机器学习强化的电化学阻抗谱技术及其在锂离子电池研究中的应用

doi:10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2024.0708

储能科学与技术 ›› 2024, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (9): 2933-2951.doi: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2024.0708

• AI辅助先进电池设计与应用专刊 • 上一篇下一篇

机器学习强化的电化学阻抗谱技术及其在锂离子电池研究中的应用

何智峰¹(), 陶远哲¹, 胡泳钢¹^,², 王其聪⁴, 杨勇¹^,²^,³()

^1.厦门大学固体表面物理化学国家重点实验室，化学与化工学院化学系
^2.厦门大学能源材料化学协同创新中心(iChEM)，化学与化工学院化学系
^3.厦门大学能源学院
^4.厦门大学信息学院;计算机系，福建厦门 361005

收稿日期:2024-07-31 修回日期:2024-08-22 出版日期:2024-09-28 发布日期:2024-09-20
通讯作者: 杨勇 E-mail:hzf13107618190@163.com;yyang@xmu.edu.cn
作者简介:何智峰（2000—），男，硕士研究生，研究方向为机器学习在锂离子电池老化研究中的应用，E-mail：hzf13107618190@163.com；
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划专项(2021YFB2401800)

Machine learning-enhanced electrochemical impedance spectroscopy for lithium-ion battery research

Zhifeng HE¹(), Yuanzhe TAO¹, Yonggang HU¹^,², Qicong Wang⁴, Yong YANG¹^,²^,³()

^1.State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University
^2.Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Materials (iChEM), Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University
^3.College of Energy, Xiamen University
^4.Department of Computer Science, School of Informatics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, China

Received:2024-07-31 Revised:2024-08-22 Online:2024-09-28 Published:2024-09-20
Contact: Yong YANG E-mail:hzf13107618190@163.com;yyang@xmu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

随着电气化的发展，全球动力电池和储能电池的需求迅猛增加。然而，人们对电池使用安全性和可靠性的关注使得电池老化状态的精准诊断和预测成为电池界重要且富有挑战的研究领域之一。电化学阻抗谱(EIS)因其可以解耦电池内部不同频域过程常被用于电池复杂老化过程状态的解析，而通过机器学习方法不仅可以高效获取和解析EIS数据，而且可促进对电池老化和失效机制的深入理解。本文综述了近年来机器学习方法在EIS技术中的应用，重点讨论了通过机器学习获取和解析EIS数据，进而实现对电池寿命评估预测。此外，本文讨论了数据融合方法在实现电池老化行为分析和寿命预测中的前景，当前机器学习在EIS研究中存在的局限性，以及对未来基于EIS实现电池寿命预测进行了展望。

关键词: 锂离子电池, 电化学阻抗谱, 机器学习, 寿命预测, 数据驱动

Abstract:

The rapid proliferation of electrification has driven a global surge in the demand for power and energy storage batteries. This rise has intensified concerns regarding battery safety and reliability, emphasizing the need for accurate methods for diagnosing and predicting battery aging, making this a notable area of research in the battery domain. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is widely used to analyze the complex aging processes of batteries because it can effectively decouple various frequency-domain processes. The integration of machine learning methods not only facilitates the acquisition and analysis of EIS data but also offers deeper insights into battery aging and failure mechanisms. This paper reviews the latest applications of machine learning methods in EIS technique, focusing on machine learning-based acquisition and analysis of EIS data for battery life assessment and prediction. In addition, this paper explores the potential of data fusion methods for analyzing the aging behavior of batteries and predicting their lifespan, discusses the current limitations of applying machine learning to EIS research, and describes the future prospects of EIS-based battery life prediction.

Key words: lithium-ion batteries, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, machine learning, lifetime prediction, data-driven

中图分类号:

TM 911

何智峰, 陶远哲, 胡泳钢, 王其聪, 杨勇. 机器学习强化的电化学阻抗谱技术及其在锂离子电池研究中的应用[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(9): 2933-2951.

Zhifeng HE, Yuanzhe TAO, Yonggang HU, Qicong Wang, Yong YANG. Machine learning-enhanced electrochemical impedance spectroscopy for lithium-ion battery research[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2024, 13(9): 2933-2951.

