Energy Storage Science and Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (8): 2594-2605.doi: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2023.0265
• Energy Storage Test: Methods and Evaluation • Previous Articles Next Articles
Man CHEN1(), Zhixiang CHENG2, Chunpeng ZHAO2, Peng PENG1, Qikai LEI1, Kaiqiang JIN2, Qingsong WANG2()
Received:
2023-04-25
Revised:
2023-05-09
Online:
2023-08-05
Published:
2023-08-23
Contact:
Qingsong WANG
E-mail:13926159826@139.com;pinew@ustc.edu.cn
CLC Number:
Man CHEN, Zhixiang CHENG, Chunpeng ZHAO, Peng PENG, Qikai LEI, Kaiqiang JIN, Qingsong WANG. Numerical simulation study on explosion hazards of lithium-ion battery energy storage containers[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(8): 2594-2605.
Table 1
Incomplete statistics of accidents at energy storage power stations from September 2011 to April 2021"
序号 | 地点 | 容量/MWh | 用途 | 储能技术 | 建筑形态 | 时间 | 投运时间 | 事故类型 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 日本 | — | 需求管理 | 钠硫电池 | 组装式 | 2011.09 | — | 充电中 |
2 | 美国 | 20 | 风电 | 铅酸电池 | 集装箱 | 2012.08 | 6个月 | 充电中 |
3 | 美国亚利桑那 | 2 | 需求管理 | 三元 | 集装箱 | 2019.04 | 24个月 | 使用中 |
4 | 比利时 | — | — | 锂电池 | 集装箱 | 2017.11 | — | — |
5 | 中国山西 | — | 调频 | 三元 | 集装箱 | 2017.05 | — | 充电后等待中 |
6 | 中国江苏 | — | 用户侧 | 磷酸铁锂 | 集装箱 | 2018.08 | 建设中 | 过充电 |
7 | 中国北京 | 2 | 用户侧 | 锂电池 | 集装箱 | 2019.05 | 20个月 | 运行维护中 |
8 | 中国北京 | 20 | 光储充 | 磷酸铁锂 | 厂房式/混凝土 | 2021.04 | — | 安装调试 |
9 | 韩国全北高敞 | 1.46 | 风电 | 海岸/三元 | 集装箱 | 2017.08 | — | 安装中(保管) |
10 | 韩国庆北景山 | 8.6 | 调频 | 山地/三元 | 组件式面板 | 2018.06 | 22个月 | 修理调查中 |
11 | 韩国全南英岩 | 14 | 风电 | 山地/三元 | 组件式面板 | 2018.06 | 29个月 | 修理调查中 |
12 | 韩国全南群山 | 18.96 | 太阳能 | 海岸/三元 | 组件式面板 | 2018.06 | 6个月 | 充电后等待中 |
13 | 韩国全南海南 | 2.99 | 太阳能 | 海岸/三元 | 组件式面板 | 2018.07 | 7个月 | 充电后等待中 |
14 | 韩国全南居昌 | 9.7 | 风电 | 山地/三元 | 组件式面板 | 2018.07 | 19个月 | 充电后等待中 |
15 | 韩国世宗 | 18 | 需求响应 | 工厂/三元 | 组件式面板 | 2018.07 | — | 安装中(施工) |
16 | 韩国忠北荣洞 | 5.989 | 太阳能 | 山地/三元 | 组件式面板 | 2018.09 | 8个月 | 充电后等待中 |
17 | 韩国忠南泰安 | 6 | 太阳能 | 海岸/三元 | 组件式面板 | 2018.09 | — | 安装中(施工) |
18 | 韩国济州 | 0.18 | 太阳能 | 商圈/三元 | 混凝土 | 2018.09 | 48个月 | 充电中 |
19 | 韩国京畿道 | 17.7 | 调频 | 工厂/三元 | 集装箱 | 2018.10 | 31个月 | 修理检查中 |
20 | 韩国庆北英州 | 3.66 | 太阳能 | 山地/三元 | 组件式面板 | 2018.11 | 9个月 | 充电后等待中 |
21 | 韩国忠南天安 | 1.22 | 太阳能 | 山地/三元 | 加式面板 | 2018.11 | 11个月 | 充电后等待中 |
22 | 韩国忠北门庆 | 4.16 | 太阳能 | 山地/三元 | 组件式面板 | 2018.11 | 11个月 | 充电后等待中 |
23 | 韩国庆南巨匠 | 1.331 | 太阳能 | 山地/三元 | 组件式面板 | 2018.11 | 7个月 | 充电后等待中 |
24 | 韩国忠北堤川 | 9.316 | 需求响应 | 山地/三元 | 组件式面板 | 2018.12 | 12个月 | 充电后等待中 |
25 | 韩国江源 | 2.662 | 太阳能 | 山地/三元 | 组件式面板 | 2018.12 | 12个月 | 充电后等待中 |
26 | 韩国庆南梁山 | 3.289 | 需求响应 | 工厂/三元 | 组件式面板 | 2019.01 | 10个月 | 充电后等待中 |
27 | 韩国全南莞岛 | 5.22 | 太阳能 | 山地/三元 | 组件式面板 | 2019.01 | 14个月 | 充电中 |
28 | 韩国全北长寿 | 2.496 | 太阳能 | 山地/三元 | 集装箱 | 2019.01 | 9个月 | 充电后等待中 |
29 | 韩国蔚山 | 46.757 | 需求响应 | 工厂/三元 | 混凝土 | 2019.01 | 7个月 | 充电后等待中 |
30 | 韩国庆北七谷 | 3.66 | 太阳能 | 山地/三元 | 组件式面板 | 2019.05 | 27个月 | 充电后等待中 |
31 | 韩国全北长寿 | 1.022 | 太阳能 | 山地/三元 | 组件式面板 | 2019.05 | 12个月 | 充电后等待中 |
32 | 韩国忠南 | — | 太阳能 | 三元 | 集装箱 | 2021.04 | — | — |
Table 4
Location of ignition points"
序号 | 坐标(x, y, z)/m | 序号 | 坐标(x, y, z)/m |
---|---|---|---|
Case 1 | 0.59, 1.99, 0.22 | Case 7 | 5.45, 1.99, 0.22 |
