V-class) LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄/MCMB Li-ion batteries[J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2018, 8(9): 1701398.
28	TAN S, SHADIKE Z, LI J Z, et al. Additive engineering for robust interphases to stabilize high-Ni layered structures at ultra-high voltage of 4.8 V[J]. Nature Energy, 2022, 7: 484-494.
29	WANG Y, CHANG X W, LI Z Y, et al. Preventing sudden death of high-energy lithium-ion batteries at elevated temperature through interfacial ion-flux rectification[J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2023, 33(4): 2208329.
30	PETZ D, BARAN V, PESCHEL C, et al. Aging-driven composition and distribution changes of electrolyte and graphite anode in 18650-type Li-ion batteries[J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2022, 12(45): 2201652.
31	王其钰, 王朔, 张杰男, 等. 锂离子电池失效分析概述[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2017, 6(5): 1008-1025.
	WANG Q Y, WANG S, ZHANG J N, et al. Overview of the failure analysis of lithium ion batteries[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2017, 6(5): 1008-1025.
32	MOTAPON S N, LACHANCE E, DESSAINT L A, et al. A generic cycle life model for lithium-ion batteries based on fatigue theory and equivalent cycle counting[J]. IEEE Open Journal of the Industrial Electronics Society, 2020, 1: 207-217.
33	SEVERSON K A, ATTIA P M, JIN N, et al. Data-driven prediction of battery cycle life before capacity degradation[J]. Nature Energy, 2019, 4: 383-391.
34	史永胜, 李锦, 任嘉睿, 等. 基于WOA-XGBoost的锂离子电池剩余使用寿命预测[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(10): 3354-3363.
	SHI Y S, LI J, REN J R, et al. Prediction of residual service life of lithium-ion battery using WOA-XGBoost[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(10): 3354-3363.
35	YI S Z, WANG B, CHEN Z A, et al. The difference in aging behaviors and mechanisms between floating charge and cycling of LiFePO₄/graphite batteries[J]. Ionics, 2019, 25(5): 2139-2145.
36	尹涛, 郑莉莉, 贾隆舟, 等. 锂离子电池浮充电研究综述[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(1): 310-318.
	YIN T, ZHENG L L, JIA L Z, et al. Overview of research on float charging for lithium-ion batteries[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2021, 10(1): 310-318.
37	GUAN T, SUN S, GAO Y Z, et al. The effect of elevated temperature on the accelerated aging of LiCoO₂/mesocarbon microbeads batteries[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 177: 1-10.
38	HIROOKA M, SEKIYA T, OMOMO Y, et al. Improvement of float charge durability for LiCoO₂ electrodes under high voltage and storage temperature by suppressing O1-Phase transition[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2020, 463: 228127.
39	XIA J, NELSON K J, LU Z H, et al. Impact of electrolyte solvent and additive choices on high voltage Li-ion pouch cells[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2016, 329: 387-397.
40	赵伟, 肖祥, 梅成林. 磷酸铁锂/石墨电池浮充工况下的失效机理研究[J]. 电源技术, 2020, 44(4): 492-495.
	ZHAO W, XIAO X, MEI C L. Study on failure mechanism of LiFePO₄/graphite battery under floating charge[J]. Chinese Journal of Power Sources, 2020, 44(4): 492-495.
41	孔令丽, 张克军, 夏晓萌, 等. 高电压锂离子电池高温浮充性能影响因素分析与改善[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2019, 8(6): 1165-1170.
	KONG L L, ZHANG K J, XIA X M, et al. Analysis and improvement of high temperature floating charge performance for high voltage lithium ion batteries[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2019, 8(6): 1165-1170.
42	TSUJIKAWA T, YABUTA K, MATSUSHITA T, et al. A study on the cause of deterioration in float-charged lithium-ion batteries using LiMn₂O₄ as a cathode active material[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2011, 158(3): A322.
43	尹涛. 浮充工况下储能锂离子电池性能研究[D]. 青岛: 青岛大学, 2022.
	YIN T. Study on performance of energy storage lithium-ion battery under floating charge condition[D]. Qingdao: Qingdao University, 2022.
44	李懿洋. 锂离子电池低温充放电循环与高温浮充下的失效机理研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2017.
	LI Y Y. Study on the failure mechanism of lithium-ion batteries under low-temperature charge-discharge cycles and high-temperature float charge[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2017.

[1]	袁悦博, 王贺武, 孔祥栋, 蒲明伟, 孙玉坤, 韩雪冰, 欧阳明高. 金属异物缺陷演化特性及其对产线 K 值的影响机制[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(4): 1197-1204.
[2]	李革, 孔祥栋, 孙跃东, 陈飞, 袁悦博, 韩雪冰, 郑岳久. 基于产线大数据的锂离子电池一致性动态特性分选方法[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(4): 1188-1196.
[3]	刘淳正, 来沛霈, 孙卓, 聂耳, 张哲娟. 构造凹陷的硅碳颗粒提高锂离子电池负极电化学性能[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(4): 1302-1309.
[4]	李炳金, 韩晓霞, 张文杰, 曾伟国, 武晋德. 锂离子电池剩余使用寿命预测方法综述[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(4): 1266-1276.
[5]	杨家沐, 陈育新, 练成, 徐至, 刘洪来. 电极浆料涂布模头流场分析与结构优化[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(4): 1109-1117.
[6]	王玉婷, 李秋桐, 胡一鸣, 郭新. 锂离子电池内部信号监测技术概述[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(4): 1253-1265.
[7]	孙明明. 有机无机复合锂离子电池固态电解质专利分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(3): 1096-1105.
[8]	刘剑, 于立博, 吴振兴, 牟介刚. 基于风冷的锂离子电池充放电设备热特性影响研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(3): 914-923.
[9]	武美玲, 牛磊, 李世友, 赵冬妮. 正极预锂化添加剂用于锂离子电池的研究进展[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(3): 759-769.
[10]	张稚国, 李华清, 王莉, 何向明. 锂离子电池塑料-金属复合集流体的特性及制备研究进展[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(3): 749-758.
[11]	申小雨, 尹丛勃. 基于卷积Fastformer的锂离子电池健康状态估计[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(3): 990-999.
[12]	胡大林, 任潘利, 张昌明, 杨明阳, 卢周广. Al-Y-Zr原位共掺杂提高4.53 V钴酸锂正极材料的循环性能[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(3): 742-748.
[13]	李校磊, 高健, 周伟东, 李泓. COMSOL Multiphysics在锂离子电池中的应用[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(2): 546-567.
[14]	彭可, 张志成, 胡有章, 张旭辉, 周稼辉, 李彬. 基于有限元的热力耦合场匣钵运动分析与优化[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(2): 634-642.
[15]	雷旗开, 余胤, 彭鹏, 陈满, 金凯强, 王青松. 隔热材料布局方式对280 Ah磷酸铁锂电池热失控传播抑制效果的影响[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(2): 495-502.

锂离子电池不同服役工况下失效研究进展

Research progress on failure of lithium-ion batteries under different service conditions

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 44

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价