图/表 15

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

图5

图6

表2

图7

图8

表3

表4

图9

表5

图10

参考文献 108

1	GUO R H, WANG F, AKBAR RHAMDHANI M, et al. Managing the surge: A comprehensive review of the entire disposal framework for retired lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles[J]. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2024, 92: 648-680. DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2024.01.055.
2	国际能源署. 2024年全球电动汽车展望:国际能源署报告[R]. 巴黎:国际能源署. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2024.
	International Energy Agency. Global EV Outlook 2024: IEA Report[R]. Paris: International Energy Agency. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2024.
3	ZHAO J Y, FENG X N, PANG Q Q, et al. Battery safety: Machine learning-based prognostics[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2024, 102: 101142. DOI: 10.1016/j.pecs.2023.101142.
4	CHEN S Y, GAO Z H, SUN T J. Safety challenges and safety measures of Li-ion batteries[J]. Energy Science & Engineering, 2021, 9(9): 1647-1672. DOI: 10.1002/ese3.895.
5	SONG K, HU D, TONG Y, et al. Remaining life prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on health management: A review[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2023, 57: 106193. DOI: 10.1016/j.est. 2022.106193.
6	BARAI A, UDDIN K, DUBARRY M, et al. A comparison of methodologies for the non-invasive characterisation of commercial Li-ion cells[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2019, 72: 1-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.pecs.2019.01.001.
7	WAN X H, XU X J, LI F K, et al. Application of nondestructive testing technology in device-scale for lithium-ion batteries[J]. Small Structures, 2024, 5(3): 2300196. DOI: 10.1002/sstr. 202300196.
8	郝奕帆, 祝夏雨, 王静, 等. 电池无损检测监测方法分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(5): 1713-1737. DOI: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2023.0081.
	HAO Y F, ZHU X Y, WANG J, et al. Analysis of battery nondestructive testing and monitoring methods[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(5): 1713-1737. DOI: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2023.0081.
9	DAYANI S, MARKÖTTER H, SCHMIDT A, et al. Multi-level X-ray computed tomography (XCT) investigations of commercial lithium-ion batteries from cell to particle level[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2023, 66: 107453. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2023.107453.
10	LEE M Y, LEE J, SHIN Y, et al. Multiscale imaging techniques for real-time, noninvasive diagnosis of Li-ion battery failures[J]. Small Science, 2023, 3(11): DOI: 10.1002/smsc.202300063.
11	DU X H, MENG J H, AMIRAT Y, et al. Exploring impedance spectrum for lithium-ion batteries diagnosis and prognosis: A comprehensive review[J]. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2024, 95: 464-483. DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2024.04.005.
12	WANG S S, ZHANG J B, GHARBI O, et al. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy[J]. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2021, 1: 41. DOI: 10.1038/s43586-021-00039-w.
13	VIVIER V, ORAZEM M E. Impedance analysis of electrochemical systems[J]. Chemical Reviews, 2022, 122(12): 11131-11168. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00876.
14	LU Y, ZHAO C Z, HUANG J Q, et al. The timescale identification decoupling complicated kinetic processes in lithium batteries[J]. Joule, 2022, 6(6): 1172-1198. DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2022.05.005.
15	MC CARTHY K, GULLAPALLI H, RYAN K M, et al. Review-use of impedance spectroscopy for the estimation of Li-ion battery state of charge, state of health and internal temperature[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2021, 168(8): 080517. DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/ac1a85.
16	HU W X, PENG Y F, WEI Y M, et al. Application of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy to degradation and aging research of lithium-ion batteries[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2023, 127(9): 4465-4495. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c00033.
17	LV C D, ZHOU X, ZHONG L X, et al. Machine learning: An advanced platform for materials development and state prediction in lithium-ion batteries[J]. Advanced Materials, 2022, 34(25): e2101474. DOI: 10.1002/adma.202101474.
18	SHU X, SHEN S Q, SHEN J W, et al. State of health prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on machine learning: Advances and perspectives[J]. iScience, 2021, 24(11): 103265. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103265.
19	FINEGAN D P, SQUIRES I, DAHARI A, et al. Machine-learning-driven advanced characterization of battery electrodes[J]. ACS Energy Letters, 2022, 7(12): 4368-4378. DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c01996.
20	WANG X Y, WEI X Z, ZHU J G, et al. A review of modeling, acquisition, and application of lithium-ion battery impedance for onboard battery management[J]. eTransportation, 2021, 7: 100093. DOI: 10.1016/j.etran.2020.100093.
21	DUAN Y Z, TIAN J P, LU J H, et al. Deep neural network battery impedance spectra prediction by only using constant-current curve[J]. Energy Storage Materials, 2021, 41: 24-31. DOI: 10. 1016/j.ensm.2021.05.047.
22	GUO J, CHE Y H, PEDERSEN K, et al. Battery impedance spectrum prediction from partial charging voltage curve by machine learning[J]. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2023, 79: 211-221. DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2023.01.004.