Case 2 | 0.59, 1.99, 1.06 | Case 8 | 5.45, 1.99, 1.06 |
Case 3 | 0.59, 1.99, 2.16 | Case 9 | 5.45, 1.99, 2.16 |
Case 4 | 2.75, 1.99, 0.22 | Case 10 | 1.51, 1.21, 1.10 |
Case 5 | 2.75, 1.99, 1.06 | Case 11 | 3.02, 1.21, 1.10 |
Case 6 | 2.75, 1.99, 2.16 | Case 12 | 4.53, 1.21, 1.10 |
Table 5
Variation of explosion characteristic parameters with fire point"
序号 | 压力/kPa | 速度/(m/s) | 泄压板平均压力/kPa | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Panel 1 | Panel 2 | Panel 3 | |||
Case 1 | 5.77 | 285.0 | 4.13 | 4.13 | 5.42 |
Case 2 | 7.62 | 318.8 | 4.37 | 4.37 | 5.52 |
Case 3 | 7.75 | 253.6 | 4.28 | 4.28 | 5.41 |
Case 4 | 7.30 | 254.3 | 4.21 | 4.21 | 5.03 |
Case 5 | 12.81 | 302.8 | 4.37 | 4.37 | 5.26 |
Case 6 | 8.99 | 290.3 | 4.23 | 4.23 | 5.01 |
Case 7 | 15.24 | 318.1 | 4.69 | 4.69 | 5.07 |
Case 8 | 41.28 | 557.0 | 4.62 | 4.76 | 5.21 |
Case 9 | 15.84 | 320.7 | 4.68 | 4.68 | 5.07 |
Case 10 | 7.98 | 182.5 | 4.90 | 4.90 | 6.21 |
Case 11 | 16.88 | 344.0 | 4.93 | 4.93 | 5.92 |
Case 12 | 32.79 | 413.7 | 5.12 | 5.12 | 5.82 |
Fig. 6
(a) and (b): When the ignition point is set in the middle of the channel, the 2D combustion product and maximum pressure distribution at the cross section of Y=1.22 m in Case 11; (c) Change of pressure at the center of Case 11 pressure relief plate with time; (d) Time dependent variation of shock wave pressure outside the pressure relief port of Case 11"
Table 7
Changes of explosion characteristic parameters with relief plate settings"
序号 | 压力/kPa | 速度/(m/s) | 泄压板平均压力/kPa | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Panel 1 | Panel 2 | Panel 3 | |||
Case 1 | 666.80 | 47.28 | — | — | — |
Case 2 | 25.16 | 756.9 | 5.02 | 5.02 | — |
Case 3 | 35.96 | 884.3 | 12.06 | 12.06 | — |
Case 4 | 71.22 | 1137 | 23.21 | 23.21 | — |
Case 5 | 143.10 | 1229 | 33.73 | 33.73 | — |
Case 6 | 16.88 | 344.0 | 4.93 | 4.93 | 5.92 |
Case 7 | 22.59 | 401.5 | 12.06 | 12.06 | 13.69 |
Case 8 | 45.68 | 617.5 | 23.21 | 23.21 | 24.93 |
Case 9 | 102.9 | 971.6 | 33.73 | 33.73 | 35.28 |
Case 10 | 13.68 | 344.2 | 8.21 | 8.21 | 7.54 |
1 | HENRIKSEN M, VAAGSAETHER K, LUNDBERG J, et al. Explosion characteristics for Li-ion battery electrolytes at elevated temperatures[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2019, 371: 1-7. |
2 | CHEN S C, WANG Z R, WANG J H, et al. Lower explosion limit of the vented gases from Li-ion batteries thermal runaway in high temperature condition[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2020, 63: doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2019.103992. |
3 | ZHONG X H, LIU W, HAN J W, et al. Pyrolysis and physical separation for the recovery of spent LiFePO4 batteries[J]. Waste Management, 2019, 89: 83-93. |
4 | 曹文炅, 雷博, 史尤杰, 等. 韩国锂离子电池储能电站安全事故的分析及思考[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2020, 9(5): 1539-1547. |
CAO W J, LEI B, SHI Y J, et al. Ponderation over the recent safety accidents of lithium-ion battery energy storage stations in South Korea[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2020, 9(5): 1539-1547. | |
5 | 牛志远, 金阳, 孙磊, 等. 预制舱式磷酸铁锂电池储能电站燃爆事故模拟及安全防护仿真研究[J]. 高电压技术, 2022, 48(5): 1924-1933. |
NIU Z Y, JIN Y, SUN L, et al. Safety protection simulation research and fire explosion accident simulation of prefabricated compartment lithium iron phosphate energy storage power station[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2022, 48(5): 1924-1933. | |
6 | 程志翔, 曹伟, 户波, 等. 储能用大容量磷酸铁锂电池热失控行为及燃爆传播特性[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(3): 923-933. |
CHENG Z X, CAO W, HU B, et al. Thermal runaway and explosion propagation characteristics of large lithium iron phosphate battery for energy storage station[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(3): 923-933. | |
7 | 崔潇丹, 丛晓民, 赵林双. 锂离子电池热失控气体及燃爆危险性研究进展[J]. 电池, 2021, 51(4): 407-411. |
CUI X D, CONG X M, ZHAO L S. Research progress in thermal runaway gases and explosion hazards of Li-ion battery[J]. Battery Bimonthly, 2021, 51(4): 407-411. | |
8 | 郭超超, 张青松. 锂离子电池热解气体爆炸极限测定及其危险性分析[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2016, 12(9): 46-49. |
GUO C C, ZHANG Q S. Determination on explosion limit of pyrolysis gas released by lithium-ion battery and its risk analysis[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2016, 12(9): 46-49. | |
9 | 郑昆, 侯卫国, 马军, 等. 基于环境试验设备的锂离子电池燃爆特性分析[J]. 环境技术, 2021, 39(3): 186-188, 197. |
ZHENG K, HOU W G, MA J, et al. Analysis of burning explosion characteristics of lithium ion batteries based on environmental test equipment[J]. Environmental Technology, 2021, 39(3): 186-188, 197. | |
10 | 张国维, 贾伯岩. 液氮对高温锂离子电池防火抑爆效果试验研究[C]//2020中国消防协会科学技术年会论文集. 2020: 945-951. |
11 | SKJOLD T, HISKEN H, LAKSHMIPATHY S, et al. Blind-prediction: Estimating the consequences of vented hydrogen deflagrations for homogeneous mixtures in 20-foot ISO containers[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(17): 8997-9008. |
12 | KOCH S, FILL A, BIRKE K P. Comprehensive gas analysis on large scale automotive lithium-ion cells in thermal runaway[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2018, 398: 106-112. |
13 | WANG K, SHI T T, HE Y R, et al. Case analysis and CFD numerical study on gas explosion and damage processing caused by aging urban subsurface pipeline failures[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2019, 97: 201-219. |
14 | LI J D, HERNANDEZ F, HAO H, et al. Vented methane-air explosion overpressure calculation-a simplified approach based on CFD[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2017, 109: 489-508. |
15 | HJERTAGER B H. Computer simulation of turbulent reactive gas dynamics[J]. Modeling, Identification and Control: A Norwegian Research Bulletin, 1984, 5(4): 211-236. |
[1] | Libo ZHANG, Gege WANG. Topic identification, evolution, and risk analysis of electrochemical energy storage battery technology [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(8): 2680-2692. |
[2] | Min ZHAO, Yang LI, Jie CAI, Weibin KANG, Lei LIU. Experimental study on the performance of capillary phase-change energy storage tank for civil building [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(8): 2626-2637. |
[3] | Xiaolong XIAO, Mingming SHI, Qi ZHOU, Yukai WEI, Bo ZHAO. Multiobjective optimization configuration of energy storage in distribution networks based on improved marine predator algorithm [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(8): 2565-2574. |