23	KO C J, CHEN K C. Constructing battery impedance spectroscopy using partial current in constant-voltage charging or partial relaxation voltage[J]. Applied Energy, 2024, 356: 122454. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122454.
24	SUN Y, XIONG R, MENG X F, et al. Battery degradation evaluation based on impedance spectra using a limited number of voltage-capacity curves[J]. eTransportation, 2024, 22: 100347. DOI: 10.1016/j.etran.2024.100347.
25	WU L F, ZHANG Y. Attention-based encoder-decoder networks for state of charge estimation of lithium-ion battery[J]. Energy, 2023, 268: 126665. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.126665.
26	CAI L, MENG J H, STROE D I, et al. An evolutionary framework for lithium-ion battery state of health estimation[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2019, 412: 615-622. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.12.001.
27	MENG J H, CAI L, STROE D I, et al. An optimized ensemble learning framework for lithium-ion Battery State of Health estimation in energy storage system[J]. Energy, 2020, 206: 118140. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118140.
28	LI A, WEST A C, PREINDL M. Characterizing degradation in lithium-ion batteries with pulsing[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2023, 580: 233328. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233328.
29	TIAN J P, XIONG R, CHEN C, et al. Simultaneous prediction of impedance spectra and state for lithium-ion batteries from short-term pulses[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2023, 449: 142218. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2023.142218.
30	TANG X P, LAI X, LIU Q, et al. Predicting battery impedance spectra from 10-second pulse tests under 10 Hz sampling rate[J]. iScience, 2023, 26(6): 106821. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106821.
31	TEMIZ S, KURBAN H, EROL S, et al. Regeneration of lithium-ion battery impedance using a novel machine learning framework and minimal empirical data[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2022, 52: 105022. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2022.105022.
32	TEMIZ S, EROL S, KURBAN H, et al. State of charge and temperature-dependent impedance spectra regeneration of lithium-ion battery by duplex learning modeling[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2023, 64: 107085. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2023.107085.
33	SUN Y, XIONG R, WANG C X, et al. Deep neural network based battery impedance spectrum prediction using only impedance at characteristic frequencies[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2023, 580: 233414. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233414.
34	MIYAZAKI Y, NAKAYAMA R, YASUO N, et al. Bayesian statistics-based analysis of AC impedance spectra[J]. AIP Advances, 2020, 10(4): 045231. DOI: 10.1063/1.5143082.
35	ZHU S, SUN X Y, GAO X Y, et al. Equivalent circuit model recognition of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy via machine learning[J]. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 2019, 855: 113627. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.113627.
36	AL-ALI A, MAUNDY B, ALLAGUI A, et al. Optimum impedance spectroscopy circuit model identification using deep learning algorithms[J]. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 2022, 924: 116854. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116854.
37	BUTEAU S, DAHN J R. Analysis of thousands of electrochemical impedance spectra of lithium-ion cells through a machine learning inverse model[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2019, 166(8): A1611-A1622. DOI: 10.1149/2.1051908jes.
38	ZULUETA A, ZULUETA E, OLARTE J, et al. Electrochemical impedance spectrum equivalent circuit parameter identification using a deep learning technique[J]. Electronics, 2023, 12(24): 5038. DOI: 10.3390/electronics12245038.
39	SCHAEFFER J, GASPER P, GARCIA-TAMAYO E, et al. Machine learning benchmarks for the classification of equivalent circuit models from electrochemical impedance spectra[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2023, 170(6): 060512. DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/acd8fb.
40	BONGIORNO V, GIBBON S, MICHAILIDOU E, et al. Exploring the use of machine learning for interpreting electrochemical impedance spectroscopy data: Evaluation of the training dataset size[J]. Corrosion Science, 2022, 198: 110119. DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2022.110119.
41	SUN J, ZHANG W, CHEN Y, et al. What is the appropriate data representation of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy in machine-learning analysis?[J/OL]. ChemRxiv, 2024. [2024-04-29]. DOI:10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-mdpw8.
42	MAKOGON A, KANOUFI F, SHKIRSKIY V. Is unsupervised dimensionality reduction sufficient to decode the complexities of electrochemical impedance spectra?[J]. ChemElectroChem, 2024, 11(7): DOI: 10.1002/celc.202300738.
43	IURILLI P, BRIVIO C, WOOD V. Detection of lithium-ion cells' degradation through deconvolution of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy with distribution of relaxation time[J]. Energy Technology, 2022, 10(10): 2200547. DOI: 10.1002/ente.202200547.
44	TUNCER E, GUBANSKI S M. On dielectric data analysis. Using the Monte Carlo method to obtain relaxation time distribution and comparing non-linear spectral function fits[J]. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, 2001, 8(3): 310-320. DOI: 10.1109/94.933337.
45	HERSHKOVITZ S, TOMER S, BALTIANSKI S, et al. ISGP: Impedance spectroscopy analysis using evolutionary programming procedure[J]. ECS Transactions, 2011, 33(40): 67-73. DOI: 10.1149/1.3589186.
46	BOUKAMP B A. Fourier transform distribution function of relaxation times; application and limitations[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2015, 154: 35-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.12.059.
47	SACCOCCIO M, WAN T H, CHEN C, et al. Optimal regularization in distribution of relaxation times applied to electrochemical impedance spectroscopy: Ridge and lasso regression methods-A theoretical and experimental study[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2014, 147: 470-482. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.09.058.
48	WAN T H, SACCOCCIO M, CHEN C, et al. Influence of the discretization methods on the distribution of relaxation times deconvolution: Implementing radial basis functions with DRTtools[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2015, 184: 483-499. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.09.097.
49	LIU J P, CIUCCI F. The deep-prior distribution of relaxation times[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2020, 167(2): 026506. DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/ab631a.
50	QUATTROCCHI E, WAN T H, BELOTTI A, et al. The deep-DRT: A deep neural network approach to deconvolve the distribution of relaxation times from multidimensional electrochemical impedance spectroscopy data[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2021, 392: 139010. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.139010.
51	PASTOR-FERNÁNDEZ C, DHAMMIKA WIDANAGE W, MARCO J, et al. Identification and quantification of ageing mechanisms in lithium-ion batteries using the EIS technique[C]//2016 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo (ITEC). June 27-29, 2016, Dearborn, MI. IEEE, 2016: 1-6. DOI: 10.1109/ITEC. 2016.7520198.
52	CHRISTENSEN J, NEWMAN J. Cyclable lithium and capacity loss in Li-ion cells[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2005, 152(4): A818. DOI: 10.1149/1.1870752.
53	DUBARRY M, TRUCHOT C, LIAW B Y. Synthesize battery degradation modes via a diagnostic and prognostic model[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2012, 219: 204-216. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.07.016.
54	DAHN H M, SMITH A J, BURNS J C, et al. User-friendly differential voltage analysis freeware for the analysis of degradation mechanisms in Li-ion batteries[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2012, 159(9): A1405-A1409. DOI: 10. 1149/2.013209jes.
55	RUAN H J, CHEN J Y, AI W L, et al. Generalised diagnostic framework for rapid battery degradation quantification with deep learning[J]. Energy and AI, 2022, 9: 100158. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyai.2022.100158.
56	COSTA N, SÁNCHEZ L, ANSEÁN D, et al. Li-ion battery degradation modes diagnosis via Convolutional Neural Networks[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2022, 55: 105558. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2022.105558.
57	CHEN B R, WALKER C M, KIM S, et al. Battery aging mode identification across NMC compositions and designs using machine learning[J]. Joule, 2022, 6(12): 2776-2793. DOI: 10. 1016/j.joule.2022.10.016.
58	TELIZ E, ZINOLA C F, DÍAZ V. Identification and quantification of ageing mechanisms in Li-ion batteries by Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2022, 426: 140801. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.140801.
59	SUN H, JIANG B, YOU H Z, et al. Quantitative analysis of degradation modes of lithium-ion battery under different operating conditions[J]. Energies, 2021, 14(2): 350. DOI: 10.3390/en14020350.
60	HITESH PENJURU N M, REDDY G V, NAIR M R, et al. Machine learning aided predictions for capacity fade of Li-ion batteries[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2022, 169(5): 050535. DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/ac7102.
61	ZHANG Y W, TANG Q C, ZHANG Y, et al. Identifying degradation patterns of lithium ion batteries from impedance spectroscopy using machine learning[J]. Nature Communications, 2020, 11(1): 1706. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15235-7.
62	XU T T, PENG Z, LIU D G, et al. A hybrid drive method for capacity prediction of lithium-ion batteries[J]. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, 2022, 8(1): 1000-1012. DOI: 10.1109/TTE.2021.3118813.
63	LI Y C, MALEKI M, BANITAAN S. State of health estimation of lithium-ion batteries using EIS measurement and transfer learning[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2023, 73: 109185. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2023.109185.
64	PRADYUMNA T K, CHO K, KIM M, et al. Capacity estimation of lithium-ion batteries using convolutional neural network and impedance spectra[J]. Journal of Power Electronics, 2022, 22(5): 850-858. DOI: 10.1007/s43236-022-00410-4.
65	LI Y C, MALEKI M, BANITAAN S, et al. State of health estimation of lithium-ion batteries using convolutional neural network with impedance nyquist plots[C]//Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Pattern Recognition Applications and Methods. February 22-24, 2023. Lisbon, Portugal. SCITEPRESS-Science and Technology Publications, 2023: 842–849[2024-04-29]. DOI: 10.5220/0011672300003411.