[4] | Jinghao YAN, Jie LI, Yiming LI, Xiaoqin SUN, Lina XI, Changwei JIANG. Numerical simulation study on heat storage performance of composite phase-change units based on gradient-porosity metal foam [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(8): 2424-2434. |
[5] | Ke DING, Guangchao GENG, Quanyuan JIANG. Collaborative optimization method for improving the frequency response characteristics of energy storage and DC systems considering multiscenario demands [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(8): 2649-2658. |
[6] | Ming LI, Jinyuan XIE, Muchu QIU, Liang SHAO, Qiang HUO. Research on balanced thermal management and energy saving of energy storage system based on planning curve [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(8): 2585-2593. |
[7] | Jin LI, Qingsong WANG, Depeng KONG, Xiaodong WANG, Zhenhua YU, Yanfei LE, Xinyan HUANG, Zhenkai HU, Houfu WU, Huabin FANG, Caowei, Shaoyu ZHANG, Ping ZHUO, Ye CHEN, Ziting LI, Wenxin MEI, Yue ZHANG, Lixiang ZHAO, Liang TANG, Zonghou HUANG, Chi CHEN, Yanhu LIU, Yuxi CHU, Xiaoyuan XU, Jin ZHANG, Yikai LI, Rong FENG, Biao YANG, Bo HU, Xiaoying YANG. Research progress on the safety assessment of lithium-ion battery energy storage [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(7): 2282-2301. |
[8] | Yi WANG, Xuebing CHEN, Yuanxi WANG, Jieyun ZHENG, Xiaosong LIU, Hong LI. Overview of multilevel failure mechanism and analysis technology of energy storage lithium-ion batteries [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(7): 2079-2094. |
[9] | Zenghui HAO, Xunliang LIU, Yuan MENG, Nan MENG, Zhi WEN. Effect of electrode interface microstructure on the performance of solid-state lithium-ion battery [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(7): 2095-2104. |
[10] | Yikun WU, Jie HE, Le YANG, Weili SONG, Haosen CHEN. Multiscale and multiphysics theoretical model and computational method for lithium-ion batteries [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(7): 2141-2154. |
[11] | Yuxin CHEN, Jiamu YANG, Cheng LIAN, Honglai LIU. Analysis of stable coating window of lithium battery electrode paste based on phase field models [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(7): 2185-2193. |
[12] | Liya MA, Baohui GUO. Failure analysis and structure optimization of energy storage module [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(7): 2194-2201. |
[13] | Guangjin ZHAO, Bowen LI, Yuxia HU, Ruifeng DONG, Fangfang WANG. Overview of the echelon utilization technology and engineering application of retired power batteries [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(7): 2319-2332. |
[14] | Hongjian WANG, Yongchun LAI, Xianjin SU, Chunbao ZENG, Linyi XU. Solutions for new energy construction projects in extreme operating environments and liquid cooled energy storage [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(7): 2349-2354. |
[15] | Yuxin CHEN, Jiamu YANG, Dongbo LI, Cheng LIAN, Honglai LIU. Numerical simulation of the vacuum drying process of cylindrical lithium-ion batteries [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(6): 1957-1967. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||