66	EDDAHECH A, BRIAT O, BERTRAND N, et al. Behavior and state-of-health monitoring of Li-ion batteries using impedance spectroscopy and recurrent neural networks[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2012, 42(1): 487-494. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.04.050.
67	KIM S, CHOI Y Y, CHOI J I. Impedance-based capacity estimation for lithium-ion batteries using generative adversarial network[J]. Applied Energy, 2022, 308: 118317. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118317.
68	BABAEIYAZDI I, REZAEI-ZARE A, SHOKRZADEH S. Transfer learning with deep neural network for capacity prediction of Li-ion batteries using EIS measurement[J]. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, 2023, 9(1): 886-895. DOI: 10.1109/TTE.2022.3170230.
69	XIONG R, TIAN J P, SHEN W X, et al. Semi-supervised estimation of capacity degradation for lithium ion batteries with electrochemical impedance spectroscopy[J]. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2023, 76: 404-413. DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2022.09.045.
70	JIANG B, ZHU J G, WANG X Y, et al. A comparative study of different features extracted from electrochemical impedance spectroscopy in state of health estimation for lithium-ion batteries[J]. Applied Energy, 2022, 322: 119502. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy. 2022.119502.
71	FU Y M, XU J, SHI M J, et al. A fast impedance calculation-based battery state-of-health estimation method[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2022, 69(7): 7019-7028. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2021.3097668.
72	FARAJI-NIRI M, RASHID M, SANSOM J, et al. Accelerated state of health estimation of second life lithium-ion batteries via electrochemical impedance spectroscopy tests and machine learning techniques[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2023, 58: 106295. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2022.106295.
73	XIA B Z, QIN Z P, FU H Y. Rapid estimation of battery state of health using partial electrochemical impedance spectra and interpretable machine learning[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2024, 603: 234413. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.234413.
74	MESSING M, SHOA T, HABIBI S. Estimating battery state of health using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and the relaxation effect[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2021, 43: 103210. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2021.103210.
75	LIN Y H, RUAN S J, CHEN Y X, et al. Physics-informed deep learning for lithium-ion battery diagnostics using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2023, 188: 113807. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113807.
76	LUO W, SYED A U, NICHOLLS J R, et al. An SVM-based health classifier for offline Li-ion batteries by using EIS technology[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2023, 170(3): 030532. DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/acc09f.
77	ZHANG W C, LI T T, WU W X, et al. Data-driven state of health estimation in retired battery based on low and medium-frequency electrochemical impedance spectroscopy[J]. Measurement, 2023, 211: 112597. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.112597.
78	SU X J, SUN B X, WANG J J, et al. Fast capacity estimation for lithium-ion battery based on online identification of low-frequency electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and Gaussian process regression[J]. Applied Energy, 2022, 322: 119516. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119516.
79	ZHU Y L, JIANG B, ZHU J G, et al. Adaptive state of health estimation for lithium-ion batteries using impedance-based timescale information and ensemble learning[J]. Energy, 2023, 284: 129283. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.129283.
80	WANG J, ZHAO R, HUANG Q A, et al. High-efficient prediction of state of health for lithium-ion battery based on AC impedance feature tuned with Gaussian process regression[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2023, 561: 232737. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.232737.
81	GASPER P, SCHIEK A, SMITH K, et al. Predicting battery capacity from impedance at varying temperature and state of charge using machine learning[J]. Cell Reports Physical Science, 2022, 3(12): 101184. DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.101184.
82	RASTEGARPANAH A, HATHAWAY J, STOLKIN R. Rapid model-free state of health estimation for end-of-first-life electric vehicle batteries using impedance spectroscopy[J]. Energies, 2021, 14(9): 2597. DOI: 10.3390/en14092597.
83	ALOISIO D, CAMPOBELLO G, LEONARDI S G, et al. Comparison of machine learning techniques for SoC and SoH evaluation from impedance data of an aged lithium ion battery[J]. Acta Imeko, 2021, 10(2): 80. DOI: 10.21014/acta_imeko.v10i2.1043.
84	FAN M S, GENG M M, YANG K, et al. State of health estimation of lithium-ion battery based on electrochemical impedance spectroscopy[J]. Energies, 2023, 16(8): 3393. DOI: 10.3390/en16083393.
85	LI D Z, YANG D F, LI L W, et al. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy based on the state of health estimation for lithium-ion batteries[J]. Energies, 2022, 15(18): 6665. DOI: 10.3390/en15186665.
86	GUO F, HUANG G S, ZHANG W C, et al. State of Health estimation method for lithium batteries based on electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and pseudo-image feature extraction[J]. Measurement, 2023, 220: 113412. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113412.
87	GE H, AOKI T, IKEDA N, et al. Investigating lithium plating in lithium-ion batteries at low temperatures using electrochemical model with NMR assisted parameterization[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2017, 164(6): A1050-A1060. DOI: 10. 1149/2.0461706jes.
88	LIU X S, LIANG Z T, XIANG Y X, et al. Solid-state NMR and MRI spectroscopy for Li/Na batteries: Materials, interface, and in situ characterization[J]. Advanced Materials, 2021, 33(50): 2005878. DOI: 10.1002/adma.202005878.
89	LI B, CAO B B, ZHOU X X, et al. Pre-constructed SEI on graphite-based interface enables long cycle stability for dual ion sodium batteries[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2023, 34(7): 107832. DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.107832.
90	DAWKINS J I G, MARTENS I, DANIS A, et al. Mapping the total lithium inventory of Li-ion batteries[J]. Joule, 2023, 7(12): 2783-2797. DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2023.11.003.
91	KOLETI U R, DINH T Q, MARCO J. A new on-line method for lithium plating detection in lithium-ion batteries[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2020, 451: 227798. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour. 2020.227798.
92	SCHINDLER S, BAUER M, PETZL M, et al. Voltage relaxation and impedance spectroscopy as in-operando methods for the detection of lithium plating on graphitic anodes in commercial lithium-ion cells[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2016, 304: 170-180. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.11.044.
93	CHEN Y X, TORRES-CASTRO L, CHEN K H, et al. operando detection of Li plating during fast charging of Li-ion batteries using incremental capacity analysis[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2022, 539: 231601. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231601.
94	BURNS J C, STEVENS D A, DAHN J R. In-situ detection of lithium plating using high precision coulometry[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2015, 162(6): A959-A964. DOI: 10.1149/2.0621506jes.
95	TIAN Y, LIN C, LI H L, et al. Deep neural network-driven in situ detection and quantification of lithium plating on anodes in commercial lithium-ion batteries[J]. EcoMat, 2023, 5(1): e12280. DOI: 10.1002/eom2.12280.
96	LIN Y, HU W X, DING M F, et al. Unveiling the three stages of Li plating and dynamic evolution processes in pouch C/LiFePO₄ batteries[J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2024: 2400894. DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202400894.
97	PETZL M, KASPER M, DANZER M A. Lithium plating in a commercial lithium-ion battery–A low-temperature aging study[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2015, 275: 799-807. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.065.
98	CHEN X, LI L Y, LIU M M, et al. Detection of lithium plating in lithium-ion batteries by distribution of relaxation times[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2021, 496: 229867. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229867.
99	BROWN D E, MCSHANE E J, KONZ Z M, et al. Detecting onset of lithium plating during fast charging of Li-ion batteries using operando electrochemical impedance spectroscopy[J]. Cell Reports Physical Science, 2021, 2(10): 100589. DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100589.
100	FENG J R, ZHOU W H, CHEN Z, et al. Probing degradation of layered lithium oxide cathodes via multilength scaled X-ray imaging techniques[J]. Nano Energy, 2024, 119: 109028. DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.109028.
101	MILLER D J, ZAPOTOK D, ANZALONE P, et al. Exploring Li distribution in Li-ion batteries with FIB-SEM and TOF-SIMS[J]. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 2018, 24(S1): 370-371. DOI: 10.1017/s1431927618002349.
102	YUSUF M, LAMANNA J M, PAUL P P, et al. Simultaneous neutron and X-ray tomography for visualization of graphite electrode degradation in fast-charged lithium-ion batteries[J]. Cell Reports Physical Science, 2022, 3(11): 101145. DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.101145.
103	YANG Y Z, LI N, WANG B, et al. Microstructure evolution of lithium-ion battery electrodes at different states of charge: Deep learning-based segmentation[J]. Electrochemistry Communications, 2022, 136: 107224. DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2022.107224.
104	BALLAI G, SŐRÉS M A, VÁSÁRHELYI L, et al. Exploration of Li-ion batteries during a long-term heat endurance test using 3D temporal microcomputed tomography investigation[J]. Energy Technology, 2023, 11(8): 2370083. DOI: 10.1002/ente.202370083.
105	RIDDER A, PRIFLING B, HILGER A, et al. Quantitative analysis of cyclic aging of lithium-ion batteries using synchrotron tomography and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2023, 444: 142003. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2023.142003.
106	JONES P K, STIMMING U, LEE A A. Impedance-based forecasting of lithium-ion battery performance amid uneven usage[J]. Nature Communications, 2022, 13(1): 4806. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-32422-w.
107	BUCHICCHIO E, DE ANGELIS A, SANTONI F, et al. Battery SOC estimation from EIS data based on machine learning and equivalent circuit model[J]. Energy, 2023, 283: 128461. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128461.
108	GASPER P, SCHIEK A, SHIMONISHI Y, et al. Lithium-ion battery diagnostics using electrochemical impedance via machine-learning[J]. ECS Meeting Abstracts, 2023, 1(1): DOI: 10.1149/MA2023-011397mtgabs.

输入	模型	结果	预测范围	文献
特征频率	CNN	2.4 Ah 18650电池RMSE约1 mΩ 45 mAh LCO max RMSE 约0.11 Ω	0.1 Hz～10 kHz	[33]

CC曲线	CNN	2.4 Ah 18650电池RMSE ＜2 mΩ	0.1 Hz～100 kHz	[21]
	GPR	2.2 Ah 18650电池RMSE约1.2 mΩ	10 mHz～6.5 kHz	[22]
	LR	2.2 Ah 18650电池RMSE约3.4 mΩ	10 mHz～6.5 kHz
	RF	2.2 Ah 18650电池RMSE约1.6 mΩ	10 mHz～6.5 kHz
	XGBoost	2.2 Ah 18650电池RMSE约2.1 mΩ	10 mHz～6.5 kHz
	KNN	2.2 Ah 18650电池RMSE约1.4 mΩ	10 mHz～6.5 kHz
	ANN	2.2 Ah 18650电池RMSE约2.2 mΩ	10 mHz～6.5 kHz

CC曲线	LSTM	2.4 Ah 18650电池maxRMSE= 1.48 mΩ	100 mHz～10 kHz	[24]

CV曲线	GPR	2.6 Ah 18650电池max RMSE=0.87 mΩ	10 mHz～10 kHz	[23]
	LR	2.6 Ah 18650电池max RMSE=5.18 mΩ	10 mHz～10 kHz
	RF	2.6 Ah 18650电池max RMSE=1.04 mΩ	10 mHz～10 kHz
	XGBoost	2.6 Ah 18650电池max RMSE=1.01 mΩ	10 mHz～10 kHz
	KNN	2.6 Ah 18650电池max RMSE=0.96 mΩ	10 mHz～10 kHz

RV曲线	GPR	2.6 Ah 18650电池max RMSE=0.72 mΩ	10 mHz～10 kHz	[23]
	LR	2.6 Ah 18650电池max RMSE=1.95 mΩ	10 mHz～10 kHz
	RF	2.6 Ah 18650电池max RMSE=0.77 mΩ	10 mHz～10 kHz
	XGBoost	2.6 Ah 18650电池max RMSE=0.80 mΩ	10 mHz～10 kHz
	KNN	2.6 Ah 18650电池max RMSE=0.87 mΩ	10 mHz～10 kHz

99 s脉冲(1 Hz)	LSTM	2.4 Ah 18650电池 RMSE约1.0 mΩ	100 mHz～10 kHz	[29]

10 s脉冲(10 Hz)	ANN	2.5 Ah SONY US18650VTC5电池，RMSE为2.1 mΩ	1.15 Hz～11.5 kHz	[30]

EIS数据频率、周期电位、温度和SOC	集成学习	30 mAh LIR203预测相角准确率99.9%	10^-2～10⁵ Hz	[31]
EIS数据频率、周期电位、温度和SOC	集成学习	实部阻抗98.54%置信区间虚部阻抗95.35%置信区间	20 mHz～100 kHz	[32]

类型	模型	内容	文献
ECM的选取和参数识别	贝叶斯统计法	预测仅含电阻和电容的ECM，超过90%准确率	[34]
	支持向量机	预测五种典型的ECM，预测准确度为78%	[35]
	CNN-LSTM	对最佳电路模型预测，在实验测量的阻抗数据验证其有效性，可用于快速筛选建模大型阻抗谱数据	[36]
	DNN	允许使用生成数据和真实EIS数据训练ECM模型，拟合失败率小于1%	[37]
	ANN	引入新的损失函数进行优化识别电池老化EIS产生的变化	[38]

不同机器学习模型识别ECM准确性比较	XGboost/RF/CNN	XGboost最佳，CNN可以用于ECM分类，但仍面临挑战	[39]

EIS的数据(数量/输入形式/输出标签)对机器学习识别ECM的影响	ANN	200条数据足以用于简单的ECM识别，准确率95%，对于复杂场景识别准确率仅为75%	[40]
	Resnet	讨论EIS的输入情况(Nyquist图/波特图以及三种归一化数据对于预测ECM的影响	[41]
	PCA/t-SNE/UMAP	在无监督条件下在面临复杂条件的EIS可能无法完全揭示EIS谱图的细微差别	[42]

输入	模型	预测结果	文献
宽频输入	DNN-TL	在25 ℃和35 ℃训练的DNN模型MSE为0.0266，R²为99.68%	[63]
	CNN	1C放电下RMSE为9.57%	[69]
	CNN	RMSE为1.974 SOH%和最大误差为4.935 SOH%	[82]
	GPR	RMSE为1.1096%， R²为0.9759，MSE为1.0374	[71]
	GPR	R²为0.88	[61]
	GPR	RMSE为1.168%，MAE为1.016%	[70]
	FL，SVM ANN，RF	R²为0.98，MAE为1.87	[83]

宽频+IC	SVR-Elman-ELM	R²为0.9957,MAE为0.0065，RMSE为0.109	[62]

特征频率	SVR	预测结果相对误差都在2%以内	[84]
	DR, lightGBM XGboost,Catboost	RMSE为3.16，MSE为9.96，R²为0.81	[73]
	ELM	估计误差小于2%	[72]
	GPR	RMSE为0.932%，MAE为0.750%	[70]

等效电路	IPSO-CNN-BILSTM	RMSE为1.76%	[85]
	RNN	容量估计MSE为0.462	[66]
	SVM	准确性可以达到80%	[76]
	GRU	RMSE, MAE, MAPE均小于 2 %.	[77]

宽频输入+ 等效电路	PIDL	RMSE为6.36%，R²为0.95	[75]

DRT	ARD-GPR	RMSE为0.6%,MAE为0.4%，R²为0.992	[80]
DRT	LSBoost	RMSE在不同电池工作状态下可以保持在2.08%以内	[79]

Nyquist图转换为图像后输入	VGG	RMSE小于2%，与基准模型相比，准确度提高了55.6%	[86]

内容	开源地址	文献
基于EIS和电池寿命数据	https://github.com/PenelopeJones/battery-forecasting	[106]
基于EIS和剩余使用寿命RUF数据	https://github.com/YunweiZhang/MLidentify-battery-degradation	[61]
基于等效电路EIS数据	https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/mbv3bx847g	[107]
基于不同SOC 不同温度EIS数据	https://github.com/battery-data-commons/mrs-sp22-tutorial/tree/main/predict_capacity_from_eis.	[81]
基于EIS的健康状态数据	EIS Dataset & NN code (figshare.com)	[82]
基于EIS的锂离子电池电化学诊断数据	www.github.com/NREL/battery_capacity_from_eis	[108]
基于EIS的电池容量预测数据	https://ti.arc.nasa.gov/tech/dash/groups/pcoe/prognostic-data-repository/	[85]

[1]	孙中麟, 李嘉波, 田迪, 王志璇, 邢晓静. 基于COA-LSTM和VMD的锂离子电池剩余寿命预测[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(9): 3254-3265.
[2]	陆继忠, 彭思敏, 李晓宇. 基于多特征量分析和LSTM-XGBoost模型的锂离子电池SOH估计方法[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(9): 2972-2982.
[3]	胡雪峰, 常先雷, 刘肖肖, 徐威, 张文彬. 适用于宽温度范围的锂离子电池SOC估计方法[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(9): 2983-2994.
[4]	沈思远, 刘亚坤, 罗栋煌, 李雨珺, 郝伟. 储能锂离子电池模组暂态过电压防护设计与电路研发[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(9): 3277-3286.
[5]	陈媛, 章思源, 蔡宇晶, 黄小贺, 刘炎忠. 融合多项式特征扩展与CNN-Transformer模型的锂电池SOH估计[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(9): 2995-3005.
[6]	樊金保, 李娜, 吴宜琨, 贺春旺, 杨乐, 宋维力, 陈浩森. 能源电池单体层级数字孪生技术[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(9): 3112-3133.
[7]	李亚捷, 王依平, 陈斌, 林海龙, 张更, 施思齐. 机器学习辅助相场模拟预测锂离子输运参数对电池枝晶最大生长高度和空间利用率的影响[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(9): 2864-2870.
[8]	邢瑞鹤, 翁素婷, 李叶晶, 张佳怡, 张浩, 王雪锋. AI辅助电池材料表征与数据分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(9): 2839-2863.
[9]	何宁, 杨芳芳. 考虑能量和温度特征的锂离子电池早期寿命预测[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(9): 3016-3029.
[10]	管鸿盛, 钱诚, 孙博, 任羿. 贫数据条件下锂离子电池容量退化轨迹预测方法[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(9): 3084-3093.
[11]	刘定宏, 董文楷, 李召阳, 张红烛, 齐昕. 基于RUN-GRU-attention模型的实车动力电池健康状态估计方法[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(9): 3042-3058.
[12]	柯学, 洪华伟, 郑鹏, 李智诚, 范培潇, 杨军, 郭宇铮, 蒯春光. 基于多时间尺度建模自动特征提取和通道注意力机制的锂离子电池健康状态估计[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(9): 3059-3071.
[13]	田成文, 孙丙香, 赵鑫泽, 付智城, 马仕昌, 赵博, 张旭博. 基于数据驱动的锂离子电池快速寿命预测[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(9): 3103-3111.
[14]	周国兵, 许审镇. 锂金属负极固态电解质界面膜形成和生长机理的理论研究进展[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(9): 3150-3160.
[15]	李从心, 岳美玲, 李昕彤, 熊庆辉, 刘孝艳. 基于条件神经网络的质子交换膜燃料电池的老化性能预测[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(9): 3094-3102.

机器学习强化的电化学阻抗谱技术及其在锂离子电池研究中的应用

Machine learning-enhanced electrochemical impedance spectroscopy for lithium-ion battery research

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 15

参考文献 108

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价